Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-12 Thread Nick Fennell
Hey Amos. I was waiting for that! We have a few requirements not yet satisfied in Squid 3.x, storeurl_rewrite features are a big one, so we're having to hold off until we're able to conjure something up. Can't get them ported across can you? ;-) WIth regard to 2.7, ZPH, are you aware of any

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 12/02/2013 10:31 p.m., Nick Fennell wrote: Hey Amos. I was waiting for that! We have a few requirements not yet satisfied in Squid 3.x, storeurl_rewrite features are a big one, so we're having to hold off until we're able to conjure something up. Can't get them ported across can you? ;-)

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-12 Thread Nick Fennell
Hey Amos. I believe we're already testing the package provided by Eliezer and have encountered some issues with the current workings. I know we'll be in touch with him shortly to discuss. Hopefully it's something fixable but he'll know more when we do :) Thanks for the reply/info. Nick --

[squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-11 Thread Nick Fennell
Hi. I have a situation where it seems the 'zph_sibling' is not tagging traffic with it's defined ToS mark. I have two units configured to be siblings of each other. Both have the Digest and Proxy options enabled. I have a simple enough zph enabled; {{{ zph_mode tos zph_local 0x30

Re: [squid-users] Squid 2.7STABLE9 'zph_sibling' seemingly not tagging traffic

2013-02-11 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 12/02/2013 12:18 a.m., Nick Fennell wrote: Hi. Hi Nick, 2.7 series Squid is no longer supported or receiving bug fixes. Is there any particular reason you have not yet upgraded to 3.2 or 3.3? Amos