Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sca: implement db_mode only (#781)

2017-03-30 Thread Victor Seva
2017-02-24 11:03 GMT+01:00 Victor Seva : > @miconda I'm thinking if sca can be > redesigned and integrate the subscription part of it as a module like > presence_sca using presence infrastructure. > > The thing is that presence has support

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sca: implement db_mode only (#781)

2017-02-24 Thread Victor Seva
@miconda I'm thinking if ``sca`` can be redesigned and integrate the subscription part of it as a module like ``presence_sca`` using ``presence`` infrastructure. The thing is that ``presence`` has support for process only the body not for the headers and ``sca`` is adding ``Call-Info`` header

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sca: implement db_mode only (#781)

2016-10-28 Thread Kevin Scott Adams
I assume you mean more then one kamailio server in a load-balancing type environment? If so, that was on my radar for future enhancements but I am glad someone is finally looking at this module and making some improvements. Thank you so much This module is one that I use at many customers

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sca: implement db_mode only (#781)

2016-10-28 Thread Victor Seva
Any thoughts @TheGrandWazoo ? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-256940663___ sr-dev mailing list

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sca: implement db_mode only (#781)

2016-09-14 Thread Victor Seva
Sipwise hat ON: We have more than one server and we need to keep things in db in order to share sca subscription/appearance between servers -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: