Re: [squid-users] Squid doesn't work in WCCP, works fine as transparent

2009-12-09 Thread Daniel Rose
I think that the router's okay and your squid needs adjustment. My system only has one GRE device, not two. iptables -t nat -nvL has 3499K 197M DNAT tcp -- wccp0 * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 to:203.15.226.132:3128 95 4592 REDIRECT tcp --

[squid-users] ongoing gmail attachment problem

2009-11-05 Thread Daniel Rose
properly solved this, or heard from google themselves on the matter? Thank you! -- Daniel Rose National Library of Australia

[squid-users] What does --enable-ntlm-fail-open do?

2009-10-05 Thread Daniel Rose
But there was no answer. ./configure says A helper that fails one of the Authentication steps can allow squid to still authenticate the user. Does this mean that I'll try ntlm auth, but even if it fails I'll let you through anyway? I too desire this behaviour! -- Daniel Rose National Library

Re: [squid-users] dstdomain issue

2008-06-25 Thread Daniel Rose
is acceptable for a FQDN. Your link to facebook worked fine for me, and I would assume that you get these attempts because people are using to ending a type phrase with a full stop ENTER sequence. Howard -- Daniel Rose National Library of Australia

Re: [squid-users] Re: LiveCD type install for transparent caching of YouTube, etc?

2008-03-16 Thread Daniel Rose
package during the installation, so it should work right out of the box. -- Daniel Rose National Library of Australia

Re: [squid-users] Re: Real hit count of a user? Can it be really found?

2008-03-06 Thread Daniel Rose
to launch a browser to hit your page as a diagnostic poll to see if their connection is still up. Having said all that, awstats will probably do what you want it to. Cheers! -- Daniel Rose National Library of Australia

Re: [squid-users] problem with wccp v2 and cisco

2008-02-26 Thread Daniel Rose
$CISCO_IP local $HOST_IP dev eth0 /sbin/ifconfig wccp0 $HOST_IP netmask 255.255.255.255 up It works perfectly. However, they say that you should know it will work because it is right, not assume it is right because it works! Anyway, I hope it's right. -- Daniel Rose National Library of Australia

Re: [squid-users] Cisco/Linux/WCCP - Different Interface

2008-02-10 Thread Daniel Rose
be on the same interface of the firewall. If you try to make a dmz with the proxy, and use wccp on the firewall between the dmz and the clients, it won't work. If any of this is wrong I'd love to know as well, as these are my working understandings of the system. -- Daniel Rose National

Re: RES: [squid-users] wccp transparent proxy; returned spoofed packets are dropped!

2007-12-27 Thread Daniel Rose
Bruno Lopes de Souza Benchimol wrote: You probably can try to disable the unicast RPF feature on the ASA, i know how to it works on Routers but its probably pretty similar to the ASA Series (i also do not have one for testing... i wish i could), altough thats not the Best method because it

Re: [squid-users] wccp transparent proxy; returned spoofed packets are dropped!

2007-12-23 Thread Daniel Rose
. I will push google a bit harder before I give up though. -- Daniel Rose National Library of Australia

[squid-users] wccp transparent proxy; returned spoofed packets are dropped!

2007-12-20 Thread Daniel Rose
seems to support only wccp2, not version 1. I can put the proxy on the inside network, but I would prefer it on the DMZ if at all possible. Thanks for any advice! -- Daniel Rose National Library of Australia

Re: [squid-users] wccp transparent proxy; returned spoofed packets are dropped!

2007-12-20 Thread Daniel Rose
Adrian Chadd wrote: Didn't someone point out a few weeks ago that Cisco only support wccp redirection on the same interface as clients? I hope so! If so, could someone pipe up again please? I can't find any support for this idea from cisco. the ASA is probably (quite rightly, its a

Re: [squid-users] wccp transparent proxy; returned spoofed packets are dropped!

2007-12-20 Thread Daniel Rose
Tony Dodd wrote: Daniel Rose wrote: SQUID (linux kernel 2.6.18.xxx) Sends a spoofed ACK 'from' WWWHOST to CLIENT. The spoofed ACK never arrives at the CLIENT. CLIENT just sends 3 SYNs and times out. I assume it's dropped by the firewall, but I can't get 'debug ip packet' or similar