-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/12/2013 9:54 a.m., Guy Helmer wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Don Brearley
> wrote:
>
>> Hello squid-users,
>>
>>
>> I am trying to get wccp2 with squid 3.4 working on Debian Jessie
>> (amd64). Squid itself works fine, until I add
On 24/12/2013 9:46 a.m., Don Brearley wrote:
> Amos,
>
> Your suggestion worked!I hope you guys can get this fix into the
> next release of 3.4.
>
> I applied yours to 3.3.9 and thats where I will stay for the time
> being.
>
> Thanks very much to you, and everyone, who replied.
Thank you
On 20/12/2013 5:30 a.m., Don Brearley wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
>
> I applied your patch to 3.3.9 and recompiled/reinstalled. Same issue
> persists. Here is your
> requested information:
>
>
> (gdb) backtrace
> #0 0x000802cbe23c in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
> #1 0x000802d6263b in abo
Guy,
I recompiled my kernel without the INET6 option and recompiled squid
3.3.9 with --disable-ipv6 and still
get that error..
I'll try building from ports next.. just to see.
Thanks!
- Don
>I can’t find the squid core from the 3.3.9 crashes I saw, but frames #4
and #3 do look familiar.
>
>F
Guy,
I recompiled my kernel without the INET6 option and recompiled squid
3.3.9 with --disable-ipv6 and still
get that error..
I'll try building from ports next.. just to see.
Thanks!
- Don
>I can’t find the squid core from the 3.3.9 crashes I saw, but frames #4
and #3 do look familiar.
>
Hi Amos,
I applied your patch to 3.3.9 and recompiled/reinstalled. Same issue
persists. Here is your
requested information:
root@hib-wccp-1:~ # gdb /usr/sbin/squid
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public Lice
On Dec 18, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Don Brearley wrote:
> [. . .]
> 2013/12/18 21:14:59| storeLateRelease: released 0 objects
> 2013/12/18 21:14:59| Ip::Address::GetSockAddr : Cannot convert non-IPv4 to
> IPv4. from [::]
> Assertion failed: (false), function GetSockAddr, file Address.cc, line 966.
>
>
OK Don,
So I tried to reproduce it on 3.4.1 on a linux system:
default squid.conf adding only couple lines for wccp
$ ./squid -v
Squid Cache: Version 3.4.1
configure options: --enable-ltdl-convenience
$ ./squid -N -d 3
2013/12/19 13:31:07| Set Current Directory to
/usr/local/squid/var/cache/s
For what it's worth, I tried 3.2.1 and the error occured, so there must be
a regression between 3.1.23 and 3.2.1
- Don
>>> "Don Brearley" 12/18/13 9:19 PM >>>
>> Can I provide any more information to help address this?
>>
>
>Can you please start Squid under a debugger and get a full stack
>> Can I provide any more information to help address this?
>>
>
>Can you please start Squid under a debugger and get a full stack trace
>with symbol names?
>
>We need to know where the address converion is being attempted from in
>order to make any progress on a fix.
>
>Amos
Hi Amos,
I hope
On 19/12/2013 11:01 a.m., Don Brearley wrote:
> Hi Eliezer,
>
>
> Thanks for the reply! Yes, I was able to compile the latest 3.1.23 and it
> worked successfully on FreeBSD 9.2 -- however, going to the latest 3.2
> release,
> the problem returned. Definitely a regression there.
>
>
> I'm go
Hi Eliezer,
Thanks for the reply! Yes, I was able to compile the latest 3.1.23 and it
worked successfully on FreeBSD 9.2 -- however, going to the latest 3.2 release,
the problem returned. Definitely a regression there.
I'm going to stay on 3.1.23 for now thanks for the suggestion!
Ca
On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Don Brearley wrote:
>>> What version of squid are you running, and which OS is it on? Thanks!
>>
>> squid 3.3.9 on FreeBSD 9.2.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Guy
>
> Hi Guy,
>
>
> I just attempted 3.3.9 on FreeBSD 9.2/amd64 and I get the exact same error.
> What are you
Hey Don,
For now I have not tested 3.2+ with wccp yet since I do not have all the
resources I had In the past for it now.
I wrote this:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/UbuntuTproxy4Wccp2
And If it works on 3.1 I want to make sure it's a regression between 3.1
to 3.2 3.3.
Can you
>> What version of squid are you running, and which OS is it on? Thanks!
>
>squid 3.3.9 on FreeBSD 9.2.
>
>Regards,
>Guy
Hi Guy,
I just attempted 3.3.9 on FreeBSD 9.2/amd64 and I get the exact same error.
What are you doing different than I?
Compiled from source with: --prefix=/usr
>
Guy Helmer 12/16/13 2:53 PM >>>
>
>On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Don Brearley wrote:
>>
>> Hello squid-users,
>>
>>
>> I am trying to get wccp2 with squid 3.4 working on Debian Jessie (amd64).
>> Squid itself works fine, until I
>> add "wccp2_router" into the mix, where then squid cr
On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Don Brearley wrote:
> Hello squid-users,
>
>
> I am trying to get wccp2 with squid 3.4 working on Debian Jessie (amd64).
> Squid itself works fine, until I
> add "wccp2_router" into the mix, where then squid crashes.
>
>
> When I define:
>
>
> wccp2_router
On 11/04/2013 10:48 p.m., Youssef Ghorbal wrote:
On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 11/04/2013 12:23 a.m., Youssef Ghorbal wrote:
I was aware of that page.
As you said, it's often RPS so it's not relevant for me.
It is more relevant than you seem to think. Squid processing
On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 12:23 a.m., Youssef Ghorbal wrote:
>> I was aware of that page.
>> As you said, it's often RPS so it's not relevant for me.
>
> It is more relevant than you seem to think. Squid processing overheads are
> tied tightly to the req
On 11/04/2013 12:23 a.m., Youssef Ghorbal wrote:
I was aware of that page.
As you said, it's often RPS so it's not relevant for me.
It is more relevant than you seem to think. Squid processing overheads
are tied tightly to the request parsing and ACL testing processes. These
are relatively fi
I was aware of that page.
As you said, it's often RPS so it's not relevant for me.
Youssef
On Apr 10, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Kinkie wrote:
> You probably want to check
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks
>
> Unfortunately the benchmarks reported are often exp
You probably want to check http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/Benchmarks
Unfortunately the benchmarks reported are often expressed as RPS and
not bandwidth.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Youssef Ghorbal wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Kinkie wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at
On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Kinkie wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Youssef Ghorbal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>Is there any recent figures about max throughput to be expected from
>> a squid 3.x install (on recent hardware) in the scenario of a single stream
>> downloading a lar
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Youssef Ghorbal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any recent figures about max throughput to be expected from
> a squid 3.x install (on recent hardware) in the scenario of a single stream
> downloading a large file (> 1GB) (read not cacheable)
> I'm aw
In build-dep dependiencies maintainers did not included libssl-dev and
devscripts, so the building with ssl support is imposible without
them.
Fortunatelly not only me has such problem so I have found the answer:
http://www.banym.de/linux/build-squid-with-enable-ssl-on-debian
Regards.
Bartosz.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:56:48 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Max Feil:
>> Already did use Wireshark. Here is some more info:
>>
>> If you look through the traces you'll notice that at some point Squid
>> sends a TCP [FIN, ACK] right in the middle of a connection for
seemingly
>> no reason. (Att
i will try now
On 24/01/2011 22:01, Henrik Nordström wrote:
squid -k debug
sön 2011-01-23 klockan 23:35 -0500 skrev Max Feil:
> If you look through the traces you'll notice that at some point Squid
> sends a TCP [FIN, ACK] right in the middle of a connection for
> seemingly no reason.
>
> From the browser side it seems to be given no notification that the
> connection
* Max Feil :
> Already did use Wireshark. Here is some more info:
>
> If you look through the traces you'll notice that at some point Squid sends a
> TCP [FIN, ACK] right in the middle of a connection for seemingly no reason.
> (Attempting to close the connection) The server ignores this and sen
:16 PM
> To: Max Feil
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid 3.x very slow loading on ireport.cnn.com
>
> tor 2011-01-20 klockan 02:50 -0500 skrev Max Feil:
>> Thanks. I am looking at the squid access.log and the delay is caused by
>> a GET whi
oad
fast. However this is probably a bad idea in general...
>
> Max
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Henrik Nordström [mailto:hen...@henriknordstrom.net]
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 7:16 PM
> To: Max Feil
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: RE: [squid-
a bad idea in general...
Max
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordström [mailto:hen...@henriknordstrom.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 7:16 PM
To: Max Feil
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid 3.x very slow loading on ireport.cnn.com
tor 2011-01-20 klockan 02:50 -
tor 2011-01-20 klockan 02:50 -0500 skrev Max Feil:
> Thanks. I am looking at the squid access.log and the delay is caused by
> a GET which for some reason does not result in a response from the
> server. Either there is no response or Squid is missing the response.
> After a 120 second time-out the
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 9:18 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.x very slow loading on
ireport.cnn.com
On 20/01/11 13:31, Max Feil wrote:
> I'm wondering if anybody knows what might be causing this. I've
> confirmed this problem in l
On 20/01/11 13:31, Max Feil wrote:
I'm wondering if anybody knows what might be causing this. I've
confirmed this problem in linux builds of Squid 3.0, 3.1.1, 3.1.10 and
3.2.0.4.
Using firefox (or probably any browser - it also happens in a webkit
based browser under development) clear the brows
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 07:07 -0500, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote:
> Henrik,
> what is the advantage rewrite squid in C++?
Less manual work repeating the same C calls everywhere - C++ lets us
hook into the compilers actions for memory management, implement
programmer transparent memory management
* Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >Aha. Should I try it?
>
> Try you can,
Yes, master Yoda :)
> but it is far from production quality at the moment.
Uh, too risky then.
--
_
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
__
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote:
what is the advantage rewrite squid in C++?
It forces a cleaner separation into modules with private data and public
interfaces.
Squid was becoming increasingly OO styled anyway.
Regards
Henrik
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I guess it's I/O bound anyway, so adding CPU won't help.
It depends, but it is certainly the case that there is a lot which can
done to make Squid scale considerably better on a single CPU, but there is
always limits.
Squid-3.x is supposed to be featu
Henrik,
what is the advantage rewrite squid in C++?
Regards.
Fernando.
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:55 AM
To: Ralf Hildebrandt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.x
On Tue, 21 Sep
* Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dream.
Ah, OK.
I guess it's I/O bound anyway, so adding CPU won't help.
> Squid-3.x is supposed to be feature wise close to Squid-2.5 but
> rewritten to C++, and with a few new features thrown in.
Aha. Should I try it?
--
_
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I imagine that I read someplace that squid-3.x is supposed to make use
of multiple processors. True or dream?
Dream.
Squid-3.x is supposed to be feature wise close to Squid-2.5 but rewritten
to C++, and with a few new features thrown in.
Regards
Henrik
42 matches
Mail list logo
