On 10/03/2016 12:15 a.m., Vito A. Smaldino wrote:
> Hi guys,
> in my high-school i operate a squid+squidguard box with great satisfaction
> and zero problems; actually it is configured as an explicit proxy.
> Now i need to change the operation mode to implicit (transparent,
> intercept) due to
Hi guys,
in my high-school i operate a squid+squidguard box with great satisfaction
and zero problems; actually it is configured as an explicit proxy.
Now i need to change the operation mode to implicit (transparent,
intercept) due to Eduroam policy.
Googling i found docs and examples all refering
Hi list,
I'm running Squid 3.3 on Linux as part of a wireless hotspot solution.
The box has two network interfaces: one to the outside world, the
other a private LAN with IP 10.0.0.1. On the LAN I'm using CoovaChilli
as an active portal.
I'd like to transparently intercept and cache web traffic
I'm wanting to know whether this is a capability of squid, or if anyone
knows another FOSS product that can do it.
The scenario:
I have an upstream firewall and proxy that I do not control, and the
only access to the internet is via the proxy, which uses proxy basic
authentication (and is
On 02/12/10 17:17, Alex King wrote:
I'm wanting to know whether this is a capability of squid, or if anyone
knows another FOSS product that can do it.
The scenario:
I have an upstream firewall and proxy that I do not control, and the
only access to the internet is via the proxy, which uses
Dayo Adewunmi wrote:
Hi,
We use squid on our main server and I'm trying to set up a transparent
proxy
for one user. This transparent proxy would have our main squid as its
parent,
and the user won't have to make any changes in their browser. This is
necessary,
because the user has no admin
Hi all!
I wonder how I can accomplish transparent proxying of HTTPS through Squid.
I'm using
- FreeBSD 6.2
- OpenBSD's PF
- Squid 2.6.17 with transparent PF and SSL
Currently I have normal HTTP traffic working, but I can't get HTTPS traffic
working ... I wonder if it is possible at all.
I dont think its technical possible to realize a transparent https proxy.
Greetings
Karl
Bert Moorthaemer wrote:
Hi all!
I wonder how I can accomplish transparent proxying of HTTPS through Squid.
I'm using
- FreeBSD 6.2
- OpenBSD's PF
- Squid 2.6.17 with transparent PF and SSL
Currently I
Hi Hemant,
I have compiled a small How-To for running Squid + FreeBSD + WCCP on a
Cisco 3620 and 7206 router.
I am currently using this WCCP2 configuration on 2 of my production
FreeBSD-6.x Squid boxes with a Cisco 3620 router with IOS 12.2.
I think it should also work for your Cisco 1841
Hi Masters,
I am trying to implement squid as
transparent proxy. I have installed squid on freebsd 6.1.
The router which I am using is cisco 1841 series router. I
am using wccpv2. Could you please help me out with how
could I make it a transparent proxy.
Thanking you,
Hemant.
What is the squid vershion u r running. if it is squid 2.6
pls add below line.
http_port 3128 transparent
acl mynet src 192.168.101.0/24
http_access allow mynet
if it is SQUID 2.5 , you may nedd something like these.
http_port 3128
cache_mem 64 MB
cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid 100 16
On 10/9/07, Indunil Jayasooriya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Indunil,
Thank you so much for your kind help. I am
using squid 2.6. Where do I add these lines.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth2 --dport 80
-j REDIRECT --to-port 3128.
OH, SORRY for the above rule.
Hi Hemant,
Hemant Raj Chhetri wrote:
Hi Masters,
I am trying to implement squid as
transparent proxy. I have installed squid on freebsd 6.1.
The router which I am using is cisco 1841 series router. I
am using wccpv2. Could you please help me out with how
could I make it a transparent proxy.
On tis, 2007-10-09 at 15:21 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
To connect all the related pieces of information, you can use the
following keywords in google and search:
Squid + FreeBSD + Cisco + WCCP
There is also a lot of information in the Squid FAQ and Wiki.
Regards
Henrik
Dear All,
before i have squid 2.5.stable 13 and then i want to transparent and
get authentication in each user who's connected to internet using
their browser. And then i found squid2.6 stable which support
auth-on-accell. my problem is howto make transparent proxy in squid
2.6stable ?.
mån 2006-07-03 klockan 13:06 +0700 skrev RdBSD:
before i have squid 2.5.stable 13 and then i want to transparent and
get authentication in each user who's connected to internet using
their browser.
Not possible I am afraid. This is not something you can do in a proxy
using proxy
Hi!
I'm trying to configure transparent proxying with Squid and Linux
2.6/netfilter.
I think I have it working for clients that use the squid box as
standard gateway (the FAQ is pretty clear on how to do that), but I'd
also like http requests originating from the same host as squid is
running on
Hi all,
Is there any way to detect transparent squid-proxy running?
I want to share my internet connection, so that administrator
couldn't detect this. I decided to use transparent proxying in squid.
Will this work for me?
Giedrius
PS. Thanks for answers and sorry for bad english.
Giedrius wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to detect transparent squid-proxy running?
I want to share my internet connection, so that administrator
couldn't detect this. I decided to use transparent proxying in squid.
Will this work for me?
Nothing's impossible to detect. It really depends on how
Russ Uhte wrote:
Giedrius wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to detect transparent squid-proxy running?
I want to share my internet connection, so that administrator
couldn't detect this. I decided to use transparent proxying in squid.
Will this work for me?
Nothing's impossible to detect. It
Giedrius wrote:
Russ Uhte wrote:
Giedrius wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to detect transparent squid-proxy running?
I want to share my internet connection, so that administrator
couldn't detect this. I decided to use transparent proxying in squid.
Will this work for me?
Nothing's impossible to
Russ Uhte wrote:
It really depends on what you call easy. Some people are better at
recognizing patterns than others, and that would be what was really
needed to detect a transparent proxy.
Ok I got it. And about non transparent proxying? Is it more difficult to
detect it?
Again, I reiterate,
Giedrius wrote:
Russ Uhte wrote:
It really depends on what you call easy. Some people are better at
recognizing patterns than others, and that would be what was really
needed to detect a transparent proxy.
Ok I got it. And about non transparent proxying? Is it more difficult to
detect it?
I
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Giedrius wrote:
Is there any way to detect transparent squid-proxy running?
Depends what is beeing looked for.
I want to share my internet connection, so that administrator
couldn't detect this. I decided to use transparent proxying in squid.
Will this work for me?
No
I have already setup squid + iptables to work as a transparent proxying. But i have
made an enhancement (kinda), squid now listens on port 8080 and dansguardian listening
of port 3128. Ive done this because i dont want to reconfigure all workstations here,
so they believe that they are still
For various reasons I need to run squid transparently proxying but not on
the firewall.
eg:
firewall(normal gateway) - 192.168.0.1
squid box - 192.168.0.2
2k clients - 192.168.0.x (gateway set to .2)
To do this I have set the squid box as default route on the clients and
configured squid 2.5 to
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 1:12 pm, Daniel Barron wrote:
For various reasons I need to run squid transparently proxying but not on
the firewall.
eg:
firewall(normal gateway) - 192.168.0.1
squid box - 192.168.0.2
2k clients - 192.168.0.x (gateway set to .2)
To do this I have set the
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Daniel Barron wrote:
For various reasons I need to run squid transparently proxying but not on
the firewall.
Then you need to teach the firewall to route port 80 traffic to the Squid
server without chaning the destination IP address, and your Squid server
need to know to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Barron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
This problem has only started happening since I upgraded the squid box from
a RH6.2 to a RH8.
I thought it might be icmp redirects so have switched it off in
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects
but
Hey everyone,
Transparent proxying still got me stumped!.
I installed via a rpm so I didn't specify any options during the
'configure' of the makefile.
Again, I can access web sites perfectly fine if I specify the proxy ip
and port in the web browser but when I use transparent proxying by the
Gentlman,
I'm facing the following scenario. One machine with three NICs, one
internal and two WAN ( external ) interfaces. Now, I want all the HTTP (
port 80 ) traffic to be sent through WAN #1 with squid, and all the rest
through WAN #2.
My idea is to do it with IPFW, adding the following
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 16.47, CPD - Equipe de Segurança wrote:
Now, the default route points to the WAN #2 router , so I'm sure I
need an extra route for the WAN#1 interface.
Has anyone ever got into this mess?
I do things like this quite often, but on Linux.
The technology you need to use
I've been using the --enable-ipf-transparent option
for a while now. Mainly under FreeBSD 4.x
I'm fairly cetain I had this work when I was on 5.0
but after updating to 5.1 I get this in the configure script:
checking if IP-Filter header files are installed... no
WARNING: Cannot find necessary
You have to _manually_ copy the header files from /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter
to /usr/include/netinet
-Original Message-
From: Adam Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been using the --enable-ipf-transparent option
for a while
Hi Everyone,
I have looked through the FAQs but could not find an answer to my
doubts.
I was wondering whether the following scenario can be implemented or
not:
- A user logs on a Win 2K box authenticated via an LDAP server
- Opens up a browser that has NOT been configured to use a
proxy
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:19:06AM +, Richard Barrett wrote:
And which particular branch of the secret police are you commissioning this
system for?
Probably the ones that pay for the infrastructure that the people are
using - it is called reporting and, it can, save your arse by
I am trying to get transparent proxying to work on Solaris 8 in the case
where there is no HOST header in a request.
Transparent proxying in the case where there is a HOST header works.
The reason I want to support the no HOST header case is that there is an
application that I want to proxy that
37 matches
Mail list logo
