2011/6/10 Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz:
On 10/06/11 20:41, Tom Tux wrote:
Mmm...
Now I were able to force squid to die (with gdb):
From cache.log:
--- SNIP ---
(squid)(death+0x37)[0x564d37]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf5d0)[0x7f99ebe705d0]
FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
On 14/06/11 18:42, Tom Tux wrote:
2011/6/10 Amos Jeffriessqu...@treenet.co.nz:
On 10/06/11 20:41, Tom Tux wrote:
Mmm...
Now I were able to force squid to die (with gdb):
From cache.log:
--- SNIP ---
(squid)(death+0x37)[0x564d37]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf5d0)[0x7f99ebe705d0]
FATAL:
2011/6/14 Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz:
On 14/06/11 18:42, Tom Tux wrote:
2011/6/10 Amos Jeffriessqu...@treenet.co.nz:
On 10/06/11 20:41, Tom Tux wrote:
Mmm...
Now I were able to force squid to die (with gdb):
From cache.log:
--- SNIP ---
(squid)(death+0x37)[0x564d37]
From squid.conf.documented:
--- SNIP ---
# TAG: cache_mgr
# Email-address of local cache manager who will receive
# mail if the cache dies. The default is webmaster.
#Default:
# cache_mgr webmaster
--- SNAP ---
As I understand, squid will send a mail to the defined mail-recipient,
On 10/06/11 08:32, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Tom,
Du meintest am 09.06.11:
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in cache_mgr-directive). Is there a way/hack to force
squid to die?
Yes - this daemon is
On 09/06/11 23:24, Tom Tux wrote:
Hi
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in cache_mgr-directive). Is there a way/hack to force
squid to die? I tried several things like revoking permissions on the
the cache-dir, moving cache.log away... - but squid is
Hallo, Tom,
Du meintest am 10.06.11:
From squid.conf.documented:
-+- SNIP ---
# TAG: cache_mgr
# Email-address of local cache manager who will receive
# mail if the cache dies. The default is webmaster.
if the cache dies
That's another thing than a dying squid.
Viele
Mmm...
Now I were able to force squid to die (with gdb):
From cache.log:
--- SNIP ---
(squid)(death+0x37)[0x564d37]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf5d0)[0x7f99ebe705d0]
FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
2011/06/10 10:37:28.408| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
2011/06/10 10:37:28.409|
On 10/06/11 20:41, Tom Tux wrote:
Mmm...
Now I were able to force squid to die (with gdb):
From cache.log:
--- SNIP ---
(squid)(death+0x37)[0x564d37]
/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf5d0)[0x7f99ebe705d0]
FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
2011/06/10 10:37:28.408| storeDirWriteCleanLogs:
Hi
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in cache_mgr-directive). Is there a way/hack to force
squid to die? I tried several things like revoking permissions on the
the cache-dir, moving cache.log away... - but squid is still alive.
Many thanks.
Tom
On Jun 9, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Tom Tux wrote:
Hi
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in cache_mgr-directive). Is there a way/hack to force
squid to die? I tried several things like revoking permissions on the
the cache-dir, moving cache.log away...
But a kill -9 kills squid the hard way. So I don't get the desired
mail (cache_mgr-directive).
2011/6/9 jeffrey j donovan dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
On Jun 9, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Tom Tux wrote:
Hi
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in
Hallo, jeffrey,
Du meintest am 09.06.11:
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in cache_mgr-directive). Is there a way/hack to force
squid to die? I tried several things like revoking permissions on
the the cache-dir, moving cache.log away... - but
Hallo, Tom,
Du meintest am 09.06.11:
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in cache_mgr-directive). Is there a way/hack to force
squid to die?
Yes - this daemon is started from a script p.e. with the command
/etc/init.d/squid start
(the
Hi Helmut
killall (without any parameter) sends a sigterm (kill -15) to the
squid-processes. This command kill's indeed all sqBut this does not
bring squid to die and then send the mail. This command does just kill
the processes.
2011/6/9 Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de:
Hallo, Tom,
Du
Ooopsbad mail.
Again:
Hi Helmut
killall (without any parameter) sends a sigterm (kill -15) to the
squid-processes. This command kill's indeed all squid-processes, but
does not bring squid to send me the desired mail.
I think, that if squid realize that something is wrong, it shutdown
(or
Hallo, Tom,
Du meintest am 09.06.11:
Brute force (under a linux distribution):
killall squid
(if you are curious: repeat the command)
[Toppost and fullquote reordered]
killall (without any parameter) sends a sigterm (kill -15) to the
squid-processes. This command kill's indeed
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Tom,
Du meintest am 09.06.11:
I need to verify, if I get a mail when squid dies (I put a correct
mailaddress in cache_mgr-directive). Is there a way/hack to force
squid to die?
Yes - this daemon is started from a script p.e. with the command
Hallo, david,
Du meintest am 09.06.11:
Brute force (under a linux distribution):
killall squid
(if you are curious: repeat the command)
actually, you do need to repeat the command. Squid doesn't stop
immediatly when it gets the standard kill signal (15), it does some
sort of
19 matches
Mail list logo
