Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-15 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
alp wrote: > > thx again, henrik. > it is becoming clear to me (wish i had your knowledge!). If you spend as much time with Squid as I have you probably will, if not more.. > it is maybe only of philosophical interest: i am wondering if such a request > for test.php would be cached initially. i

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-15 Thread alp
HP/4.1.2 > > X-Powered-By: PHP/4.1.2 > > Content-Type: text/html > > X-Cache: MISS from test.de > > Connection: close > > > > hi-php > > > > (the last line is the content of the file) > > and still it is not in the cache > > > > does this he

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-15 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
g an explanation? > > - Original Message - > From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "alp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:04 PM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-14 Thread alp
lp in finding an explanation? - Original Message - From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "alp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites > Two questions

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-14 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
Two questions: 1. What is your refresh_pattern settings? 2. What is the full headers returend by your server? Just tested this with Squid-2.5 and a reply with only a Date header and some content is cached if your refresh_pattern says it should be. Note: The default refresh_pattern settings doe

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-14 Thread alp
Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "alp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:15 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites > As I said in the previous message: refresh_pattern IS USED for replies > with no

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-14 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
age - > From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "alp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:30 PM > Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites > > > By default it does not. The RF

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-14 Thread alp
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "alp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:30 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites > By default it does not. The RFC does not require either way as there is

Re: [squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-14 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
By default it does not. The RFC does not require either way as there is explicit headers for instructing caches, but common sense recommends not to as such pages are often dynamically generated by programs not aware of caching. The refresh patterns are used, but only if there is no headers denying

[squid-users] squid and php-sites

2003-02-14 Thread alp
hi, i am not sure if squid is required to not cache sites without suitable headers (lastmod, expires,...). does anybody know? it seems as if for such objects the refresh-patterns are NOT used in squid.conf. is this right? thx in advance, alp - Original Message - From: "SSCR Internet Admin