On 06/10/17 20:04, Vieri wrote:
Hi,
On a Squid server I'm seeing how the buffer mem usage is steadily growing.
You mean mem_node? or the "*K Buffers" entries?
The mem_node is used by cache_mem entries, in-transit objects and some
hot cache_dir index entries. So the value there need to be
On 06/10/17 20:27, Vieri wrote:
OK, I guess I'm starting to understand how Linux manages disk caching, and the meaning of
"buffered".
In fact:
# free -m
totalusedfree shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3209427991074 154
OK, I guess I'm starting to understand how Linux manages disk caching, and the
meaning of "buffered".
In fact:
# free -m
totalusedfree shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3209427991074 154 28220 28810
Swap: 36168
Hi,
On a Squid server I'm seeing how the buffer mem usage is steadily growing.
I'm running out of free memory.
top - 08:34:25 up 37 days, 1:00, 2 users, load average: 1.39, 1.27, 1.36
Tasks: 340 total, 1 running, 339 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.6 us, 0.2 sy, 0.0 ni,
Le 19/08/2017 à 22:08, Eliezer Croitoru a écrit :
> Hey Emmanuel,
>
> Something is not clear to me.
> Are you using url_rewrite or store_id helpers in any form?
No
> Also what DNS lookups squid does exactly?
> - Reverse
> - Forward
Mostly forward
>
> Also:
> - internal clients
> - external domains
-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of FUSTE Emmanuel
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 14:53
To: Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz>; squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users]
Le 24/01/2017 à 10:55, FUSTE Emmanuel a écrit :
> Le 23/01/2017 à 23:41, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
>> On 24/01/2017 3:58 a.m., FUSTE Emmanuel wrote:
>>> All was carefully checked and nothing in my configuration (acl etc ...)
>>> explain why Squid insist to do DNS requests for requests forwarded to
On 22/06/2015 5:28 p.m., Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
UFS or AUFS ? guessing aufs
UFA, AUFS, diskd - all the same in this regard.
Any suggestions on the L1 L2 values, defaults ?
Not particularly. Though others may have preferences. AFAIK the FS
directory index issues in ext2 that L1/L2 exist to
Hi
UFS or AUFS ? guessing aufs
Any suggestions on the L1 L2 values, defaults ?
On 21 June 2015 at 11:57, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 20/06/2015 9:08 p.m., Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
Are there any gotchas i need to look out for.
Also I have allocated a 1T lun to the VM. Whats
Hi
Are there any gotchas i need to look out for.
Also I have allocated a 1T lun to the VM. Whats the best way to
allocate this do I use 1 cache_dir or multiple cache_dir.
I currently have 3, is there a way to migrate the cache objects in the
3 into 1 or do I just delete them and bear the cost of
On 20/06/2015 9:08 p.m., Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
Are there any gotchas i need to look out for.
Also I have allocated a 1T lun to the VM. Whats the best way to
allocate this do I use 1 cache_dir or multiple cache_dir.
The usual one UFS based dir per physical drive and no RAID. That can be
What is the physical memory size ??
You might want to read the faq on memory:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory
Marcus
On 06/19/2015 07:19 AM, Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
I recently push my squid VM memory up to 65G
i pushed up squid usage (i thought) to 40G
squid.conf
cache_mem
First goes first...
Upgrade to 3.5 or 3.4 branch.
Then try to use top or htop to get a snapshot of the virtual memory and
resident memory that squid uses.
Eliezer
On 19/06/2015 13:19, Alex Samad wrote:
this is on centos 6.6
still using the redhat build squid !
rpm -q squid
Hi.
On 12.01.2015 19:06, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I am confident that those types of leaks do not exist at al in Squid 3.4.
These rounds of mmory exhaustion problems are caused by pseudo-leaks,
where Squid incorrectly holds onto memory (has not forgotten it
though) far longer than it should be.
Hi.
On 09.01.2015 06:12, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Grand total:
= 9.5 GB of RAM just for Squid.
.. then there is whatever memory the helper programs, other software
on the server and operating system all need.
I'm now also having a strong impression that squid is leaking memory.
Now, when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yep.
Memory leaking - if it really it - will be occurs on all platforms.
If not - this is OS-specific issue. libc, malloc library problem. But
not squid itself.
12.01.2015 18:06, Eugene M. Zheganin пишет:
Hi.
On 12.01.2015 16:41, Eugene M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yep.
Memory leaking - if it really it - will be occurs on all platforms.
If not - this is OS-specific issue. libc, malloc library problem. But
not squid itself.
12.01.2015 18:06, Eugene M. Zheganin пишет:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks like an OS-specific issue.
I don't see any memory leaking on my boxes (running Solaris 10, yes ;)).
Moreover, helpers is corrrectly got an release memory.
12.01.2015 17:41, Eugene M. Zheganin пишет:
Hi.
On 09.01.2015 06:12, Amos Jeffries
Hi.
On 12.01.2015 16:41, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
I'm now also having a strong impression that squid is leaking memory.
Now, when 3.4.x is able to handle hundreds of users during several
hours I notice that it's memory usage is constantly increasing. My
patience always ends at the point of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/01/2015 8:10 a.m., Doug Sampson wrote:
Hi,
I have the similar problem on FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #1 r275861
with squid-3.4.10. I also applied MEMPOOLS=1 when starting squid.
I experience the process slowing down and unacceptable
performance.
Doug Sampson do...@dawnsign.com writes:
Hi,
I have the similar problem on FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #1 r275861 with
squid-3.4.10. I also applied MEMPOOLS=1 when starting squid. I
experience the process slowing down and unacceptable performance.
Squid is configured
Hi,
I have the similar problem on FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #1 r275861 with
squid-3.4.10. I also applied MEMPOOLS=1 when starting squid. I
experience the process slowing down and unacceptable performance.
Squid is configured to use kerberos and ntlm authentication and lap
group authentication.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I mean,
cache_mem is too big.
First, 600 users is not very big installation to do huge memory cache.
1-2 Gb will be ehough. With fast disk cache.
Second - 4 Gb ram is near 32-bit address limit. Possible 32-bit library
or somewhat meets this
On 26/11/2014 8:59 a.m., Doug Sampson wrote:
Thanks, Amos, for your pointers.
I've commented out all the fresh_patterns lines appearing above
the last two lines.
I also have dropped diskd in favor of using aufs exclusively,
taking out the min-size parameter. I've commented out the
Maybe your problem is related to sysctl mib tuning about
swap/overcommit etc. I did not observed memory leak with squid 3.4.4,
but FB 10 do swap frequently than old version.
Simon
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
I used the ugly tuning: set vm.defer_swapspace_pageouts to 1. But it
is may caused some issue when the physic memory is really exhausted. I
have no much time to investigate the right way, but I think maybe
vm.swap_idle_threshold1/vm.swap_idle_threshold2 or vm.overcommit etc.
maybe harmful.
On 25/11/2014 9:06 a.m., Doug Sampson wrote:
Recently due to squid 2.7 being EOL'ed, we migrated our squid
server to version 3.4.9 on a FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE running on 64-bit
hardware. We started seeing paging file being swapped out
eventually running out of available memory. From the
Recently due to squid 2.7 being EOL'ed, we migrated our squid server to version
3.4.9 on a FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE running on 64-bit hardware. We started seeing
paging file being swapped out eventually running out of available memory. From
the time squid gets started it usually takes about two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/11/2014 9:06 a.m., Doug Sampson wrote:
Recently due to squid 2.7 being EOL'ed, we migrated our squid
server to version 3.4.9 on a FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE running on 64-bit
hardware. We started seeing paging file being swapped out
eventually
On 9/08/2014 6:28 a.m., Nils Hügelmann (anonymoX.net) wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to opensuse 13.1, squid3.4 (same with current 3.HEAD)
leaks memory after a short time and stops responding to snmp queries(not
sure if that's related).
From what version? If it was 3.1 or older they have
Hi,
after upgrading to opensuse 13.1, squid3.4 (same with current 3.HEAD)
leaks memory after a short time and stops responding to snmp queries(not
sure if that's related).
In a test setup i can reproduce the issue as follows:
Test with 100 rps: Everything good
Test with 250 rps: After some
* Various memory leaks
On 27/06/2014 7:20 a.m., Alexandre wrote:
* Various memory leaks
?? are you enjoying 3.4.6 or something?
Amos
Hi all,
I've been running 3.3.5 with NTLM auth an icap service (c-icap with
clamav) and SSL Bump/Dynamic cert, and I've noticed that the squid3
process rapidly consumes almost all of my RAM (12G) within just a few hours:
16143 proxy 20 0 8554m 8.2g 5788 S0 69.6 35:09.43 squid3
My
Squid 3.3.7 is out and there was a new leak that was fixed and might
caused the problem you are referring to.
If you have used my RPM there is an update to 3.3.6 which not includes
the latest patches and a 3.3.7 with all the patches will probably be out
next week since it builds fine.
What
Hi Eliezer,
I build .debs for squeeze, basically copying the debian subdir from the
source packages into the extracted archives and adjusting accordingly
(ie modifying Changelog and deleteting old patches) I tried wheezy but
the OpenSSL 1.0.1 horribly breaks *loads* of sites when using
Hey Alex,
I am unsure about the reason of breakage of these sites since I have
never used squid SSL-BUMP else then compiling it yet.
Claiming it's a specific version of OpenSSL is quite a claim.
If you have tried with another version I would say you can claim it.
I would say that breaking any
Hi Eliezer,
I can tell you that we have come across specific sites that were OK
being bumped in squeeze (which comes with OpenSSL 0.9.8) did not work in
wheezy, which uses 1.0.1.
Here are the example sites we found so far (in the form of acls):
acl nobump dstdomain
Hello,
I'm seeing a lot of memory errors like this at my squid 3.3.4, using
kerberos authentication and ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl for group
mapping. Any known issue?
*** glibc detected *** (ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl): double free or
corruption (out): 0x013f0590 ***
===
Hi, all.
I have strange problem of memory leakage in squid 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.
Squid is grow fast and is killed by oom every day and use before a killing
about 600MB of memory. Interesting thing is that squid 3.2 doesn't fail fully.
Fails only it child process and parent process restart it again.
I just upgraded from 2.7STABLE9 to 3.2.5, and now I'm battling a memory leak.
Squid Cache: Version 3.2.5
configure options: '--prefix=/local/proxy/squid' '--with-maxfd=8192'
'--with-pthreads' '--enable-storeio=aufs' '--enable-removal-policies=heap'
'--enable-cache-digests'
Hi All,
I configured squid box to get good cache performance and for that i
set cache_mem and object size in cache.
cat /etc/squid/squid.conf | grep cache_mem
cache_mem 6144 MB
cat /etc/squid/squid.conf | grep -i maximum_object_size_in_memory
maximum_object_size_in_memory 1 MB
And whenever i
On 21/11/2011 1:33 a.m., benjamin fernandis wrote:
Hi All,
I configured squid box to get good cache performance and for that i
set cache_mem and object size in cache.
cat /etc/squid/squid.conf | grep cache_mem
cache_mem 6144 MB
cat /etc/squid/squid.conf | grep -i maximum_object_size_in_memory
Hi Amos,
Really your support is grateful to us.You always help us to
understanding of squid and its work pattern.Thanks for your kind support.
On 21/11/2011 1:33 a.m., benjamin fernandis wrote:
Hi All,
I configured squid box to get good cache performance and for that i
set cache_mem and
On 21/11/2011 6:06 p.m., Benjamin wrote:
Hi Amos,
Really your support is grateful to us.You always help us to
understanding of squid and its work pattern.Thanks for your kind support.
On 21/11/2011 1:33 a.m., benjamin fernandis wrote:
Hi All,
I configured squid box to get good cache
Hallo,
After port cvsup, updating lib, packages and so on. I got something
weird problem, I guess this cause memory leak.
root:~# free
SYSTEM MEMORY SUMMARY:
mem_used: 574558208 (547MB) [ 53%] Logically used memory
mem_avail: +499183616 (476MB) [ 46%] Logically available
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:42:13 +0700, budsz wrote:
Hallo,
After port cvsup, updating lib, packages and so on. I got something
weird problem, I guess this cause memory leak.
root:~# free
SYSTEM MEMORY SUMMARY:
mem_used: 574558208 (547MB) [ 53%] Logically used memory
mem_avail: +
I'm running Squid 3.1.15 on a server with 24GB of RAM. The OS is SUSE Linix
11 SP1 64bit. If I change the cache_mem higher then 512, I get the below
results. If I leave it at 512, everything is normal. I tried 1024 MB and up
to 4096 MB with the same results below. Any ideas?
Memory usage for
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM, michael_gra...@cadc.uscourts.gov wrote:
I'm running Squid 3.1.15 on a server with 24GB of RAM. The OS is SUSE Linix
11 SP1 64bit. If I change the cache_mem higher then 512, I get the below
results. If I leave it at 512, everything is normal. I tried 1024 MB
Subject:Re: [squid-users] Memory Problems
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:24 PM, michael_gra...@cadc.uscourts.gov wrote:
I'm
On 28/06/11 23:00, Go Wow wrote:
I forgot to mention the other day, I searched for latest versions rpm
and couldn't find it. Do you know of any location which provides rpms
for centos 5.4.
I'm afraid not. I have been unable to track down any packaging
maintainer for CentOS. They have 2.6
That's good to hear.
ps aux | wc -l shows me 165
ps aux | grep squid |wc -l shows me 46
ps aux | grep httpd |wc -l shows me 10
ps aux | grep perl |wc -l shows me 7
What are these rest 100 processes used for, below is the extract of my
ps aux command.
http://pastebin.com/0ZVDAL0S
Thanks for
On 28/06/11 19:12, Go Wow wrote:
That's good to hear.
ps aux | wc -l shows me 165
ps aux | grep squid |wc -l shows me 46
ps aux | grep httpd |wc -l shows me 10
ps aux | grep perl |wc -l shows me 7
What are these rest 100 processes used for, below is the extract of my
ps aux command.
Good Lord!!!
The amount of free RAM in my system keeps decreasing, What happens
when it RAM reaches to zero? Is it that it remove old object and free
up space?
On 28 June 2011 11:45, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 28/06/11 19:12, Go Wow wrote:
That's good to hear.
ps aux | wc
Good Lord!!!
The amount of free RAM in my system keeps decreasing, What happens
when it RAM reaches to zero? Is it that it remove old object and free
up space?
It is probably being used by buffer and cache.
free -m enter
should show you how much available memory and cache there is.
free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 3722 3011710 0305 1352
-/+ buffers/cache: 1353 2369
Swap: 2047 21 2025
Do I genuinely require to increase the memory of
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Memory issues
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3722 3011 710 0 305 1352
-/+ buffers/cache: 1353 2369
Swap: 2047 21 2025
Do I genuinely require to increase the memory of this system?
No. It looks good.
I don't understand where you came up
2011 14:14, Jenny Lee bodycar...@live.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Memory issues
free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3722 3011 710 0 305 1352
-/+ buffers/cache: 1353 2369
Swap: 2047 21 2025
Do I genuinely require to increase the memory of this system?
No. It looks
On 28/06/11 22:31, Go Wow wrote:
Look at these graphs which shows swap being used.
Memory usage -- http://img.myph.us/Cr8.jpg
CPU usage -- http://img.myph.us/PgM.jpg
The squid box is serving only 12 users now, the plan is to implement
this for 150 users and maybe more in future. I dont want
I forgot to mention the other day, I searched for latest versions rpm
and couldn't find it. Do you know of any location which provides rpms
for centos 5.4.
On 28 June 2011 14:42, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 28/06/11 22:31, Go Wow wrote:
Look at these graphs which shows swap
Pls find below the link to excel file containing memory info from
squid cache manager.
https://www.yousendit.com/download/MFo3c0w5bTh0TW14dnc9PQ
Now my squid.conf looks like this, is this okay?
auth_param negotiate program /usr/lib/squid/squid_kerb_auth -d -s GSS_C_NO_NAME
auth_param negotiate
Any info for me regarding my last post?
On 27 June 2011 13:02, Go Wow gow...@gmail.com wrote:
Pls find below the link to excel file containing memory info from
squid cache manager.
https://www.yousendit.com/download/MFo3c0w5bTh0TW14dnc9PQ
Now my squid.conf looks like this, is this okay?
On 27/06/11 21:02, Go Wow wrote:
Pls find below the link to excel file containing memory info from
squid cache manager.
https://www.yousendit.com/download/MFo3c0w5bTh0TW14dnc9PQ
Shows Squid using 4MB of RAM.
Now my squid.conf looks like this, is this okay?
Looks fine now.
snip
Are
Hi,
I'm using squid 3.1.8 on centos 5.4 with 3.8GB RAM and Dual Core
Processor. My swap is been used and 50% of RAM is used by cache
buffers. Below link has one week's memory CPU utilization
information in form of graph.
Memory usage -- http://img.myph.us/Cr8.jpg
CPU usage --
On 26/06/11 21:24, Go Wow wrote:
Hi,
I'm using squid 3.1.8 on centos 5.4 with 3.8GB RAM and Dual Core
Processor. My swap is been used and 50% of RAM is used by cache
buffers. Below link has one week's memory CPU utilization
information in form of graph.
Memory usage --
I have not used squid for quite a few months, so many stuff has lost
from my memory, :)
How can I config squid with memory only cache system? I have 16G
memory but the content size is only 4G.
Thanks.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:12:17 +0800, Jeff Pang wrote:
I have not used squid for quite a few months, so many stuff has lost
from my memory, :)
How can I config squid with memory only cache system? I have 16G
memory but the content size is only 4G.
Thanks.
- erase all existing cache_dir entries
Hi,
(sending again because ezlm didn't like my attaches before)
we've got squid 2.7.STABLE7, running on Ubuntu 10.04, as reverse
proxy for OWA 2007 (or Exchange 2007; excuse me if there are differences, I
don't know much about Windows products). It has been recompiled with
The memory leak is caused by idnsGrokReply: the caller
of rfc1035MessageUnpack should free the memory using
rfc1035MessageDestroy.
The function idnsGrokReply has several changes between
3.0.x and 3.1.x.
It is obvious that not all paths call rfc1035MessageDestroy
but I do not know this code and
Hello list,
I just wanted to post the results with valgrind.
Unfortunately the memcheck thread needs so much CPU that I could not
put a high load on the squid as maximum only about 5-10 req/s.
# ./squid -v
Squid Cache: Version 3.1.3
configure options: '--prefix=/appl' '--localstate=/var'
Thank you for your info, I will give it a try.
Martin
Marcus Kool marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote on 17.06.2010 16:15:09:
Martin,
Valgrind is a memory leak detection tool.
You need some developer skills to run it.
If you have a test environment with low load you may want
to give it a
Hello,
I just wanted to report back the last tests:
After the memory cache is filled to 100% the squid (3.1.4 or 3.1.3)
still needs more memory over time when under load, about 1-2 GB a day.
memory_pool off did not change anything, the process size still rises.
The high CPU usage seem to start
Martin,
Valgrind is a memory leak detection tool.
You need some developer skills to run it.
If you have a test environment with low load you may want
to give it a try.
- download the squid sources
- run configure with CFLAGS=-g -O2
- run squid with valgrind
- wait
- kill squid with a TERM
Hello list,
I have a question regarding memory and CPU usage change from 3.0 to 3.1.
I have 4 forwards proxies with ICAP (c-icap and clamav), NTLMv2
authentication, all four proxies each have about 200-400 req/sec
on RedHat AS5 64bit servers with each 16GB mem for about 15k to 30k users.
martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question regarding memory and CPU usage change from 3.0 to 3.1.
I have 4 forwards proxies with ICAP (c-icap and clamav), NTLMv2
authentication, all four proxies each have about 200-400 req/sec
on RedHat AS5 64bit
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote on 15.06.2010 10:48:33:
martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question regarding memory and CPU usage change from 3.0 to
3.1.
I have 4 forwards proxies with ICAP (c-icap and clamav), NTLMv2
martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote on 15.06.2010 10:48:33:
martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
Hello list,
I have a question regarding memory and CPU usage change from 3.0 to
3.1.
I have 4 forwards proxies with
Hi All,
can it be said as a generalization that one can allocate/fix 1/4 of physical
ram for cache mem objects. Will it holds true even when you are running
multiple instances???
please guide that how memory handling will be occuring in multiple instances
setup???cache_mem will
fre 2010-05-21 klockan 06:38 + skrev GIGO .:
can it be said as a generalization that one can allocate/fix 1/4 of
physical ram for cache mem objects. Will it holds true even when you
are running multiple instances???
I would not generalize a rule like that. It is a reasonable
Thank you for explaining well
regards,
Bilal
From: hen...@henriknordstrom.net
To: gi...@msn.com
CC: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 09:53:06 +0200
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Memory Considerations when you are running
multiple
ons 2010-03-31 klockan 16:04 -0500 skrev Kevin Blackwell:
Should i be concerned about Total in use: 3539 KB 96%?
No. The % is % of the total memory the Squid process has reserved from
the OS, not the maximum possible.
Contrary to intuition the situation where one should worry about this %
is
1st, I'm not sure this is good, and this is right after a restart
Memory usage for squid via mallinfo():
Total space in arena:3180 KB
Ordinary blocks: 3035 KB 2 blks
Small blocks: 0 KB 0 blks
Holding blocks: 504 KB 2 blks
From: Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz
Actual experienced measurements from some general-purpose web caches. On
32-bit
systems. Newer 64-bit systems have reported a 15MB/GB requirement.
It's the amount of data seen to be used for index meta data and other types
of
index.
...
The
John Doe wrote:
From: Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz
Actual experienced measurements from some general-purpose web caches. On 32-bit
systems. Newer 64-bit systems have reported a 15MB/GB requirement.
It's the amount of data seen to be used for index meta data and other types of
index.
...
On 30.06.09 13:13, martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
I checked -- cached objects are not re-checked, at least not with two or
three hours.
But the memory usage is higher still without icap while the cache is still
filling -- but this may due to the fact that I configured
I checked -- cached objects are not re-checked, at least not with two or
three hours.
But the memory usage is higher still without icap while the cache is still
filling -- but this
may due to the fact that I configured squid to cache objects only up to 1
MB and icap scans larger objects, too.
On 25.06.09 15:39, martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
I have a question regarding memory usage for squid. I have 4 proxies, each
has about 200-400 req/s and 2-5 MB/s with ntlm_auth and about 1000 lines
of acl,
squid version is 3.0.STABLE15 on Redhat AS 5 Linux.
They are
Hi Everybody,
I have a question regarding memory usage for squid. I have 4 proxies, each
has about 200-400 req/s and 2-5 MB/s with ntlm_auth and about 1000 lines
of acl,
squid version is 3.0.STABLE15 on Redhat AS 5 Linux.
They are busy servers and therefore have no disk cache but memory cache
The squid process grows without bounds here. I've read the FAQ, and
tried lowering cache_mem setting, decreasing cache_dir size. That
server has 4GB physical memory, and with total cache_dir size setting
to 60G, squid resident size still can grow beyond bound and start
eating swap.
Note
Bin Liu wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
# /usr/local/squid/sbin/squid -v
Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE6
configure options: '--prefix=/usr/local/squid' '--with-pthreads'
'--with-aio' '--with-dl' '--with-large-files'
'--enable-storeio=ufs,aufs,diskd,coss,null'
I've already set memory_pools off in squid.conf, so squid should
free all unused memory. But I can still see these lines in cachemgr
after running for some time:
memPoolAlloc calls: 549769495
memPoolFree calls: 545292412
Did I miss something?
Regards
Bin Liu wrote:
I've already set memory_pools off in squid.conf, so squid should
free all unused memory. But I can still see these lines in cachemgr
after running for some time:
memPoolAlloc calls: 549769495
memPoolFree calls: 545292412
Did I miss something?
Usually this turns out to be
Thanks for your reply.
# /usr/local/squid/sbin/squid -v
Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE6
configure options: '--prefix=/usr/local/squid' '--with-pthreads'
'--with-aio' '--with-dl' '--with-large-files'
'--enable-storeio=ufs,aufs,diskd,coss,null'
'--enable-removal-policies=lru,heap' '--enable-htcp'
Gregori Parker wrote:
Glad to help David, please let us know how it progresses.
Dont know if you saw this in the archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/squid-users@squid-cache.org/msg19824.html but it might help guide you on your SO_FAIL issue. It might be worth moving to LRU and establishing
David Tosoff wrote:
Thanks Chris.
I had already read both of the wiki post and the thread you directed me to
before I posted this to the group.
Excellent.
I already had compiled heap into my squid before this issue happened. I am using heap
GDSF. And, I wasn't able to find
David Tosoff wrote:
Thanks Chris.
I had already read both of the wiki post and the thread you directed me
to before I posted this to the group.
Excellent.
I already had compiled heap into my squid before this issue happened. I
am using heap GDSF. And, I wasn't able to find
what I want to be using
here? The SO_FAIL's concern me, but I'm not sure if they should?
Thanks!
David
--- On Sat, 4/4/09, David Tosoff dtos...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: David Tosoff dtos...@yahoo.com
Subject: [squid-users] Memory-only Squid questions
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Received
David Tosoff wrote:
Hey all, haven't heard anything on this and could really use some help. :)
You can disregard the HIT related questions, as once I placed this into a full
scale test, it started hitting from memory wonderfully (~40% offload from the
origin)
Good news...
The config
crobert...@gci.net wrote:
From: Chris Robertson crobert...@gci.net
Subject: Re: [squid-users] ...Memory-only Squid questions
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Received: Monday, April 6, 2009, 4:56 PM
David Tosoff wrote:
Hey all, haven't heard anything on this and could
really use some help
[mailto:dtos...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Mon 4/6/2009 8:46 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org; Chris Robertson
Subject: Re: [squid-users] ...Memory-only Squid questions
Thanks Chris.
I had already read both of the wiki post and the thread you directed me to
before I posted this to the group.
I already had
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
