Make sure you have a different PID file, among other things, defined.
I'd guess that's your problem though.
--Dave
On Jun 12, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Michael St. Laurent wrote:
Is there a way to run a second instance of Squid? I've specified a
different config file for the other instance but it
On Apr 6, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
lör 2008-04-05 klockan 23:26 -0400 skrev David Lawson:
I've got a couple questions about how Squid chooses to fulfill a
request. Basically, I've got a cache with a number of sibling peers
defined. Some of the time it makes an ICP query
I've got a couple questions about how Squid chooses to fulfill a
request. Basically, I've got a cache with a number of sibling peers
defined. Some of the time it makes an ICP query to those peers and
then does everything it should do, takes the first hit, makes the HTTP
request for the
On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:57 PM, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote:
Hi,
I have squid configured as a transparent proxy in front of
application server
(ApS). Data generated by ApS gets updated infrequently and sometimes
ApS gets
slow doing it's internal housecleaning. What I want to do is for
Squid
Depending on your file system options, linux generally reserves 5% of
space for the super user. What you need to do is find out how much
space is being used by everything other than Squid, and how much
space, minus that reserved five percent, you have available, and
calibrate your disk
I use a similar setup, what you want to do is have multiple
squid.conf files for each instance, with each instance listening on a
different http_port and icp_port, then point your real servers at the
appropriate instances. It's worked out very well for me.
--Dave
On Sep 18, 2007, at 2:42
On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:00 AM, Ding Deng wrote:
Brad Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We use LVS (load balancer) to send traffic to multiple Squid 2.5
servers in reverse proxy mode. We want to put multiple Squid
instances
on one box and have successful done that by changing: http_port 80
On Jul 29, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Michael Pye wrote:
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
latest version. But I'm not sure I should do this via s-maxage
in the
response as this setting might also apply to other proxies
upstream of
me.
If you want other caches to take note of the cache-control max age