Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
lör 2006-11-18 klockan 22:22 +0100 skrev Andrew Miehs: > I do not understand why one wouldn't use > > acl accelerated_list dst 1.2.3.4 > > Shouldnt this only allow squid ONLY to try to connect to here, just > in case > someone makes a mess of the cache_peer lines? http_access is on the req

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-18 Thread Andrew Miehs
I do not understand why one wouldn't use acl accelerated_list dst 1.2.3.4 Shouldnt this only allow squid ONLY to try to connect to here, just in case someone makes a mess of the cache_peer lines? As for which http_headers they send - who cares... Or am I missing something... Andrew

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
fre 2006-11-17 klockan 14:24 -0900 skrev Chris Robertson: > http_port 2000 # Make squid listen on port 2000* Almost. Accelerator mode also needs at least one of defaultsite=your.main.website vhost > cache_peer 1.2.3.4 parent 2000 0 no-query originserver > acl accelerated_server dst 1.2.3.4

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Chris Robertson
Mohan wrote: Chris, that worked... well sorta.. I am seeing these messages in my access logs and on the browser I see "Invalid Request" . Could be missing some acl stuff ? 1163809785.556 3 10.169.155.217 TCP_DENIED/400 1638 GET error:invalid-request - NONE/- text/html 1163809796.231

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Mohan
Chris, that worked... well sorta.. I am seeing these messages in my access logs and on the browser I see "Invalid Request" . Could be missing some acl stuff ? 1163809785.556 3 10.169.155.217 TCP_DENIED/400 1638 GET error:invalid-request - NONE/- text/html 1163809796.231 38 10.169.155.2

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
fre 2006-11-17 klockan 12:52 -0800 skrev Mohan: > I am using squid 2.6 and I > need to setup transparent caching for a webserver running on a port > other than 80. We have a webserver running on port 2000 . I have spent > quite a number of hours trying to figure out in changing this default > setti

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Chris Robertson
Mohan wrote: Chris Robertson wrote on 11/17/2006, 2:30 PM: > Mohan wrote: > > I am using squid 2.6 and I > > need to setup transparent caching for a webserver running on a port > > other than 80. We have a webserver running on port 2000 . I have spent > > quite a number of hours trying to f

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Mohan
Chris, Thanks for responding. As you can see I am still confused between the two. I thought in 2.6 Reverse proxy was replaced by InterceptionProxy. Did I get that wrong ? I probably did! How are the two different ? I need to be able to install a cache proxy alongside my webserver to cache s

Re: [squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Chris Robertson
Mohan wrote: I am using squid 2.6 and I need to setup transparent caching for a webserver running on a port other than 80. We have a webserver running on port 2000 . I have spent quite a number of hours trying to figure out in changing this default setting. Is there a way to change this ? Fir

[squid-users] Transparent caching : using non default http port

2006-11-17 Thread Mohan
I am using squid 2.6 and I need to setup transparent caching for a webserver running on a port other than 80. We have a webserver running on port 2000 . I have spent quite a number of hours trying to figure out in changing this default setting. Is there a way to change this ?