+Router utilization
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:15:55 +0200, "Raphael Maseko"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been running WCCP on a 3660 Cisco Router to redirect http traffic
to
> my cache servers and it has been working fine. I have noticed that with
an
> increase in traffic, my CPU
Hi,
I have been running WCCP on a 3660 Cisco Router to redirect http traffic to
my cache servers and it has been working fine. I have noticed that with an
increase in traffic, my CPU utilization on the router seems to be going
through the roof! (close to 100%) for most parts of the day.
After tro
Hi Robert,
If your Juniper router has WCCP support then you can consider using it for
transparent proxying. The FAQ has a section on WCCP.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kluttz [mailto:rtklu...@ngkceramics.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 9:51 PM
To: SquidCache
Subject: [squid-us
Hi Peter,
>From what I understand, if you use WCCP, you do not exactly re-write the
packet destination address but you use your router to give your packet a
'coat' or encapsulation without modifying the packet inside the
encapsulation.
The machine to which the encapsulated packet is directed rem
What is your Access list like on your router? Is it possible that the IP
Addresses of your dial-up users are not being treated the same way as the
ADSL ones?
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Kris Amy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:03 PM
To: squid-users@squid-ca
Try accessing your statistics through your webmin and see what kind or
traffic and hit ratios you are getting on your cache.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Tharanga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 12:21 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] h
Hi Kumara,
Welcome to the Squid list.
On the questions you asked...I think they are too general. I would advise
you to attempt to install your Squid using the FAQ. If you get into trouble
then you can post to the list the specific problems you are encountering.
1. For firewall setup, refer to yo
Hi,
The easiest way is to define an access list with a deny for the host and
permit the rest and apply it to the interface.
ip wccp version 1
ip wccp web-cache redirect-list 110
access-list 110 deny tcp the_host_for_exclusion any eq www
access-list 110 permit tcp any any
and apply to inter
The best way is to ensure that your squid.conf has been set up correctly
using the cache_dir ufs tag. Let the size be at least 80% of the total
partition used for the cache. Squid will purge old entries accordingly
without you having to manually delete the cache directories.
Ralph
-Original
Hi Eric,
I have never worked with OpenBSD but a lot with FreeBSD. Is your OpenBSD
using a standard GRE or you have had to "patch" it in? I experienced
something very similar to what you have described on FreeBSD 4.9 and 4.10
when I tried to implement WCCP. I must ad that this used o work fine on
pr
It looks like I am back with the FreeBSD and WCCP issue again.
I have installed FreeBSD 10.4 with IPFIREWALL and "pseudo-device gre "
enabled in the recompiled kernel. Since the documentation says that the
current version works without additional patches, I then proceeded with
installation of squi
Steve,
The good news is that logs show that your cache is fine - all the object
have been validated.
What I wanted to know, however, is where you got the information that your
cache was corrupt. Was this from the logs or from someone (I think Tim asked
you this). Is the cache working at all?
T
Hi All,
Does anyone know if there is a fix for the “WARNING: Disk space over limit:”
in 2.5.STABLE5? I found a patch for 2.3STABLE3 at
"http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.3/bugs/squid-2.3.stable3-storeExpi
redReferenceAge.patch" but no mention in the release notes of later
versions.
I am ru
What value do you have for cache_dir? This should help set how big your
cache should grow.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Steffen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] purge from cache
hello all,
after ha
through the webmin interface.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:28 PM
To: 'Raphael Maseko'
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Corrupted Cache
Ralph,
Thanks for the quick reply!
I'm getting the following errors:
Check the cache.log and see what errors are being logged. This should shade
some light on the "corruption" at hand.
When squid is started it runs an integrity check on the objects in
cache...is it echoing any error messages during startup? You may also want
to check that there is still space for ca
Ensure that the parent recognises your (200.55.137.141) as a sibling and has
acl that allows it to access the cache.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Hi, How Can I Connected t
Hi,
WCCP is a 'hack' and works by hijacking packets and redirecting them to the
cache. As far as I know, you cannot combine transparent proxy with
Authentication. You will need to manually configure the browsers for
authentication.
You will have to decide which is important for your network: Tran
Hi Carols,
Have you been able to determine that Squid is actually making use of both
processors? Do you have other applications running on the same box?
Ralph
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: [s
That works fine as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Raphael Maseko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Squid Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-user
By default the config file is set to deny access to the cache by the lines:
acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
http_access deny all
You will need to create an acl and set it to allow. e.g
acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
acl myusers src 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
http_access myusers allow
http_access deny al
ginal Message -
From: "Raphael Maseko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: [squid-users] Squidalyser 1.0b search criteria
> Hi Fellow Listers,
>
> I was trying out Squidalyser 0.2.55 and v1.0b.
>
&g
Which ACLs are you using? Also are you using route-map for redirection or
WCCP?
- Original Message -
From: "Data Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Raphael Maseko'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: [squid-
Hi Fellow Listers,
I was trying out Squidalyser 0.2.55 and v1.0b.
I managed to install and test the first version except that I did not like
the interface that it comes with. I therefore decided to try the Beta
version and succeeded in installing and configuring it after battling with
CGI and DBD
Hi Fellow Listers,
I have been running squid-2.5.STABLE4 with transparent proxying using WCCP
V1 on FreeBSD 4.6.2 without any problems.
I have now installed the same version on FreeBSD 4.9.
Unlike in the previous version where I had to apply patches and hacks to get
the gre packets stripped by
This sounds more like a routing issue than a squid configuration. You could
try using a route-map policy if you are using a cisco router. Create a
policy to match your "specific purpose" protocol and force the next-hop to
the "reserved" gateway.
Ralph
- Original Message -
From: "Alphons
26 matches
Mail list logo
