Re: [sqwebmail] browser incompatibility

2003-08-30 Thread Sean Smith
Ok, Sorry, Stupid Newbie Mistake. I set Apache's document root to the webmail folder and for some reason Netscape handled it but IE was adding a second / to the image paths. So, of course it couldn't find the images. I reset the document root to docs and moved my index.html to docs and now

Re: [sqwebmail] browser incompatibility

2003-08-30 Thread Brian Candler
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 09:43:08AM -0500, Sean Smith wrote: >Apparently the tags are getting replaced when I use Netscape, but > not when I use IE. That's not true - they *are* getting replaced. Sqwebmail doesn't know or care what browser you have. Try doing "view document source" in IE and

Re: [sqwebmail] Qmail-ldap and sqwebmail - Password change issue

2003-08-30 Thread Biswajit Banerjee
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Brian Candler wrote: Dear Brain, Thanks a ton , it did worked out . AUTHBIND variable help and now the issue is resolved . Thanks again Regards Biswajit Banerjee > On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 04:36:44PM +0530, Biswajit Banerjee wrote: > > userPassword:: e2NyeXB0fUJtdWlYdkJ

Re: [sqwebmail] browser incompatibility

2003-08-30 Thread Sean Smith
James, I guess I should have said what version in the first e-mail. Sorry, I wasn't thinking. It's 3.5.3. Apparently the tags are getting replaced when I use Netscape, but not when I use IE. I have an index.html with a one second meta refresh pointing to the cgi file. Is that causing any

[sqwebmail] compiling error

2003-08-30 Thread Roberto Marzialetti
hi all "up & running": vpopmail, qmail, qmailadmin i'm trying to compile sqwebmail on my slackware 9 after ./configure, no problem; (this is my configure options -- ./configure --with-authvchkpw --without-authpwd --without-authshadow --without-authpam --without-authuserdb --without-authldap --wi

Re: [sqwebmail] Qmail-ldap and sqwebmail - Password change issue

2003-08-30 Thread Brian Candler
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 04:36:44PM +0530, Biswajit Banerjee wrote: > userPassword:: e2NyeXB0fUJtdWlYdkJIRWZnYXc= That is a base64 representation of "{crypt}BmuiXvBHEfgaw" - you can determine this using one of various commands, e.g. $ perl -e 'use MIME::Base64; print decode_base64("e2NyeXB0fUJtdWl

[sqwebmail] Qmail-ldap and sqwebmail - Password change issue

2003-08-30 Thread Biswajit Banerjee
Dear All , I have successfully compiled qmail with ldap patch and useing cleartextpassword. Everything is working fine except when i change password of any user thro' sqwebmail's interface , the user can get thro' only sqwebmail and not by any pop3 client . Where as i have created users and there

Re: [sqwebmail] Help with --enable-bannerprog

2003-08-30 Thread Brian Candler
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:27:12AM -0700, rkl wrote: > Can someone give me a literal value example for this option with a top and > bottom banner? > > here's the content of the INSTALL for this option: > > --enable-bannerprog=program - full path to a banner program. You want a literal e

[sqwebmail] attachment size limit

2003-08-30 Thread rkl
What is wrong here? Does apache 2.0.4 have anything to do with it? After recompiling what I think should beable to handle up to 15M less 25% attachment size. Also, 15M is the max mesg size. I can attach size a little less than 1.5M but I can send atleast 5 or 6 of those little 1.5M which is

[sqwebmail] Help with --enable-bannerprog

2003-08-30 Thread rkl
Can someone give me a literal value example for this option with a top and bottom banner? here's the content of the INSTALL for this option: --enable-bannerprog=program - full path to a banner program. sqwebmail replaces the character sequence [#B#] in HTML template files wi

Re: [sqwebmail] mailing list delivery failure

2003-08-30 Thread James A Baker
On Saturday, Aug 30, 2003, at 01:25 US/Central, rkl wrote: is anyone else getting these: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -rkl Yeah, I've gotten 1 of each for every one of the 4 messages I've sent tonight. (Um... 5 messages now, I guess... guess I can expect another 2 pieces of junk. *sigh*)

[sqwebmail] mailing list delivery failure

2003-08-30 Thread rkl
is anyone else getting these: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -rkl

[sqwebmail] Re: What affect hard/soft timeout limit?

2003-08-30 Thread rkl
i may have been mistaken by my questions. i understand the difference hard/soft timeout. but i was questioning more of its use for email application. thus, i wonder how others are using the hardtimeout. any ideas? i agree make the hardtimeout value way out leaving only the softtimeout to han

Re: [sqwebmail] browser incompatibility

2003-08-30 Thread James A Baker
On Saturday, Aug 30, 2003, at 01:02 US/Central, Sean Smith wrote: OK, I read through some of the archives and FAQs and figured out where the templates were. On my Linux 7.3 distro they were installed in /usr/local/share/sqwebmail/html. Upon arriving in that directory and looking through

Re: [sqwebmail] browser incompatibility

2003-08-30 Thread Sean Smith
OK, I read through some of the archives and FAQs and figured out where the templates were. On my Linux 7.3 distro they were installed in /usr/local/share/sqwebmail/html. Upon arriving in that directory and looking through the login.html page I noticed that all of the image tags, instead

Re: [sqwebmail] Re: What affect hard/soft timeout limit?

2003-08-30 Thread James A Baker
On Saturday, Aug 30, 2003, at 00:45 US/Central, rkl wrote: what it is doing: it is timing out on the hardtimeout even if i'm active into the last minute. what i expect: the hardtimeout expiration to be extended from my last activity. it seems odd that i'm kicked out at a fix interval even though

[sqwebmail] Re: What affect hard/soft timeout limit?

2003-08-30 Thread rkl
what it is doing: it is timing out on the hardtimeout even if i'm active into the last minute. what i expect: the hardtimeout expiration to be extended from my last activity. it seems odd that i'm kicked out at a fix interval even though i might be actively using the mail. -do you agree?

Re: [sqwebmail] What affect hard/soft timeout limit?

2003-08-30 Thread James A Baker
On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 22:48 US/Central, rkl wrote: Can anyone tell me if the apache or any other factors are invlove in the hard/soft timeout of sqwebmail? Also, would a network interruption cause it to timeout? My problem is that it doesn't seem to timeout as I expected. I'm using the conf

Re: [sqwebmail] browser incompatibility

2003-08-30 Thread James A Baker
On Friday, Aug 29, 2003, at 18:24 US/Central, Sean Smith wrote: [...] First, I would like to add one of my logos to sqwebmail. To every page? Or just one to replace the SqWebMail logo on the login page(s)? Second, For some reason sqwebmail works fine with Netscape but does not show some of the

[sqwebmail] What affect hard/soft timeout limit?

2003-08-30 Thread rkl
Can anyone tell me if the apache or any other factors are invlove in the hard/soft timeout of sqwebmail? Also, would a network interruption cause it to timeout? My problem is that it doesn't seem to timeout as I expected. I'm using the configure options: --enable-hardtimeout=14400 (4 hrs)

Re: [sqwebmail] browser incompatibility

2003-08-30 Thread Jim Kubicek
Try these out.. the F.A.Q. is very new, but hopefully it will grow. Mailing List Archive http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/index.html SqWebMail F.A.Q. http://faq.mydot.net Jim - Original Message - From: "Sean Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday,