Hello,
Well im looking for a better solution than MS ISA proxy, we have 3000
users that uses 4 ISA proxy servers, and its a managment nightmare so
im going to attempt to use squid+dansguardian, on the squid side of
things i cant find anything about using it in a large orginization and
with the us
Dear team,
I run a Squid Cache: Version 3.1.8. i have a problem when my
client_http.requests = is more than 200/sec. pages doesn't browse but
when the request are less than 200 i dont find any problem. i don't
see any errors in /etc/var/squid/cache.log. my file descriptors is
32768.
Please find m
I'm complete newbie in the Squid and Linux worlds (I've lived in a different
world for far too long). I just joined the wagon about a month ago. I need
your inputs on how to set up a high performance Squid box:
My hardware details:
Machine: Dell PowerEdge 1600SC
CPU: Intel Xeon 2.0GHz, 533Mz FSB
what is the squid performance parameter that shows me
how much efficient it is?
what is the squid parameter that shows me how much
bandwidth have saved?
I refer to calamaris reports.
Yours, Daniel Navarro
Maracay, Venezuela
www.csaragua.com/ecodiver
_
Hi
I am running squid 2-5-10 stable on Redhat 9 as transparent proxy. Box
is having 2 GB memory.
As per my squid config
Cache_mem 256 mb
maximum_object_size_in_memory 200 KB
maximum_object_size 1024 KB
cache_replacement_policy heap GDSF
memory_replacement_policy heap GDSF
half_closed_clients off
Hi all, is there any website where I can find papers and reports on the
performance of squid (e.g. what is the optimal cache disk size..., max
memory size?
Thanks
Liz
_
Find it on the web with MSN Search. http://search.msn.com.s
Hello all,
I would like to test the squid's performance like
bytes actualy fetched from the squid's local
cache/memory or from the real internet. Is there is
any software available?
TIA
John
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
hi
I need some testing data about squid performance
thanks
chen.song
2006-11-22
Hello to all
I am working in ISP. As i deployed squid on fc5. users are Complaining
that they are getting slower browsing response (transparent cache).
but as i configure direct access to Internet there isn't any complain.
any idea.
Hello, all!
We are creating large proxy instalation with content filtering.
Squid is defined as a proxy. Cache is not needed.
How many requests per second can squid handle?
Sure it depends on cpu,memory,hdd - suppose we can take the best hardware.
Anyway this will be cluster with network
Dear All,
I would like to configure Squid as a reverse proxy HTTP / SSL acceleration solution.
Could someone tell me how fast we can achieve using Squid (request / sec)? I am
thinking of using new Itanium 1.5GHz CPU running either Linux or HP-UX. Anyone has
any idea?
Thanks,
Joseph
* Jason Martina :
> Hello,
>
> Well im looking for a better solution than MS ISA proxy, we have 3000
> users that uses 4 ISA proxy servers, and its a managment nightmare so
> im going to attempt to use squid+dansguardian, on the squid side of
> things i cant find anything about using it in a larg
On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Jason Martina wrote:
Hello,
Well im looking for a better solution than MS ISA proxy, we have 3000
users that uses 4 ISA proxy servers, and its a managment nightmare so
im going to attempt to use squid+dansguardian, on the squid side of
things i cant find anything
donovan jeffrey j wrote:
On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Jason Martina wrote:
Hello,
Well im looking for a better solution than MS ISA proxy, we have 3000
users that uses 4 ISA proxy servers, and its a managment nightmare so
im going to attempt to use squid+dansguardian, on the squid side of
t
Le lundi 12 octobre 2009 10:11:03, Jason Martina a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Well im looking for a better solution than MS ISA proxy, we have 3000
> users that uses 4 ISA proxy servers, and its a managment nightmare so
> im going to attempt to use squid+dansguardian, on the squid side of
> things i ca
I have some Dell 1950 servers dedicated to squid in my production
environment. Each with 16GB RAM and 300G disk
As the website traffic grows, the load of squid becomes high at high
traffic time. Average load is higher than 10.
Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/srkB/swkB/s avgrq-sz
Hi all,
Sorry for the long email.
I'm using squid on a 300Mbps ISP with about 10,000 users.
I have an 8-core I7 Intel processor-machine, with 8GB of RAM and 500
of HD for the cache. (exclusive Sata HD with xfs). Using aufs as
storeio.
I'm caching mostly multimedia files (youtube and such).
On 23/10/10 03:01, Ananth wrote:
Dear team,
I run a Squid Cache: Version 3.1.8. i have a problem when my
client_http.requests = is more than 200/sec. pages doesn't browse but
when the request are less than 200 i dont find any problem. i don't
see any errors in /etc/var/squid/cache.log. my file d
Hello All,
I have been trying to benchmark the performance of squid for sometime
now for plain HTTP and HTTPS traffic.
The key performance indicators that i am looking at are Requests Per
Second(RPS), Throughput(mbps) and Latency (ms).
My test methodology looks like this
generator(apache benchm
For only 30 clients, you really don't need to spend that much cash on such a
high specced server! A simple Duron/Celeron based system with 256 or maybe
512MB RAM would more than suffice! Our ISP provided cache/firewall servers
at least 100 simultaneous client machines and is nothing more than
>
> what is the squid performance parameter that shows me
> how much efficient it is?
Define efficient.
> what is the squid parameter that shows me how much
> bandwidth have saved?
>
http://www.squid-cache.org/Scripts/
M.
Maybe I don't know how to make the correct question.
I already have webalizer, SARG, Squid
Logbuchauswertung and calamaris.
What are the important parameters to measure and what
does they mean?
What tells me how many pages or files are taking from
cache instead of internet?
What tells me how mu
Hi Daniel,
proxy efficiency: it compares the time for fetching objects from the
cache to objects fetched from the internet. It shows you how fast your
cache can deliver objects. Of course, this value should be > 0,
otherwise you have a bottleneck. The higher the efficiency, the better
performs you
On 8/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running squid 2-5-10 stable on Redhat 9 as transparent proxy. Box
> is having 2 GB memory.
> As per my squid config
> Cache_mem 256 mb
> maximum_object_size_in_memory 200 KB
> maximum_object_size 1024 KB
> cache_replacement_pol
-Original Message-
From: Mark Elsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:53 AM
To: Lokesh Khanna
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid - performance
On 8/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am ru
On 8/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What parameters do I need to check to get best performance and caching.
> My squid is currently handling 80 req/sec and during peak hours nearly
> 1500 users uses caching server.
That is a respectable traffic volume.
IMHO, the best thing
On 16.08 21:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using 2 Scsi hard disk of 36 GB for cache. I have assigned only 15
> GB ( less than 50 % of total disk ) for cache in each disk .
> So total cache is 30 GB.
>
> cache_dir diskd /cache1/squid 15360 16 256 Q1=64 Q2=72
> cache_dir diskd /cache2/squid 1
]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:15 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid - performance
On 16.08 21:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using 2 Scsi hard disk of 36 GB for cache. I have assigned only
15
> GB ( less than 50 % of total disk ) for cache in eac
On 8/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks
> What parameter do I need to poll to check object hit rate?
Cachemgr -> General runtime information.
> There are other parameters also like Byte Hit rate, request Hit ratio
> etc. How can I get detail on this. Is there any websi
'm working for an ISP company and I'm using squid as a cache engine
for the first time.
when a dial-up user downloads a cached file originally form a local
server, the download rate is 10 kbps, but if the origin server is
anywhere else on the Internet the download rate of a previously cached
file w
Hi,
We are having some performance issues with squid:
The setup is like this:
1. a bunch of short acls with special exceptions (hosts and stuff)
2. a 279 line whitelist, type: regex -i
3. a 5755 line blacklist, type: regex -i
4. various small acls (authentication is somewhere here).
I had
>
> Hi all, is there any website where I can find papers and
> reports on the
> performance of squid (e.g. what is the optimal cache disk
> size..., max
> memory size?
>
The optimal cache size depends on the size of your use
community and their 'web behavior' : rule of thumb.
About one we
Hello all,
I have been using squid for quite some time, and I just installed squid here
at my office on a big dual Xeon Compaq Proliant server. Unfortunately
however, I have been having some severe performance issues. Browsing
through the proxy is SLOW. I have found the following in the log:
C
Hello all,
I have been using squid for quite some time, and I just installed squid here
at my office on a big dual Xeon Compaq Proliant server. Unfortunately
however, I have been having some severe performance issues. Browsing
through the proxy is SLOW. I have found the following in the log:
C
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to test the squid's performance like
> bytes actualy fetched from the squid's local
> cache/memory or from the real internet. Is there is
> any software available?
>
http://www.web-polygraph.org/
M.
Hello,
>From the last 2 months our users have been complaining that internet
access is very very slow and downloading files taking lot of
time. Sometimes downloading doesn't happen/stops in between. .
This is my nework setup:
client > [ Dansguardian + Squid Proxy] -> [Gateway Antivirus
嵩陈 schrieb:
hi
I need some testing data about squid performance
We too. If you have done some testing, you might be willing to share
your data.
[And ist would help if your name would be something else than "??"].
Jakob Curdes
On 05.03.07 10:20, Ammad Shah wrote:
> I am working in ISP. As i deployed squid on fc5. users are Complaining
> that they are getting slower browsing response (transparent cache).
intercepting, not transparent.
> but as i configure direct access to Internet there isn't any complain.
what if yo
For Slow browsing check your DNS settings in squid and in FC5,,, if
the download speed is good in squid but browsing has problem, check
the DNS. But for best performance I suggest this combination:
FreeBSD 5 series (specially 5) + squid 2.5 series.
regrads
nima
On 3/5/07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:51 +0430, nima sadeghian wrote:
> For Slow browsing check your DNS settings in squid and in FC5,,, if
> the download speed is good in squid but browsing has problem, check
> the DNS. But for best performance I suggest this combination:
> FreeBSD 5 series (specially 5) + squ
Hi
Please tell me about the Box (CPU, HD, RAM) and the squid.conf file
modifications, are you using WCCP?
Ammad Shah escribió:
Hello to all
I am working in ISP. As i deployed squid on fc5. users are Complaining
that they are getting slower browsing response (transparent cache).
but as
On fre, 2007-08-10 at 19:03 +0400, Alexey Ivlev wrote:
> How many requests per second can squid handle?
Without cache and not too complex ACLs about 700-2000 depending on the
CPU power. It uses a single CPU only so multicore CPUs or SMP don't
improve the situation much.
On multicore/SMP servers
Hi,
I am running squid-2.5.STABLE4 on Linux 8.0 box.
Server is Intel P4, 256 DDR, 40 GB IDE Hard drive.
Everything works fine in initial stages. No error in
cache.log file. No problem with access.log file.
Cache works fine.
Facing two problem. Don't know what is the cause.
1) As cache size incre
For several years, I've used Webalizer to generate periodic web reports
detailing Squid activity and the crufty, old NLANR scripts to generate
extremely plain weekly reports. Both Webalizer and NLANR generate reports
from the client perspective.
I have a requirement to generate a different report
W dniu 2011-08-18 08:19, Chen Bangzhong pisze:
I have some Dell 1950 servers dedicated to squid in my production
environment. Each with 16GB RAM and 300G disk
As the website traffic grows, the load of squid becomes high at high
traffic time. Average load is higher than 10.
Device: rrqm/s
> Median Service Times (seconds) 5 min 60 min:
> HTTP Requests (All): 0.00865 0.00865
> Cache Misses: 0.01035 0.01035
> Cache Hits: 0.0 0.0
> Near Hits: 0.00091 0.00091
> Not-Modified Replies: 0.0 0.0
>
My cached objects will expire after 10 minutes.
Cache-Control:max-age=600
I don't know why there are so many disk writes and there are so many
objects on disk.
In addtion, Disk hits as % of hit requests: 5min: 1.6%, 60min: 1.9%
is very low.
Can I increase the cache_mem？ or not use disk cache at
2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong :
> My cached objects will expire after 10 minutes.
>
> Cache-Control:max-age=600
Static content like pictures should cache longer, like 1 day, 86400.
> I don't know why there are so many disk writes and there are so many
> objects on disk.
>
> In addtion, Disk hits as %
On 18/08/11 19:40, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong:
My cached objects will expire after 10 minutes.
Cache-Control:max-age=600
Static content like pictures should cache longer, like 1 day, 86400.
Could also be a whole year. If you control the origin website, set
caching times
2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries :
> On 18/08/11 19:40, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> 2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong:
>>>
>>> My cached objects will expire after 10 minutes.
>>>
>>> Cache-Control:max-age=600
>>
>> Static content like pictures should cache longer, like 1 day, 86400.
>
> Could also be a whole year. I
thanks you Amos and Drunkard.
My website hosts novels, That's, user can read novel there.
The pages are not truely static contents, so I can only cache them for
10 minutes.
My squids serve both non-cachable requests (works like nginx) and
cachable-requests (10 min cache). So 60% cache miss is re
2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries :
> On 18/08/11 19:40, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> 2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong:
>>>
>>> My cached objects will expire after 10 minutes.
>>>
>>> Cache-Control:max-age=600
>>
>> Static content like pictures should cache longer, like 1 day, 86400.
>
> Could also be a whole year. I
Mean Object Size: 20.61 K
maximum_object_size_in_memory 1024 KB
So most objects will be save in RAM first, still can't explain why
there are so many disk writes.
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
1.520.001.636.950.00 89.91
Device:
On 18/08/11 22:50, Chen Bangzhong wrote:
thanks you Amos and Drunkard.
My website hosts novels, That's, user can read novel there.
The pages are not truely static contents, so I can only cache them for
10 minutes.
My squids serve both non-cachable requests (works like nginx) and
cachable-reque
On 18/08/11 22:56, Chen Bangzhong wrote:
> Mean Object Size: 20.61 K
> maximum_object_size_in_memory 1024 KB
>
> So most objects will be save in RAM first, still can't explain why
> there are so many disk writes.
>
Well, I would check the HTTP response headers there. Make sure they are
con
On 18/08/11 22:53, Kaiwang Chen wrote:
2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries:
On 18/08/11 19:40, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong:
I don't know why there are so many disk writes and there are so many
objects on disk.
All traffic goes through either RAM cache or if its bigger than
maxi
thanks.
Before I try the gateway squid solution, I want to change one of my
squid to use memory cache only. I have 16GB RAM. now cache_mem is set
to 5GB.
I will try to increase it to 12GB and set cache_dir to null schma. I
do this because I am sure that my hot objects can be saved in RAM,
non-hot
2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries :
> On 18/08/11 22:53, Kaiwang Chen wrote:
>>
>> 2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries:
>>>
>>> On 18/08/11 19:40, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong:
>
>
> I don't know why there are so many disk writes and there are so many
> objects on disk.
>>>
在 2011年8月18日 下午9:07，Amos Jeffries 写道：
> On 18/08/11 22:56, Chen Bangzhong wrote:
>> Mean Object Size: 20.61 K
>> maximum_object_size_in_memory 1024 KB
>>
>> So most objects will be save in RAM first, still can't explain why
>> there are so many disk writes.
>>
>
> Well, I would check the HTT
On 19/08/11 02:40, Kaiwang Chen wrote:
2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries:
On 18/08/11 22:53, Kaiwang Chen wrote:
2011/8/18 Amos Jeffries:
On 18/08/11 19:40, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
2011/8/18 Chen Bangzhong:
I don't know why there are so many disk writes and there are so many
objects on disk.
On 19/08/11 02:10, Chen Bangzhong wrote:
thanks.
Before I try the gateway squid solution, I want to change one of my
squid to use memory cache only. I have 16GB RAM. now cache_mem is set
to 5GB.
I will try to increase it to 12GB and set cache_dir to null schma. I
do this because I am sure that
Amos, I want to find out what is filling my disk at 2-3MB/s. If there
is no cache related information in the response header, will squid
write the response to the disk?
In squid wiki, I found the following sentences:
Responses with Cache-Control: Private are NOT cachable.
Responses with Cache-Co
On 19/08/11 02:59, Kaiwang Chen wrote:
在 2011年8月18日 下午9:07，Amos Jeffries 写道：
On 18/08/11 22:56, Chen Bangzhong wrote:
Mean Object Size: 20.61 K
maximum_object_size_in_memory 1024 KB
So most objects will be save in RAM first, still can't explain why
there are so many disk writes.
Well
On 19/08/11 03:58, Chen Bangzhong wrote:
Amos, I want to find out what is filling my disk at 2-3MB/s. If there
is no cache related information in the response header, will squid
write the response to the disk?
In squid wiki, I found the following sentences:
Responses with Cache-Control: Private
help
narrow it down.
> -Original Message-
> From: Felipe W Damasio [mailto:felip...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 9:37 PM
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: [squid-users] Squid performance issues
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the long e
Hi Mr. John,
2010/1/26 John Lauro :
> What does the following give:
> uname -a
uname -a:
Linux squid 2.6.29.6 #4 SMP Thu Jan 14 21:00:42 BRST 2010 x86_64
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU @ 9200 @ 2.67GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
> While it's being slow, run the following to get some stats:
>
> vmstat 1
Felipe W Damasio wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for the long email.
I'm using squid on a 300Mbps ISP with about 10,000 users.
I have an 8-core I7 Intel processor-machine, with 8GB of RAM and 500
of HD for the cache. (exclusive Sata HD with xfs). Using aufs as
storeio.
I'm caching mostly multimedia
Hi Mr. Robertson,
2010/1/26 Chris Robertson :
>> Do you have any idea or any other data I can collect to try and
>> track down this?
>>
>
> Check your log rotation schedule. Is it possible that logs are being
> rotated at midnight? I think that the swap.state file is rewritten when
> "squid
Felipe W Damasio wrote:
Hi Mr. Robertson,
2010/1/26 Chris Robertson :
Do you have any idea or any other data I can collect to try and
track down this?
Check your log rotation schedule. Is it possible that logs are being
rotated at midnight? I think that the swap.state file is
Hi Mr. Robertson,
2010/1/26 Chris Robertson :
>> I don't use -k rotate.
>>
> Err... Really? Last I heard, calling "squid -k rotate" (aside from the
> obvious logfile rotation) prunes the swap.state file. Not doing so would
> lead to your swap.state growing without bounds.
Should I?
Is
Felipe W Damasio wrote:
Hi Mr. Robertson,
2010/1/26 Chris Robertson :
I don't use -k rotate.
Err... Really? Last I heard, calling "squid -k rotate" (aside from the
obvious logfile rotation) prunes the swap.state file. Not doing so would
lead to your swap.state growing without
Felipe W Damasio wrote:
Hi Mr. Robertson,
2010/1/26 Chris Robertson :
Do you have any idea or any other data I can collect to try and
track down this?
Check your log rotation schedule. Is it possible that logs are being
rotated at midnight? I think that the swap.state file is rewritten
From: Felipe W Damasio [mailto:felip...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 10:06 PM
>> To: John Lauro
>> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid performance issues
>>
>> Hi Mr. John,
>>
>> 2010/1/26 John Lauro :
Both your CPU and disk both look ok based on these, and not enough
difference from baseline to explain the change in timing of the command.
I'll look at the netstats a little more later to see if I spot anything.
Can you test the equivalent outside of squid? Maybe it's just your internet
or ama
Hi Mr. Lauro,
2010/1/27 John Lauro :
> I'll look at the netstats a little more later to see if I spot anything.
>
> Can you test the equivalent outside of squid? Maybe it's just your internet
> or amazon being slow and it has nothing to do with squid...?
I thought that too, so I tried "link
Hi all,
I'm busy testing a squid box with 8xSATA drives, 4gig of DDRII
memory and 2x 2.6gig dual core processors. I'm using the basic datacomm test
from polygraph. I've configured 6 of the drives to use COSS, and the other
two diskd (I've also done basic ufs tests). During all of the tests
On 20/06/2013 8:00 p.m., Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
Hello All,
I have been trying to benchmark the performance of squid for sometime
now for plain HTTP and HTTPS traffic.
The key performance indicators that i am looking at are Requests Per
Second(RPS), Throughput(mbps) and Latency (ms).
My test m
On 06/20/2013 06:51 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
If anyone is interested with very detailed benchmarks, then I can provide them.
Yes please :-)
PS. could you CC the squid-dev mailing list as well with the details. The more
developer eyes we can get on this data the better. Although please do
On 06/20/2013 02:00 AM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
> My test methodology looks like this
>
> generator(apache benchmark)<--->squid<-->server(lighttpd)
...
> These results show that squid is NOT CPU bound at this point. Neither
> is it Network IO bound because i can get much more throughput w
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Alex Rousskov
wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 02:00 AM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
>
>> My test methodology looks like this
>>
>> generator(apache benchmark)<--->squid<-->server(lighttpd)
> ...
>> These results show that squid is NOT CPU bound at this point. Neither
>>
On 06/20/2013 10:47 PM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> On 06/20/2013 02:00 AM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
>>> My test methodology looks like this
>>>
>>> generator(apache benchmark)<--->squid<-->server(lighttpd)
>> ...
>>> These results show
>
>
>> I want to share the results with the community on the squid wikis. How
>> to do that?
>
>
> We are collecting some ad-hoc benchmark details for Squid releases at
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks. So far this is not
> exactly a rigourous testing, although following the m
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Marcus Kool
wrote:
>
>
> On 06/20/2013 06:51 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> If anyone is interested with very detailed benchmarks, then I can provide
>>> them.
>>
>>
>> Yes please :-)
>>
>> PS. could you CC the squid-dev mailing list as well with the details
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Alex Rousskov
wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 10:47 PM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>> On 06/20/2013 02:00 AM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
My test methodology looks like this
generator(apache benchmark)<-
>
>
> I understand that Amos is eager to get more tests and more results about
> the latest enhancements, but as Amos himself also stated earlier, please
> use a released version of Squid for testing since the test results for
> 3.3.x or 3.4.x are interesting for admins of Squid who can consider
>
On 06/21/2013 04:34 AM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
>>> Then the question becomes why squid is slowing down?
>>
>> I think there are 2.5 primary reasons for that:
>>
>> 1) Higher concurrency level ("c" in your tables) means more
>> waiting/queuing time for each transaction: When [a part of] one
>> tran
On 21/06/2013 10:34 p.m., Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Alex Rousskov
wrote:
On 06/20/2013 10:47 PM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 06/20/2013 02:00 AM, Ahmed Talha Khan wrote:
My test methodology looks like this
> 'm working for an ISP company and I'm using squid as a cache engine
> for the first time.
> when a dial-up user downloads a cached file originally form a local
> server, the download rate is 10 kbps, but if the origin server is
> anywhere else on the Internet the download rate of a previously cac
On 2/22/06, Mark Elsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 'm working for an ISP company and I'm using squid as a cache engine
> > for the first time.
> > when a dial-up user downloads a cached file originally form a local
> > server, the download rate is 10 kbps, but if the origin server is
> > anywher
sön 2006-06-25 klockan 18:47 +0300 skrev E.S. Rosenberg:
> 2. a 279 line whitelist, type: regex -i
>
> 3. a 5755 line blacklist, type: regex -i
Are you sure these two should be regex:es? regex lists should only be
used as a very last resort if none of the structured acls fits..
> 1. The blackli
Hi,
I understand that the size of the physical RAM has to be proportional to the
total harddisk cache size. Supposing I have
unlimited physical RAM,
1) What is the recommended size of 1 physical harddisk for each server (each
server can have sda, sdb etc...). The reason I
am asking this is that
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have been using squid for quite some time, and I just
> installed squid here
> at my office on a big dual Xeon Compaq Proliant server. Unfortunately
> however, I have been having some severe performance issues. Browsing
> through the proxy is SLOW. I have found the fol
I have a test bed using siege. The test runs 23400 hits against 19
static http items. Squid, delivering all from memory, runs roughly
75% of the throughput of raw Apache or Apache proxy. The siege
"client" box has plenty of ports so that TIME_WAIT is not an issue.
The client and server
> Is there something that analyzes the various "*_HIT" statuses in the log
> and produces a "what might have been report"? Does anyone know of any
> tools that are not listed on the Squid Cache web site that would provide
> this type of report?
Your requirements sound like you are looking for a c
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Jay Turner wrote:
> > Is there something that analyzes the various "*_HIT" statuses in the log
> > and produces a "what might have been report"? Does anyone know of any
> > tools that are not listed on the Squid Cache web site that would provide
> > this type of report?
>
>
ge home page is at:
http://www.boutell.com/wusage/
John Kent
Webmaster
Naval Research Laboratory
Monterey, CA
-Original Message-
From: Jay Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 5:26 PM
To: Merton Campbell Crockett; Squid Users List
Subject: RE: [squ
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Jay Turner wrote:
> > Is there something that analyzes the various "*_HIT" statuses in the log
> > and produces a "what might have been report"? Does anyone know of any
> > tools that are not listed on the Squid Cache web site that would provide
> > this type of report?
>
>
Hi guys,
I am sorry if this is a question which has been asked for many times,
but I did not find any actual question concerning the performance of
recent versions of squid.
We are trying to replace a commercial product with squid servers on
64bit linux servers (most likely red hat 5). At the mom
Do some system-level profiling runs (oprofile under Linux, dtrace under
Solaris) during the fill phase, the disk intensive phase and the disk
overload phase. Are you graphing statistics? Can you graph stuff like
CPU, swapping/paging, disk IO?
Whats cache_mem set to?
Adrian
On Thu, Nov 08, 200
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007, Dave Raven wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been looking for a way to do the profiling, but I'm stuck with
> FreeBSD 4 - any ideas? Cache_mem is at 96mb, its almost definitely getting
> filled immediately - I've also tried setting it to 8 just to be sure, no
> difference...
Hm. Fre
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
