Mr ED,
Changing the FD value from limits.conf and including the "ulimit -HSn
4096" in squid daemon does not change the default squid FD limit.
This needs to be done in compile time.
Recompile your squid and run "ulimit -HSn 4096" after compile and before
make install. That will work.
Regards,
--
set at
> compile time. I ran into this problem myself.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Superted666 [mailto:ruckafe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mon 7/5/2010 3:33 PM
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Cc:
> Subject: [squid-users] File Descrip
:[squid-users] File Descriptors
Hello,
Got a odd problem with file descriptors im hoping you guys could help me out
with?
Background
I'm running CentOS 5.5 and squid 3.0 Stable 5.
The system is configured with 4096 file descriptors with the following :
/etc/security/limits
Hello,
Got a odd problem with file descriptors im hoping you guys could help me out
with?
Background
I'm running CentOS 5.5 and squid 3.0 Stable 5.
The system is configured with 4096 file descriptors with the following :
/etc/security/limits.conf
*- nofile 4096
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:03:53 +0100, Solaris Treize
wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm running squid-3.0.STABLE18 that I've compiled with the options
> --with-filedescriptors=32768
>
> I have added to /etc/security/limits.conf the following lines on my
> Redhat host :
> squid hardnofile
Hello,
I'm running squid-3.0.STABLE18 that I've compiled with the options
--with-filedescriptors=32768
I have added to /etc/security/limits.conf the following lines on my
Redhat host :
squid hard nofile 32768
squid soft nofile 32768
As squid user, ulimi
Abdock escreveu:
I am using centos4, i read your post, but in my case it happens just in 30
mins all descriptors get used up, and squid is running but no file left.
And this happened suddenly could be something to do with worm / network
prob, happens on heavy usage.
in my cases, it
Rodrigues Magalhães [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2008 17:59
To: Abdock
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] file descriptors and segmentation fault
Abdock escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I have been running squid for long time, same config, squid-3.0
Abdock escreveu:
Hello,
I have been running squid for long time, same config, squid-3.0-stable-7,
transparent mode. Jjust yesterday in the morning all the file descriptors
were used up, the graph showed slow decline in usage till none were left,
later on i restarted squid and it went ok for a
Hello,
I have been running squid for long time, same config, squid-3.0-stable-7,
transparent mode. Jjust yesterday in the morning all the file descriptors
were used up, the graph showed slow decline in usage till none were left,
later on i restarted squid and it went ok for a while and then again
tis 2008-06-24 klockan 23:42 +0600 skrev Azhar H. Chowdhury:
> Hi, I am running squid 3.0 stable 6 on Fedora core 6. When I run squid from
> command prompt, it's setting up "File descriptors" value to 131072 what
> I defined at compile time. But running at rc.local (Just put a line with
> path of
Hi, I am running squid 3.0 stable 6 on Fedora core 6. When I run squid from
command prompt, it's setting up "File descriptors" value to 131072 what
I defined at compile time. But running at rc.local (Just put a line with
path of squid exe location) set
the "file descriptors" value to 1024.
Squi
Hi All,
Recompilng the kernel with MAXFILES=8192 worked. I even had
to add the line :openfiles-max=infinity:\
to /etc/login.def in the daemon section. Well now the File Descriptors
has increased and even the internet speed is good ( i ll know it
better by tomorrow). I have kept my cache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:17:21 +0530
Preetish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Odd.. are you sure you are really running the new binary, and that the
> > >ulimit setting is done correctly in the start script?
>
> #Squid startup/shutdown
>
> if [ -z $1
> >Odd.. are you sure you are really running the new binary, and that the
> >ulimit setting is done correctly in the start script?
#Squid startup/shutdown
if [ -z $1 ] ; then
echo -n "Syntax is: $0 start stop"
exit
fi
if [ $1 != start -a $1 != stop ]; then
echo -n "Wrong
Preetish wrote:
Hi Everybody
I have recompiled Squid the way i saw in one of the how to. this is what i did
1)I uninstalled Squid
2)
#ulimit -HSn 8192
#then recompiled squid with --with-maxfd=8192
then in my starting squid script i have added ulimit -HSn 8192
But still it shows the same number
On tor, 2007-08-09 at 17:00 +0530, Preetish wrote:
> Hi Everybody
>
> I have recompiled Squid the way i saw in one of the how to. this is what i did
>
> 1)I uninstalled Squid
> 2)
> #ulimit -HSn 8192
> #then recompiled squid with --with-maxfd=8192
> then in my starting squid script i have added u
Hi Everybody
I have recompiled Squid the way i saw in one of the how to. this is what i did
1)I uninstalled Squid
2)
#ulimit -HSn 8192
#then recompiled squid with --with-maxfd=8192
then in my starting squid script i have added ulimit -HSn 8192
But still it shows the same number of file descripto
fre 2007-02-02 klockan 14:25 -0200 skrev Michel Santos:
> >When Squid sees it's short of filedescriptors it stops accepting
> > new requests, focusing on finishing what it has already accepted.
>
> isn't this conflicting with what you said before?
No.
> do squid recover or do it need to be rest
Henrik Nordstrom disse na ultima mensagem:
> fre 2007-02-02 klockan 10:54 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
>
>> If your system or process FD limits are lower than what Squid believes
>> it
>> to be, then yup. It'll get unhappy.
>
> Only temporarily. It automatically adjusts fd usage to what the system
>
fre 2007-02-02 klockan 10:54 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
> If your system or process FD limits are lower than what Squid believes it
> to be, then yup. It'll get unhappy.
Only temporarily. It automatically adjusts fd usage to what the system
can sustain when hitting the limit (see fdAdjustReserved)
tor 2007-02-01 klockan 20:01 -0600 skrev Matt:
> What does Squid do or act like when its out of file descriptors?
When Squid sees it's short of filedescriptors it stops accepting new
requests, focusing on finishing what it has already accepted.
And long before there is a shortage it disables the
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007, Matt wrote:
> What does Squid do or act like when its out of file descriptors? If
> cachemgr says it still has some left could it still really be out?
If your system or process FD limits are lower than what Squid believes it
to be, then yup. It'll get unhappy.
(It generally
What does Squid do or act like when its out of file descriptors? If
cachemgr says it still has some left could it still really be out?
Matt
Original Message-
> From: Mark Elsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 09:26
> To: Gregori Parker
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] FILE DESCRIPTORS
>
> > Sorry to be pounding the list lately, but I'm
...
Gix Lilian
-Original Message-
From: Mark Elsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 09:26
To: Gregori Parker
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] FILE DESCRIPTORS
> Sorry to be pounding the list lately, but I'm about to lo
> Sorry to be pounding the list lately, but I'm about to lose it with
> these file descriptors...
>
> I've done everything I have read about to increase file descriptors on
> my caching box, and now I just rebuilt a fresh clean squid. Before I
> ran configure, I did ulimit -HSn 8192, and I noticed
27;Squid stopped'
;;
esac
From: kabindra shrestha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 7:28 PM
To: Gregori Parker
Subject: Re: [squid-users] FILE DESCRIPTORS
u ve to run the same command "ulimit -HSn 8192&q
Sorry to be pounding the list lately, but I'm about to lose it with
these file descriptors...
I've done everything I have read about to increase file descriptors on
my caching box, and now I just rebuilt a fresh clean squid. Before I
ran configure, I did ulimit -HSn 8192, and I noticed that while
> > I am at 8192 File Descriptors, but am still running out, so I am moving
> > to 16,000 next. I just need to know the ramifications of what I am
> > doing.
>
> Quite likely you have some other problem with the filedescriptor problem
> only being a side effect. 8K filedescriptors is well more than
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Sam Reynolds wrote:
What is the maximum number of File descriptors that you can have?
Depends on your OS.
The default is 1024.
Is there a correlation between the number of File Descriptors and RAM?
YEs, but even more so between file descriptors and CPU usage.
At what
What is the maximum number of File descriptors that you can have?
Is there a correlation between the number of File Descriptors and RAM?
At what point does increasing the number of File Descriptors become a problem?
I am at 8192 File Descriptors, but am still running out, so I am moving to
16,0
cc:
03/11/2003 18:22 Subject: Re: [squid-users] file
descriptors - urgent r
Sorry, I just noticed your question actually said "without a
recompile". In that case, the answer is no: you must recompile to raise
the file descriptor limit in squid.
At 10:55 PM 11/2/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark
FAQ already checked. I just wondered (grasping at straws) if there was
There is, and its in the FAQ. Check
closer. http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.4
At 10:55 PM 11/2/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark
FAQ already checked. I just wondered (grasping at straws) if there was some
way of doing it.
Thanks anyway!
Jeff
-- =
TED]
be> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] file
descriptors - urgent request
03/1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If anyone can give me a definitive response in the next two hours, I would
> be extremely grateful.
>
> I believe that Squid needs a recompile, with a new system fd limit in
> place, in order to increase it's fd limit(?) Is there any way of increasing
> the fd limit
If anyone can give me a definitive response in the next two hours, I would
be extremely grateful.
I believe that Squid needs a recompile, with a new system fd limit in
place, in order to increase it's fd limit(?) Is there any way of increasing
the fd limit for Squid withour a re-compile? System li
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 22.22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> runtime information page it shows squid seeing 1024 file
> descriptors available.
>
> Do I need to recompile squid to fix this?
Most likely yes.
The ulimit set when you compile Squid is built into the Squid binary
and this binary can n
>Now I am having errors show up in my log saying I am running on of file
>descriptors.
Using ulimit (or its equivalent), set the hard and soft limits both
before compiling and before running Squid.
This has been recently discussed on the list (today, I think), and
also several times in the arch
I have finally managed to get WCCPv2 working on my box. Works great.
Now I am having errors show up in my log saying I am running on of file
descriptors.
I have checked my /proc/sys/fs/file-max and /proc/sys/fs/inode-nr files and
they both are set pretty high. When I check the cachemgr runtime
41 matches
Mail list logo
