What if you do:
remove_hf(“Record-Route”);
?
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Apr 27, 2019, at 7:00 PM, Sergiu Pojoga wrote:
>
> Hi ppl,
>
> After a branch route fails, I need to re-evaluate the next destination and
> adjust RR parameters, if need be,
any fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation
about what it really is. :-)
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.
d Dean
> wrote:
>
>
> Agreed. Unfortunately Janus doesn't accept base64 at this time.
>
> I'll ask Lorenzo whether he can add base64 support, but in the interim I need
> to find a way in Kamailio of parsing $avp(sdp) as shell escaped plain text
> with the control character
Hi,
Note the difference between set_body() vs. set_reply_body(), the latter
of which being my recommendation.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com
David,
As usual, you are working too hard, too fast, and need to slow down,
breathe, relax, practice some "mindfulness techniques", and take a
meditative stroll through the documentation. :-)
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.2.x/modules/textops.html#textops.f.set_reply_body
-- Al
body to be created but doesn't allow a
> status code to be set (as far as I know?)
>
> So frustrating because I've been able to script everything else I need within
> Kamailio. The missing piece is being able to create this response then
> everything works.
>
> Dave.
>
ote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for the tip re: rtpengine routing, that's really useful.
>
> The flow I'm trying to create is like this:
>
> [ Test Client ] --> INVITE --> [ Kamailio ]
> ^ |
>
PLY");
if(!t_relay())
sl_reply_error();
exit;
}
...
}
onreply_route[REPLY] {
if(is_method("INVITE") && sdp_content())
rtpengine_answer("...");
}
---
-- Alex
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 07:41:22PM +, David Dean wrote:
> Hi all,
>
If your SIP phone is doing it, try turn off STUN/TURN.
If it’s a SIP ALG (application layer gateway) on an intermediate NAT router,
try turning that off.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Apr 8, 2019, at 8:10 AM, vinod mn wrote:
>
> Hi ,
> I have a cloud
Hi,
To-tags are only significant at the dialog layer. Replies are matched to
a transaction by Via `branch` parameter and CSeq. See RFC 3261 § 17.1.3
for details.
Consequently, the 503 response should be matched to the initial INVITE
transaction on that basis alone.
-- Alex
On Sun, Apr 07, 2019
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 06:23:16PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
>route {
> ...
>
> # Initial INVITE handling:
>
> if(is_method("INVITE")) {
> # Set fr_inv_timer initially to 5 seconds, so that
># if we do not receive an
dicate progress/alerting.
if(is_method("INVITE") && t_check_status("180|183"))
t_reset_fr();
}
Hope that helps!
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http
e routers cannot deal with this intelligently, especially in concert
with NAT.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
Kama
The customary inter-Kamailio solution is jumbo frames (if you control network
end-to-end) or TCP.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Apr 1, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Igor Olhovskiy wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Was looking on some way to compress SIP signalling between
For immediate release:
ATLANTA, GA (1 April 2019)--Following its long tradition of forward-thinking
innovation in open-source Real-Time Communications (RTC), the leadership of the
Kamailio SIP server project (formerly known as OpenSER) has launched the
Kamailio Managed Cloud (KMC).
Alex Balashov
Use -M to add more “package memory” (private memory per individual Kamailio
process). I forget what the default is, but try 8 or 12 MB (-M 8 or -M 12) for
likely happiness.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 3:34 PM, David Villasmil
> wrote:
;> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>> On 27.03.19 00:22, Joel Serrano wrote:
>>> Wonderful!!!
>>>
>>> This is perfect:
>>> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/features:new-in-3.0.x#names_for_route_blocks_and_flags
>>>
>>
Hi Joel,
Yes, this is a gap in the core cookbook documentation.
I learned about named flags back in the day:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/features:new-in-3.0.x
-- Alex
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:04:29PM -0700, Joel Serrano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw in the Kazoo de
It is not.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 8:44 AM, Duarte Rocha wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> On an INVITE the user part in the Contact header mandatory? Can't seem to
> find info on this.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Duarte Rocha
>
of my own understanding of
Kamailio/OpenSER; it was 11 years ago. I don't know if the question is
very pertinent today as formulated there.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswit
omponentry, such
as:
"Should I do HA failover with VRRP or Heartbeat?"
"Is Kamailio + PostgreSQL a stable combination for a high-volume
registrar?"
"Are there pitfalls to DMQ dialog replication?"
"What is the best way to build a load balancer with failover and ga
ld purport
to rank them somehow, can be meaningfully separated from the equally
vital need to create some kind of taxonomy of modules or, more
generally, adequate categories of thought within which such
conversations should take place. Kamailio documentation lacks a clear
and distinct "metap
any config
> or setting that would do this automatically?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Duarte Rocha
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex
short of manipulating the Contact directly.
That would leave you no better off than just doing the
set_contact_alias() + handle_ruri_alias() thing, so I would just do
that.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
er I need to do
> this outside of DMQ. I have a host I need to send specific REGISTERs to so I
> can't include that host in the DMQ group, as it would receive all usr_loc
> records.
>
> -dan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex
> Balashov
(contact_recv)")
modparam("registrar", "received_param", "received")
modparam("registrar", "path_check_local", 1)
And it seems to "just work".
-- Alex
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:15:21PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:15:21PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> There's a 50% chance I could be mistaken, but I vaguely remember that
> replication of 'received' was an issue in some earlier version of
> Kamailio than that.
And by "that" I mean 5.1.1.
--
Alex Balashov | P
that.
-- Alex
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 05:13:31PM +, Daniel W. Graham wrote:
> When forwarding / replicating a REGISTER, is it possible (without using DMQ)
> for the receiving host to save the contact with the original received
> parameter?
>
> REGISTER > server 1 (received set)
ice Unavailable");
exit;
}
}
-- Alex
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:23:11AM -0600, JR Richardson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My mind is not right on this one, need a pointer. Here is the simple scenario:
> Carrier> The end device is a static IP, the proxy dips databas
Does Kamailio have listeners (listen= on both interfaces)? What is the value of
the ‘mhomed’ setting?
These nuances surely differ between the two hosts.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 4:14 PM, Roman Dissauer wrote:
>
> I’m experiencing
amount to a few ms at least.
It doesn't sound like that's where the issue lies...
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:43:02PM -0500, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> You can do hundreds of CPS with only two workers and the CPU will be
> at 3% utilization on very old hardware.
> There's something else in your config creating issues.
+1
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
at said, I am not aware of any aspect by which Kamailio intrinsically
sends a 503 if it is overwhelmed with requests. It just drops
them/doesn't process.
-- Alex
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:35:46PM +, Duarte Rocha wrote:
> Ok, i reduced the number of processes and tried a few different val
gt;
> > Just make sure all the connections to the DB are using the WAL mode.
> >
> > The downside is that the writers can be delayed sometimes, similar to
> > Postgres read only replica
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:57 AM Duarte Rocha
> > wrote:
> >
&g
Why do you have 100 processes for Kamailio? Dial that down!
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/tuning-kamailio-for-high-throughput-and-performance/
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Duarte Rocha wrote:
>
> Greet
What sort of insufficient read performance are you seeing from SQLite on modern
storage which would lead you to this unnecessary ideation? Read performance on
SQLite is insanely fast...
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 12:23 PM, Duarte Rocha
://skalatan.de/de/assessment
> >
> > ___
> > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-user
Hi,
First, a proxy should only remove the topmost Route headers whose URI domains
correspond to addresses the proxy perceives to be its own, not another
element’s. Are you sure that is not a possibility in your case?
Second, the loose_route() should set the network and transport-layer next-hop
No, it’s not “actually” dead in that sense.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Feb 21, 2019, at 10:01 PM, David Cunningham
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Is it actually dead, as in unsupported by the RFC or Kamailio? If so would
> that expla
User-Agent: ewb2bua/15.3.0
> Content-Length: 0
>
> --
> David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
> http://voisonics.com/
> USA: +1 213 221 1092
> New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
&
I think the question about the motive for altering the Contact is prerequisite
to all this. It is not necessarily apt to presume that topology hiding is the
goal.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Feb 12, 2019, at 2:43 PM, Nicolas Breuer
> wrote:
>
> You
s/uac.html
"Business logic to figure out what action to take with a SIP request"
probably describes most useful applications of Kamailio. It wouldn't
have much viability as infrastructure if it did not have that
capability.
-- Alex
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 05:00:20PM +0100, Filippos Va
ilio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in
> Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
factors.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Feb 5, 2019, at 12:55 PM, Duarte Rocha wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer Alex.
>
> Wheb you say you have dealt with this, do you mean this exact scenario with
> re-invites and ACK or just with gen
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250
I don't see any issues with it, no...
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 01:06:40PM +1300, David Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> We already had this line in our kamailio.cfg:
> modparam( "nathelper|registrar", "received_avp", "$avp(RECEIVED)" )
>
use the AVP:
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.2.x/modules/registrar.html#registrar.p.received_avp
If you set it to empty for a registration from a certain type of device,
the parameter will not be populated and thus not reflected back to the
registering UA.
-- Alex
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03
ctive active where things like floating IP's and keepalived are not
> really an option.
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
module's state machine.
-- Alex
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:25:45PM +0100, Cyrille Demaret wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm running Kamailio 5.1.4 and I have some problem with some random dialogs
> sometimes staying in early state and never ends until I restart Kamailio.
>
>
>
Hi Paolo,
Have a look at this article (shameless plug - I am the author):
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/sip-udp-fragmentation-and-kamailio-the-sip-header-diet/
-- Alex
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:20:59PM +0100, * Paolo Visintin - evosip.cloud wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> thanks for your sugg
lexibility that comes with
it, by virtue of the lower-level interface - almost always exists in
Kamailio as well. This is certainly one of those cases. :-) I learned
something in that thread.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 04:38:31PM -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019
trar? For my application this is required, and I haven’t been
> able to find any information on this.
Please see this thread:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/2018-June/007716.html
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-f
It seems to me this problem would be more easily solved by using
Record-Route as intended, and finding a way to float the IP address of
the proxy, or injecting a (reliably resolvable!) DNS alias into RR.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:14:28PM +0100, * Paolo Visintin - evosip.cloud wrote:
> Hi A
Hi,
Perhaps it is worthwhile to ask the question: why do you want to
manipulate $du for these internally generated BYEs? What is the root
problem you are trying to solve?
-- Alex
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:27:19PM +0100, * Paolo Visintin - evosip.cloud wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm
h is a problem rtpengine_manage() solves beautifully. At the same
time, I absolutely need the slight reinvite delay that can be
accomplished via async processing; a UA on this side has a nasty habit
of sending a reinvite almost simultaneously to the 2xx answer for the
INVITE transaction, leading
request_route {
$avp(sess_mylog_id) = 0;
$var(mylog_data) = 'L_INFO|route[MAIN] INIT SIP REQUEST [ sip_requestId:' +
$mi + ' ]';
route(MYLOG);
.
}
route[MYLOG] {
$avp(sess_mylog_id) = $avp(sess_mylog_id) + 1;
$shv(mylog_id) = $shv(mylog_id) + 1;
$var(mylog_level) =
As STUN is a client-side construct, I am not aware of any functionality
Kamailio might have to make *use* of a STUN server for its own representations
about its reachability.
But I could be wrong.
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
of professional opinion, and I do not speak
for the project nor the intentions of the core developers.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com
attached a sample PCAP for if anyone has any suggestions.
>
> Thanks.
> Dan
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Bal
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:50:55PM -0800, Joel Serrano wrote:
> If it was me, I would handle everything with ansible, but that is just
> my tool of preference.
I'll add a vote for SaltStack, my preferred tool of choice.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-51
mutex") locking required for multiple processes to share connections
would become a drag on performance. This way, every child process can
access the database in its own "lane" without having to fight with any
other process over a shared handle.
-- Alex
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:1
Hi,
The documentation here explains fairly well how to set up the recording
component of RTPEngine. Recording is then enabled via a command sent in
the rtpengine_offer()/manage() functions.
https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine
-- Alex
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:19:02AM -0800, b...@telopar.net
Ah, wait. I missed the fact that this only fails to work with multiple PIDs.
You don't have your branch failover mode overridden, do you?
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Balashov
To: "David Escartín" , "Kamaili
: $T_rpl($rb)
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.1.x/pseudovariables#t_rpl_pv
-- Alex
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:22:14PM +0100, David Escartín wrote:
> Hello all
> we are seeing what we think is quite strange behaviour
>
> We have expecienced this on 5.0 and 5.1 version.
>
>
.
-- Alex
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:04:44AM -0200, João Sávio wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was reading the documentation of Kamailio, And, although there are some
> authentication modules, I couldn't find a way to implement a custom
> authentication for SIP Register. Something that allows
In this sense, your initial post is profoundly misleading. You need to provide
complete and accurate details from the context in which any issue occurs.
And as Daniel said, the precise config contact on which this stored procedure
is called is key.
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity
x/modules/ipops.html#ipops.f.is_ipv6
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
/enQtNDY1NDc5MzMwNDIzLWJlNTFhYmYwOWE4ODcyZmM3OWYyMjEwYmRjMDg3YjU0NTU5YjNkZDdlNTM4NTFmYzYyMmE1YzQxNzNmZDAxNjA
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Balashov
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Sent: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 2:43 PM
Subjec
e initiative!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:38 AM David Villasmil <
> david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > That's a great idea, though i doubt it'll get much traction... be right in!
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018, 16:29 Alex Balashov
> > wrote:
&
itch to it.
- A lot of people positioned within the current wave of thinking about
IT and technology, and thus a big part of our candidate user base,
have never used IRC.
Anyway, for those interested, I propose that you join Emmanuel and I.
Let's see how it works out?
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov |
g
comparisons. '==' and '!=' attempt to make appropriate type inferences
based on the types of the operands, and as one can see, not necessarily
consistently or correctly.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristes
lper.p.sipping_bflag
In other words, if this branch flag is set, this Contact will be marked
by the nathelper module for periodic pinging via OPTIONS or INFO[1]. The
purpose of this periodic server-side pinging is to keep NAT pinholes
alive.
-- Alex
[1]
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/mo
Just out of curiosity, will this yield the same result?
if($var(teste) eq 'Test')
?
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: Duarte Rocha
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 8:55 AM
Subject: [SR-Users] Odd behavior
Agree. There is a general need for transaction-associated replies and
dialog-associated in-dialog requests (and their replies) to all go to the same
node. There are Via and Record-Route attributes you can set to make this
happen, assuming you're opposed to the load balancer keeping state based
you start with FIRST? Think about it critically ...
-- Alex
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:51:12AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> I think you've crawled down that rabbit hole about two millennia
> prematurely. There is a much simpler explanation for why you're getting
> a duplicated SDP stanza
;
> Thank you,
> -Steve
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.e
Protocol Version (v) 0
> data when using rtpengine
>
> No calls to fix_nated_sdp().
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex
> Balashov
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:58 PM
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [S
Short answer: no, there is no replication of transaction state.
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: Phillman25 Kyriacou
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 4:56 AM
Subject: [SR-Users] DMQ and DIALOG
Hi List!
I currently
Also, is there any possibility that you are calling fix_nated_sdp() and
rtpengine_offer/manage() successively?
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Steve"
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol Version (v) 0 data
when using rtpengine
Entire section.
-Original Message-
From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Tuesday, Octo
Is the entire SDP body doubled, or just the v=0 line?
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: "Wilkins, Steve"
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 9:07 PM
Subject: [SR-Users] Double Session Description Protocol
an take part in an entirely
stateless way.
7. The 'htable' module, as suggested by others, is the best way to
implement any sort of temporary IP banning. Otherwise, log the offending
IP via xlog() and have fail2ban deal with it.
-- Alex
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:30:03PM +0300, Ellad Yatsko w
only and not for call state.
Cheers,
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr
I did not say that my article represents a complete answer to every part
of every one of your questions, at every level of abstraction and
specificity. Just that it might be helpful. :-)
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0300, Ellad Yatsko wrote:
> Dear Alex,
>
> your article is just
I hate to plug my own articles, but in this case it might help:
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/kamailio-as-an-sbc-five-years-on/
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: Ellad Yatsko
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 3:28 AM
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:27:16PM +, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
> Can we get the Kamailio version into a variable ?
Sure, no problem:
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.1.x/pseudovariables#version_-_version
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:26:11PM +, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
> How can I change a system variable within the route ?
What do you mean by "system variable"?
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-fre
t succesed with http_client , sorry it was my false dear
Alex..
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: sr-users on behalf of Alex Balashov
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 2:47:03 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] HTT
Yes, see async module.
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: eyas barhouk
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
Sent: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 7:50 AM
Subject: [SR-Users] pause/waiting Timer kamailio
Hello Dears
if i need to make kamailio able
le E.
Johansson
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 6:52 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] HTTP Post with JSON
So much for answering before reading the full thread. Thanks Alex!
/O :-)
> On 17 Oct 2018, at 22:18, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 20
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 08:01:59PM +, eyas barhouk wrote:
> thanks dear Alex
>
>
> i tried this function "http_client_query(url, [post-data], [hdrs],
> result)" but there is no example about how to use more than one header
> .
>
>
> if you can
r smiles out at you in the documentation:
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/http_client.html#http_client.f.http_query
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrps
be recovered on
restart, but without dialog variables or profile counts. Is this
accurate? Is it still true? Or has the amount of state serialised into
database persistence increased since then?
Thanks much!
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250
ic Kamailio"? :-) And the answer is
the same as for anything else that involves a learning process over
time.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://ww
and errors.
-Original Message-
From: Henning Westerholt
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Cc: Alex Balashov
Sent: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] force_send_socket
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2018, 13:24:22 CEST schrieb Alex Balashov:
> OK, I touched off a controversy with
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:35:54PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 07:16:43AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > The SDP-bearing INVITE and response are simply passed along as-is by
> > Kamailio, and it is the SDP which specifies where the media goes. So, if
>
Hi Joonas,
Well, that's right -- Kamailio is not especially well-suited to
forwarding traffic among more than a handful of interfaces, for
precisely the reasons you have discovered.
There are some ugly hacks around some of it available, but none are
pretty nor come recommended.
-- Alex
one shares this exact set of tacit assumptions, I imagine, and
I think that's what got folk exercised when I said "deprecated". These
functions will surely remain for backward compatibility.
-- Alex
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:07:23PM +0300, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > Le 08/10/2
Kamailio proxy B to Asterisk server C via SIP,
A and C will negotiate media amongst themselves without any intervention
or special measures on your part whatsoever.
-- Alex
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 01:12:56PM +0200, Benjamin Marty wrote:
> I would like to ask if there is any available informati
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] force_send_socket
Hi Alex,
You said that force_send_socket() is deprecated. Could you give me a
reference as i did not see this information.
Thanks
Mathias
Le 08/10/2018 à 02:27, Alex Balashov a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> 1. force_send_socket() is essentially deprecated
701 - 800 of 1124 matches
Mail list logo
