tor 2010-09-09 klockan 11:36 +0530 skrev Babu Chaliyath:
Hi List,
I am trying to get mrtg graphing of my squid box running freebsd 7.2
with squid 3.1.0.13, I was able to get the mrtg while running 2.6
version of squid, but once moved to 3.1 version, I am not able to get
the mrtg graph at
2010/9/9 Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net:
tor 2010-09-09 klockan 11:36 +0530 skrev Babu Chaliyath:
Hi List,
I am trying to get mrtg graphing of my squid box running freebsd 7.2
with squid 3.1.0.13, I was able to get the mrtg while running 2.6
version of squid, but once moved to
On 09/09/10 21:38, Babu Chaliyath wrote:
2010/9/9 Henrik Nordströmhen...@henriknordstrom.net:
tor 2010-09-09 klockan 11:36 +0530 skrev Babu Chaliyath:
Hi List,
I am trying to get mrtg graphing of my squid box running freebsd 7.2
with squid 3.1.0.13, I was able to get the mrtg while running 2.6
I have authentication via negotiate_kerb_auth working a charm, with a
secondary helper for basic via ntlm_auth
This works a charm. However the negotiate_kerb_auth helper only supports
NTLMv2 and this causes some applications, mostly Web Conferencing
applications, Live Meeting, WebEx etc, to fail
mån 2010-06-21 klockan 19:11 +1000 skrev Rob Price:
I have authentication via negotiate_kerb_auth working a charm, with a
secondary helper for basic via ntlm_auth
This works a charm. However the negotiate_kerb_auth helper only supports
NTLMv2 and this causes some applications, mostly Web
Hi Squid users,
I think I need some help to understand a new error with squid. :(
I've got several squid boxes, all in 3.0 branch (reverse proxy cache).
All is ok.
Now, I've tried to upgrade one (and only one boxe) to 3.1 branch
(Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.3 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu...).
David B. wrote:
Hi Squid users,
I think I need some help to understand a new error with squid. :(
I've got several squid boxes, all in 3.0 branch (reverse proxy cache).
All is ok.
Now, I've tried to upgrade one (and only one boxe) to 3.1 branch
(Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.3 for
Le 08/06/2010 11:12, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
David B. wrote:
Hi Squid users,
I think I need some help to understand a new error with squid. :(
I've got several squid boxes, all in 3.0 branch (reverse proxy cache).
All is ok.
Now, I've tried to upgrade one (and only one boxe) to 3.1 branch
tis 2010-06-01 klockan 23:51 -0300 skrev Murilo Moreira de Oliveira:
Hi guys. I'm using squid 3.1.4 and since of first 3.1 stable release
I'm suffering from memory leak problems too.
Are you using delay pools?
Regards
Henrik
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit :
hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid 3.1.xx?
yes, alll it is possible
but with 3.1 there is a limitation. i mean squid31 is unable to identify same
video stream with different url
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit :
hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid 3.1.xx?
yes, alll it is possible
but with 3.1 there is a limitation. i mean squid31 is unable to identify same
video stream with
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:39:48, Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac a écrit :
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit :
hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid
3.1.xx?
yes, alll it is possible
but with 3.1 there is a
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:39:48, Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac a écrit :
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit :
hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid
3.1.xx?
yes,
Hi guys. I'm using squid 3.1.4 and since of first 3.1 stable release
I'm suffering from memory leak problems too. My production server is a
CentOS 5.4 32 bits (kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5). It has 2GB of RAM
(512MB reserved to squid cache_mem) and 6GB of disk space reserved to
squid's disk cache. In
mån 2010-05-24 klockan 00:47 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
I mean the ExtremeCarpFrontend configuration examples.
990rps was simply the limit reached on the testing hardware. There may
be hardware able to go faster already.
Or a reverse proxy with high memory hit ratio on slower hardware.
Wow. Sure thats hits/sec and not hits/minute?
The 'extreme' setups of Squid-2.7 only reached 990req/sec.
I'm running squid3.0 on Dell R300 servers with 4x2.8GHz Intel Xeons and 12GB of
ram. On production servers I'm getting
max 1500hits/s. With 2500hits/s I have seen that some in
Henrik Nordström wrote:
lör 2010-05-22 klockan 15:08 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Wow. Sure thats hits/sec and not hits/minute?
The 'extreme' setups of Squid-2.7 only reached 990req/sec.
990 isn̈́'t the extreme.. but very high.
I mean the ExtremeCarpFrontend configuration examples.
990rps was
lör 2010-05-22 klockan 15:08 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Wow. Sure thats hits/sec and not hits/minute?
The 'extreme' setups of Squid-2.7 only reached 990req/sec.
990 isn̈́'t the extreme.. but very high.
Regards
Henrik
Hi, I've run into problems after upgrading 3.0.STABLE19 (installed from
packages) to squid 3.1
I'm running amd64 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD, with squid as accelerated proxy.
3.0.STABLE19 runs almost flawlessly. I'm getting 'Select loop Error' every
second:
2010/05/21 14:37:34| Select loop Error. Retry
alter...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I've run into problems after upgrading 3.0.STABLE19 (installed from
packages) to squid 3.1
I'm running amd64 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD, with squid as accelerated proxy.
3.0.STABLE19 runs almost flawlessly. I'm getting 'Select loop Error' every
second:
2010/05/21
ons 2010-05-12 klockan 17:20 +0200 skrev Daemen, Martin:
after upgrading squid from 2.7 to 3.1 there is an strange upload behavior.
Right now, the progress bar during the upload seem to show the upload in
realtime. So if we upload 15MB through our proxy to an webserver at the
internet, we
Hi
We have found a problem with Squid 3.1 on Solaris
With ICAP enabled all pages over 49150 bytes fail to load. Squid returns an
ICAP error page.
Squid sends an incomplete RESPMOD to the ICAP server. It sends chunks totalling
49150 bytes and then fails to send a final 0 byte chunk. (256 byte
From: Franz Angeli [mailto:franz.ang...@gmail.com]
I configured one debian box with squid 3.1 (compiling it with ssl
support) enabling sslBump feature with a self signed certificate,
obviously browser and
applications warn about the certificate but all seems to work.
Is there a way to use
Hi,
I need for testing purpose (i have to test and debug several mobile
phone java application some of that using https/ssl) to intercept and
decrypt https traffic;
I configured one debian box with squid 3.1 (compiling it with ssl
support) enabling sslBump feature with a self signed certificate,
From: Franz Angeli [mailto:franz.ang...@gmail.com]
I configured one debian box with squid 3.1 (compiling it with ssl
support) enabling sslBump feature with a self signed certificate,
obviously browser and
applications warn about the certificate but all seems to work.
Is there a way to use
Hi Christos
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry that was my mistake, I removed some sensitive info from the location
header URL but forgot to modify the null-body value.
It should have read null-body=100 (I removed 60 chars/bytes). You might be
right and it might still be out by two. I will have a
Hi,
Just resending the correct request and response:
ICAP Request from Squid:
REQMOD icap://10.1.1.25:1344/reqmod ICAP/1.0\r\n
Host: 10.1.1.25:1344\r\n
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:25:39 GMT\r\n
Encapsulated: req-hdr=0, null-body=398\r\n
Allow: 204\r\n
\r\n
GET http://c.proxy.com/www.test.com/
Hi
I had a look at the null-body values. They correctly match the length of the
HTTP 302 response headers block. The extra two bytes is an extra line return.
You can see that after the last header there are three '\r\n' line returns. I
tried removing one of them but the result was the same.
I
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:10:04 +0100, Niall O'Cuilinn
nocuil...@amdocs.com wrote:
Hi
I had a look at the null-body values. They correctly match the length of
the HTTP 302 response headers block. The extra two bytes is an extra
line
return. You can see that after the last header there are three
Hi,
I have recently moved from Squid 3.0 to Squid 3.1. I am trying to integrate it
with an ICAP server.
I am having a problem where Squid 3.1 is rejecting some responses from the
ICAP server which Squid 3.0 accepted.
The response in question is a REQMOD response where the ICAP server is
Niall O'Cuilinn wrote:
Hi,
I have recently moved from Squid 3.0 to Squid 3.1. I am trying to integrate it
with an ICAP server.
I am having a problem where Squid 3.1 is rejecting some responses from the
ICAP server which Squid 3.0 accepted.
The response in question is a REQMOD response
hello list I'm compiling squid 3.1 and wanted to know which option
should I choose to set it as ebtables + bridge + squid3
if - enable-linux-netfilter or enable-linux-tproxy?
Thanks
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:12:15 -0300, Ariel lauchafernan...@gmail.com
wrote:
hello list I'm compiling squid 3.1 and wanted to know which option
should I choose to set it as ebtables + bridge + squid3
if - enable-linux-netfilter or enable-linux-tproxy?
Thanks
--enable-linux-netfilter
Amos
hi all
i setup my squid proxy follow this url
kernel version iptables all match Minimum Requirements
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4#Feature:_TPROXY_version_4.1.2B-_Support
some diffenernt
ip route add default via isp'gateway dev ppp0 table 100
my squid.conf
#Recommended
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:56 +0800 skrev Dong-Yuan Shih:
when i start my squid proxy
the traffic is via ppp0 to internet
but url filter rule is notworking !
Is there anything in access.log?
Regards
Henrik
2010/3/8 Henrik Nordstrom hen...@henriknordstrom.net:
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:56 +0800 skrev Dong-Yuan Shih:
when i start my squid proxy
the traffic is via ppp0 to internet
but url filter rule is notworking !
Is there anything in access.log?
Regards
Henrik
there is nothing
Dong-Yuan Shih wrote:
2010/3/8 Henrik Nordstrom hen...@henriknordstrom.net:
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:56 +0800 skrev Dong-Yuan Shih:
when i start my squid proxy
the traffic is via ppp0 to internet
but url filter rule is notworking !
Is there anything in access.log?
Regards
Henrik
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
Recently I decided to look on 3.1 branch on my test proxy. Everything
seems to work fine, but I'm stuck with the problem with the error
messages.
Whatever I do with the error_directory/error_default_language settings
(leaving 'em commented
Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
Recently I decided to look on 3.1 branch on my test proxy. Everything
seems to work fine, but I'm stuck with the problem with the error messages.
Whatever I do with the error_directory/error_default_language settings
(leaving 'em commented out, or setting 'em to
Hi.
Recently I decided to look on 3.1 branch on my test proxy. Everything
seems to work fine, but I'm stuck with the problem with the error messages.
Whatever I do with the error_directory/error_default_language settings
(leaving 'em commented out, or setting 'em to something) in my browser I
Hey Thanx Henrik,
And Amos,
Yes Definitely I can test them for sure.
I here to do any help I can offer
Regards
Babs
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
Babu Chaliyath wrote:
Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
The client info
Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1,
cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2
... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1
The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and cacheClientAddressType
added
tis 2009-11-03 klockan 17:25 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers may cease to exists when
their data sources go away and new number appear as new info gets
published, but existing numbering should not change...
Converting IPv4 address fields to
Babu Chaliyath wrote:
Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1,
cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2
... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1
The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and
Hi List,
Struggling to get mrtg working with squid. No values shown in the mrtg graph.
My System as follows
OS Freebsd 7.2
Squid 3.1.0.14
Snmpwalk 5.4.2.1
mrtg 2.16.2
Squid snmp acls are working fine as I am getting results with following command
#snmpwalk -m /usr/local/etc/squid/mib.txt -v2c
Babu Chaliyath wrote:
Hi List,
Struggling to get mrtg working with squid. No values shown in the mrtg graph.
My System as follows
OS Freebsd 7.2
Squid 3.1.0.14
Snmpwalk 5.4.2.1
mrtg 2.16.2
Squid snmp acls are working fine as I am getting results with following command
#snmpwalk -m
mån 2009-11-02 klockan 23:47 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source
code. There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1.
Hmm.. what kind of changes?
MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers may cease to exists when
Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source code.
There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE20
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.14
Hi, thanx for the reply
Yes I am using the
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
mån 2009-11-02 klockan 23:47 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source
code. There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1.
Hmm.. what kind of changes?
MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
so the problem was not 3.1 uses too many connections but 2.7 drops
connections when it should not.
A bit funny ;)
I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between
the
Amos Jeffries wrote:
You have IPv6 disabled in your system somehow.
Squid opens IPv4/IPv6 hybrid sockets to receive and send both v4 and v6
traffic in one socket for simplicity and ease of transition. If that fails
like in your case it falls back to IPv4-only sockets.
I recommend
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm running squid in this setup:
client - squid - dansguardian - squid - teh interwebs
When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm
seeing a constant 252
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
so the problem was not 3.1 uses too many connections but 2.7 drops
connections when it should not.
A bit funny ;)
I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between
the Squid in front of dansguardian.
client - squid_in_front -
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk:
so the problem was not 3.1 uses too many connections but 2.7 drops
connections when it should not.
A bit funny ;)
I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between
the Squid in front of dansguardian.
Silamael wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
You have IPv6 disabled in your system somehow.
Squid opens IPv4/IPv6 hybrid sockets to receive and send both v4 and v6
traffic in one socket for simplicity and ease of transition. If that fails
like in your case it falls back to IPv4-only sockets.
I
I'm running squid in this setup:
client - squid - dansguardian - squid - teh interwebs
When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm
seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes (the maximum).
Is squid-3.1
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
I'm running squid in this setup:
client - squid - dansguardian - squid - teh interwebs
When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm
seeing a constant
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm running squid in this setup:
client - squid - dansguardian - squid - teh interwebs
When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm
seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes
* Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm running squid in this setup:
client - squid - dansguardian - squid - teh interwebs
When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm
mån 2009-10-12 klockan 16:48 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I'm running squid in this setup:
client - squid - dansguardian - squid - teh interwebs
When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error:
2009/10/11 10:56:30| Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.0.14 for
i486-pc-linux-gnu...
2009/10/11 10:56:30| Process ID 19416
2009/10/11 10:56:30| With 4096 file descriptors available
2009/10/11 10:56:30| Initializing IP Cache...
2009/10/11 10:56:30| comm_open:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error:
My other squid instance reports:
2009/10/11 11:30:57| comm_udp_sendto: FD 6, (family=10) 127.0.0.1:53: (97)
Address family not supported by protocol
2009/10/11 11:30:57| idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (97)
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error:
My other squid instance reports:
2009/10/11 11:30:57| comm_udp_sendto: FD 6, (family=10) 127.0.0.1:53: (97)
Address family not supported by protocol
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:05:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error:
2009/10/11 10:56:30| Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.0.14 for
i486-pc-linux-gnu...
2009/10/11 10:56:30| Process ID 19416
2009/10/11 10:56:30| With 4096 file
Silamael wrote:
Hello together,
Is there any possiblity to realize a round robin scheduling for requests
sent to ICAP services? Goal is to forward each HTTP request to the next
available ICAP service due to load balancing issues.
As far as i read the configuration manual, there is no option
Silamael wrote:
Silamael wrote:
Hello together,
Is there any possiblity to realize a round robin scheduling for requests
sent to ICAP services? Goal is to forward each HTTP request to the next
available ICAP service due to load balancing issues.
As far as i read the configuration manual, there
Hello together,
Is there any possiblity to realize a round robin scheduling for requests
sent to ICAP services? Goal is to forward each HTTP request to the next
available ICAP service due to load balancing issues.
As far as i read the configuration manual, there is no option to to
this. Can this
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
This is the first I've heard of the problem. Thank you for pointing it
out along with the fix.
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/HEAD/changesets/squid-3-
10004.patch
Thanks Amos,
I've patched our servers
I have a site with several squid servers setup as shown here
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4
All the Tproxy functionality is working fine.
Now I would like to enable cache-peer sibling proxy-only to avoid
duplication of objects between each server's hard drive.
The servers sit in
Michael Bowe wrote:
I have a site with several squid servers setup as shown here
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4
All the Tproxy functionality is working fine.
Now I would like to enable cache-peer sibling proxy-only to avoid
duplication of objects between each server's hard
Hello,
I have a question regarding squid 3.1.
I'd like to authenticate my users based on their AD group membership.
In the previous squid version this was possible with ntlm_auth
--require-membership-of=DOMAIN\\Group
From what I understand ntlm_smb_lm_auth is the successor to ntlm_auth?
And there
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:37:55 +0200, Bammer Sebastian
sebastian.bam...@wienerberger.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a question regarding squid 3.1.
I'd like to authenticate my users based on their AD group membership.
In the previous squid version this was possible with ntlm_auth
I am having trouble getting squid 3.1 configured with icap and clamav.
I have it working with squid 3.0 but using the information on
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/ICAP I just get ICAP
communication failed, nothing is getting logged in the icap logs so I
am fairly sure that it is a squid
fulanpeng wrote:
Hi,
I have a Squid reverse proxy running with SSL support. People can
access it with https://domainA.com. No problem.
Now I want to set up another Squid proxy server to proxy it with SSL
support.
That means https://domainA -- https://domainB.
My configuration
tis 2009-08-11 klockan 02:38 -0700 skrev chrischni:
this is our cache_peer config:
cache_peer 10.xxx.xxx.xxx parent 443 0 ssl no-query originserver login=PASS
front-end-https=on sslkey=//usr/newrprgate/CertAuth/sslkey.key
sslcert=//usr/newrprgate/CertAuth/sslcert.cert name=*.*.com
Probably
Henrik Nordstrom-5 wrote:
tis 2009-08-11 klockan 02:38 -0700 skrev chrischni:
this is our cache_peer config:
cache_peer 10.xxx.xxx.xxx parent 443 0 ssl no-query originserver
login=PASS
front-end-https=on sslkey=//usr/newrprgate/CertAuth/sslkey.key
tis 2009-08-11 klockan 08:47 -0700 skrev chrischni:
am i getting this wrong, or does that mean, that we don´t need to specify a
sslcert in the cache_peer line?
Only if you want Squid to authenticate to the webserver using a client
side certificate.
should he connect to the sharepoint with
Hi,
I have a Squid reverse proxy running with SSL support. People can
access it with https://domainA.com. No problem.
Now I want to set up another Squid proxy server to proxy it with SSL support.
That means https://domainA -- https://domainB.
My configuration file is similar like this for the
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Silamael wrote:
Francois Cami wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Silamael silam...@coronamundi.de
wrote:
Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released?
Thanks in advance!
Silamael wrote:
Francois Cami wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Silamael silam...@coronamundi.de wrote:
Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released?
Thanks in advance!
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseProcess#head-eea0e990c0003af12917552175691a5120980cdd
Thanks for
Amos Jeffries wrote:
We don't exactly date things here. With everyone working on voluntary
time its unpredictable. Though there has been a fairly regular 4-week
cycle for new X.Y.0.z beta releases.
For planning and upgrade testing, 3.1.0.6 is a fairly stable point to
begins with.
Back
Hello there!
Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released?
Thanks in advance!
-- Matthias
Francois Cami wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Silamael silam...@coronamundi.de wrote:
Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released?
Thanks in advance!
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseProcess#head-eea0e990c0003af12917552175691a5120980cdd
Thanks for the reply but
Any update on how this testing has gone?
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
3.1 is certainly ready for testing. That's why we started making beta
releases (3.1.0.X).
Please give it a try and report back your findings. I don't think this
is a setup that is commonly tested so it's very good if you can
Hi,
I would like to setup squid proxy server for NTLM proxying (i.e.
connection pinning) + ICAP (clamav). I hope someone could advise if
there is any catch I need to pay attention with.
Thanks a lot.
John Mok
3.1 is certainly ready for testing. That's why we started making beta
releases (3.1.0.X).
Please give it a try and report back your findings. I don't think this
is a setup that is commonly tested so it's very good if you can test
this now while the release is actively being tested.
Regards
3.1 is certainly ready for testing. That's why we started making beta
releases (3.1.0.X).
Please give it a try and report back your findings. I don't think this
is a setup that is commonly tested so it's very good if you can test
this now while the release is actively being tested.
Regards
Henrik Nordstrom yazmış:
On lör, 2008-11-01 at 14:05 +0200, İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
I'm suspecting it may be gcc-3.3 related. Is there a more recent gcc
version you can upgrade to and try again?
Amos
Opps i am already using gcc version 3.3.5 . ;) . I have just checked it...
Is
Amos Jeffries yazmış:
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Hi there,
I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try
to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ?
Thanks
ismail
Some details about the errors would be helpful.
Others have managed to get it to work
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Amos Jeffries yazmış:
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Hi there,
I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try
to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ?
Thanks
ismail
Some details about the errors would be helpful.
Others have
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Amos Jeffries yazmış:
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Amos Jeffries yazmış:
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Hi there,
I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When
try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ?
Thanks
ismail
Some details about
Amos Jeffries yazmış:
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Amos Jeffries yazmış:
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Amos Jeffries yazmış:
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Hi there,
I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When
try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ?
Thanks
On lör, 2008-11-01 at 14:05 +0200, İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
I'm suspecting it may be gcc-3.3 related. Is there a more recent gcc
version you can upgrade to and try again?
Amos
Opps i am already using gcc version 3.3.5 . ;) . I have just checked it...
Is there any newer GCC version than
Hi there,
I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to
configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ?
Thanks
ismail
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote:
Hi there,
I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to
configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ?
Thanks
ismail
Some details about the errors would be helpful.
Others have managed to get it to work on OpenBSD.
Amos
--
101 - 195 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
