Re: [SM-USERS] setuid on in squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2004-01-08 Thread sziisoft
y, January 08, 2004 3:21 AM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] setuid on in squirrelmail 1.4.2-1 > > > >> Message: 1 > >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:58:04 -0500 > >> Subject: [SM-USERS] Why is

Re: [SM-USERS] setuid on in squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2004-01-08 Thread Konstantin Riabitsev
Le jeu 08/01/2004 Ã 01:42, Douglas Campbell a Ãcrit : > I also noticed this a few days ago. I am using squirrelmail 1.4.2-1, downloaded > from squirrelmail.org site; I am > running it under RedHat 8.0 with all patches applied. The previous version of > squirrelmail was deleted prior to > instal

Re: [SM-USERS] setuid on in squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2004-01-08 Thread p dont think
> >> Message: 1 >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:58:04 -0500 >> Subject: [SM-USERS] Why is the group SUID bit set on 1.4.2? >> >> This would appear to be a security risk. I don't see any reason for it >> and >> 1.4.1 didn't have this set. >> >> Is

[SM-USERS] setuid on in squirrelmail 1.4.2-1

2004-01-07 Thread Douglas Campbell
Message: 1 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:58:04 -0500 Subject: [SM-USERS] Why is the group SUID bit set on 1.4.2? This would appear to be a security risk. I don't see any reason for it and 1.4.1 didn't have this set. Is this required, or was someone b