Thank you, everyone, for your responses.
Benoît, thank you for providing the sample code. My concern is that the
code may become complex as it needs to be both transaction and dialog
aware. For example, it needs to be transaction-aware when sending a 100 or
200 response back and conversion from
> the phonenum module is pretty decent for helping with NANP numbers and
deciphering if one is let’s say US vs Canada vs Jamaica, etc.
Absolutely. And if his use case is to actually get the political country,
it's a great choice. With that said, I'm guessing that in his case the
vendor wants
Ah ok, think I misunderstood what you were asking here.
You can use the PV $rs in a condition for the 607 (or anything >400 etc) to
hit rtpengine_manage() block, just put it in your failure route.
The block can be used in any route:
RTPEngine will time out a call if it ceases to receive RTP from both endpoints.
You can lower this timeout to something much more stringent, and that will help
shorten the life cycle of ports.
> On May 31, 2024, at 9:49 AM, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users
> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering how to handle
Ben Kaufman via sr-users writes:
>> US numbers are fixed lenght 11 digits?
>
> The USA is in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP). This includes USA,
> Canada, much of the
> Caribbean (Cuba, Jamaica, Barbados for example), some US territories in the
> Pacific (Guam,
> American
I'm wondering how to handle situations where downstream send invalid
messages. In this case, Kamailio is not able to send DELETE commands
to rtpengine due to parsing errors, as a result rtpengine is consuming all
available ports and causing instability in our VoIP infrastructure. Do you
have any
Hi,
Nothing is jumping out to me here in the Invite, if this is working for
other destinations but not this one then the SIP response might truly be
the answer here: 607 - Unwanted - "
The user agent(UA) of the called party, based on input from the called party or
some UA-internal logic, uses
The Response Reason Phrase is missing in status line, see RFC 3261 section
7.2.
Hope this helps.
--
Muhammad Shahzad Shafi
Tel: +49 176 99 83 10 85
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 2:57 PM Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users <
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> Hello Kamailio Community,
>
> I'm
> On May 31, 2024, at 9:20 AM, Ben Kaufman via sr-users
> wrote:
>
> Answered in order of easiest answer to most complex:
>
>> Does it start with a 0?
> No. I've never encountered any US number requiring a prefix of "0" nor a US
> number being
> written that way.
>
>
>> US numbers are
Yes, it's in response to an INVITE. Here is the complete flow
U 10.x.x.xx:5060 -> 21x.xx.x.x:5060 #132
INVITE sip:44x...@21x.xx.x.x;transport=udp SIP/2.0.
Record-Route:
.
Record-Route:
.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
134.xxx.xxx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK344e.71c27ecd75bd8bf9c9a971e5ec472e16.0;i=2.
Via:
Answered in order of easiest answer to most complex:
> Does it start with a 0?
No. I've never encountered any US number requiring a prefix of "0" nor a US
number being
written that way.
> US numbers are fixed lenght 11 digits?
The USA is in the North American Numbering Plan (NANP).
A few points, and reasons why the issue is both more simple and more complex
than indicated:
1. The definition of E.164 isn’t clear here. My assumption is that you mean
a digit string that starts with a plus character. There is no requirement in
the E.164 specification that a leading
Hi Mustafa,
Ideally we would need the Invite to better understand this, the 607 is in
response to the Invite. Whether this is something in the Invite itself or
something at the called end we don't know.
Thanks,
John.
On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 13:57, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users <
> On May 31, 2024, at 8:35 AM, Alex Balashov via sr-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 31, 2024, at 8:09 AM, Benoît Panizzon via sr-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> This would also solve another problem. We have some CPE with limited
>> memory which struggle with a long record-route list.
>
> Indeed, and
> On May 31, 2024, at 8:39 AM, Ghulam Mustafa via sr-users
> wrote:
>
> SIP/2.0 607.
Well, that seems clear enough. ;-)
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
Evariste Systems LLC
Web: https://evaristesys.com
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
__
Hi Mustafa
> SIP/2.0 607.
I didn't check the RFC. But doesnt a reply need to be in the format
SIP/2.0 XXX AA
Is the text missing after the numerical error code?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter
Hello Kamailio Community,
I'm encountering a parsing error in Kamailio when receiving a SIP 607
"Unwanted" response. The relevant log entries are:
May 31 12:32:09 k-proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[320898]: ERROR:
[core/receive.c:378]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed
> On May 31, 2024, at 8:09 AM, Benoît Panizzon via sr-users
> wrote:
>
> This would also solve another problem. We have some CPE with limited
> memory which struggle with a long record-route list.
Indeed, and this is why I recommended it. It would solve a larger class of
problems, above and
Hi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>data="[sip_h_X-PGPX=${uuid}]sofia/internal/$1@${sendto}"/> application="hangup"/>
>
> I was not aware it was that simple. Thank you for the education!
Indeed. I was considering asterisk as I tend to use what I know.
But with Asterisk I would have to add
Fred,
This is beautiful:
I was not aware it was that simple. Thank you for the education!
-- Alex
> On May 30, 2024, at 6:24 PM, Fred Posner via sr-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 30, 2024, at 5:49 PM, Alex Balashov via sr-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Benoit,
>>
>>> Snip
Hello David,
please share the usual details, e.g.:
* Kamailio version
* Operating system version
* OpenSSL version
Furthermore please try to enable core dumping and have a look to the backtrace.
Cheers,
Henning Westerholt
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Hi Kumar,
Not sure whether this is of any help but you can check out
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.9.x/modules/phonenum.html module.
BR,
Supreeth
On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 10:27, Benoît Panizzon via sr-users <
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote:
> Hi Kumar
>
> > Before writing the code, I
Hi Kumar
> Before writing the code, I want to know if there is already a
> solution to this problem in one of the modules, so that I won't
> reinvent the wheel.
US numbers are fixed lenght 11 digits? What is the usual representation
of a 'local' US number? Does it start with a 0?
I do this (to
23 matches
Mail list logo
