Re: [squid-users] Evaluating SQUID performance

2013-07-25 Thread John Joseph
HI All My Sincere thanks to Amos,Eliezer,Firas,Henrik Based on your advice, I  have decided to try out squidclient      calamaris      msar      web-polygraph Right now trying with squidclient, trying out its options and trying to understand. I have another idea which sprang up, I plan

RE: [squid-users] Too many open files

2013-07-25 Thread Peter Retief
On 07/25/2013 09:25 AM, Peter Retief wrote: I have changed the limits in /etc/security/limits.h to 65K, and I have confirmed that the ulimits for root and squid are now 65K, but squidclient mgr:info still reports a maximum of 16K per worker. Eliezer: Ubutnu ??? try to add into the init.d

RE: [squid-users] Too many open files

2013-07-25 Thread Peter Retief
To handle the load I have 6 workers, each allocated its own physical disk (noatime). I have set ulimit -Sn 16384 and ulimit -Hn 16384, by setting /etc/security/limits.conf as follows: # - Increase file descriptor limits for Squid * softnofile 16384 *

Re: [squid-users] Evaluating SQUID performance

2013-07-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/07/2013 6:30 p.m., John Joseph wrote: HI All My Sincere thanks to Amos,Eliezer,Firas,Henrik Based on your advice, I have decided to try out squidclient calamaris msar web-polygraph Right now trying with squidclient, trying out its options and trying to

[squid-users] caching failed tcp connects to destination ips

2013-07-25 Thread Dieter Bloms
Hi, we use ipv4 and ipv6 tcp protocol for our outgoing interface. The most sides are accessable via ipv6, if a Record is available, so ipv6 works great in most cases. Some sides like http://www.hsp-steuer.de/ announce ipv6 records, but are not accessable via ipv6. Is it possible that squid

Re: [squid-users] caching failed tcp connects to destination ips

2013-07-25 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 07/25/2013 09:52 AM, Dieter Bloms wrote: Hi, we use ipv4 and ipv6 tcp protocol for our outgoing interface. The most sides are accessable via ipv6, if a Record is available, so ipv6 works great in most cases. Some sides like http://www.hsp-steuer.de/ announce ipv6 records, but are

Re: [squid-users] caching failed tcp connects to destination ips

2013-07-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/07/2013 6:52 p.m., Dieter Bloms wrote: Hi, we use ipv4 and ipv6 tcp protocol for our outgoing interface. The most sides are accessable via ipv6, if a Record is available, so ipv6 works great in most cases. Some sides like http://www.hsp-steuer.de/ announce ipv6 records, but are not

Re: [squid-users] caching failed tcp connects to destination ips

2013-07-25 Thread Dieter Bloms
Hi Amos, thank you for your quick answer. On Thu, Jul 25, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 25/07/2013 6:52 p.m., Dieter Bloms wrote: Hi, we use ipv4 and ipv6 tcp protocol for our outgoing interface. The most sides are accessable via ipv6, if a Record is available, so ipv6 works great in most

Re: [squid-users] caching failed tcp connects to destination ips

2013-07-25 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 07/25/2013 10:37 AM, Dieter Bloms wrote: I did, but the provider is resistant about this. ask about it in bind users list. Others will confirm your doubt.. If it's real most likely you it can be reproduced and you will have no problem with the site. Eliezer

Re: [squid-users] Too many open files

2013-07-25 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 07/25/2013 09:43 AM, Peter Retief wrote: Do you mean you've patched the source code, and if so, how do I get that patch? Do I have to move from the stable trunk? what version are you using? run `squid -v` to get the version etc.. I assume that else then the RPM I am releasing there aren't

RE: [squid-users] Too many open files

2013-07-25 Thread Peter Retief
Peter: The first log occurences are: 2013/07/23 08:26:13 kid2| Attempt to open socket for EUI retrieval failed: (24) Too many open files 2013/07/23 08:26:13 kid2| comm_open: socket failure: (24) Too many open files 2013/07/23 08:26:13 kid2| Reserved FD adjusted from 100 to 15394 due to

[squid-users] About refresh_pattern

2013-07-25 Thread Ricardo Rios
Hi list, i am trying to cache some application exe files and updates using refresh_pattern, when i check my regex at some online tool tester, regex works great, but when i use it, i dont see anything else then TCP_MISS/206 on my logs Regex: refresh_pattern

Re: [squid-users] About refresh_pattern

2013-07-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 26/07/2013 12:04 p.m., Ricardo Rios wrote: Hi list, i am trying to cache some application exe files and updates using refresh_pattern, when i check my regex at some online tool tester, regex works great, but when i use it, i dont see anything else then TCP_MISS/206 on my logs 206

Re: [squid-users] About refresh_pattern

2013-07-25 Thread Ricardo Rios
On 26/07/2013 12:04 p.m., Ricardo Rios wrote: Hi list, i am trying to cache some application exe files and updates using refresh_pattern, when i check my regex at some online tool tester, regex works great, but when i use it, i dont see anything else then TCP_MISS/206 on my logs 206 Partial

Re: [squid-users] Too many open files

2013-07-25 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 07/25/2013 02:10 PM, Peter Retief wrote: Amos, any ideas where I should look to see where Ubuntu is restricting the file descriptors? I though ulimit -Sn and ulimit -Hn would tell me how many descriptors any child process should get? many things should happen and still they do not.(this is