Re: [SR-Users] Accept IP/Domain Register

2022-05-10 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
As allways, there are 1 thousand ways of skinning a cat You have 3 options: 1) Create the 100 user in all the domains with the same password. 2) Disable domain in auth_check 3) On the routing logic, when you detect your 100 user, do an auth without domain chekin (kind of option 2 but only for sp

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

2021-08-18 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
> On Wednesday August 18, 2021 5:19:01, Antony Stone wrote: > > I think the overwhelming response from the group at large is that what > > you are looking to do is best handled through a variety of b2bua programs. > > Yes, I understand that. My responses to these suggestions have largely been >

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

2021-08-18 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 09:36:02, Antory Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 00:20:20, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > > > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 at 21:22:37, Antony Stone wrote: > > > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 at 21:55:15, Fred Posner wrote: >

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

2021-08-18 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Wednesday 18 August 2021 2021 5:18:51, Antony Stone wrote: > > We can also not provide a detailed solution to any problem. > > I'm not asking for a detailed solution, however I find what Raúl has referred > to as "hints" to be so vague as not to be helpful, because they just say "it > can be

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

2021-08-18 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Wednesday August 18, 2021 4:01:10, Antony Stone > > David told you how to do it with FS, > > No, he told me how to get FS to put a call *which it is processing* on hold > *inside FreeSwitch* - that is *not* what I need to do - I need to send a > command to the *existing PBX* which is handlin

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

2021-08-18 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 2021 2:33:42, Antony Stone wrote: > > If you have a DUMB SIP endpoint, as you have, that lacks the features to > > put a call on hold, transfer a call, etc. YOU ONLY HAVE 2 WAYS of solving > > that. > > > > 1) Throw that SIP Endpoint to the nearest trash bin you cou

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

2021-08-18 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:22:47, Antony Stone wrote: > > You call the API uuid_hold [uuid] or uuid_hold off [uuid] to take the > > channel out of hold. > > > > UUID in freeswitch is what uniquely identifies a given channel. > > But, would that not perform the hold function on the FreeSwitc

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

2021-08-17 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
not a B2BUA. I suggest you, first undestand the concepts you need to manage, then you will be able to pick up a tool for solving the problem. Saludos -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Serlink Telecom S.R.L.U. __ Kamailio - Users Mailing

Re: [SR-Users] Access via script to location data in the memory

2021-07-29 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
er modules like sqlops, redis, etc. to do searchs and manipulations. Saludos -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Serlink Telecom S.R.L.U. - Mensaje original - De: "Social Boh" Para: "Kamailio" Enviados: Jueves, 29 de Julio 2021 20:02:18 Asunto: [SR-Users] Access via sc

Re: [SR-Users] Time elapsed since previous message.

2021-02-10 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
What is the point of refusing a call that answer with a 100/183 "too quickly" ? ... I don't get the point on that. Saludos -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Serlink Telecom S.R.L.U. De: "David Villasmil" Para: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" Envi

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio dtmf signaling

2020-12-16 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
You could NOT build an IVR on Kamailio. Kamailio it's not a SIP-UAS, neither a B2BUA, Kamailio it's a SIP-Router with steroids, but will not handle an IVR. You should review the docs and try to undestand what Kamailio it's made for. From: "Amit Pal" To: "Kamailio" Sent: Friday, December

Re: [SR-Users] SRVCC Support

2020-09-25 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
What they told you, it's exactly the same I told you ... it have NOTHING to do with RTPEngine, It's a SIP signaling level thing, and there is no need at all to add code to any kamailio module to support "Replace" SIP headers, it's a matter of doing the right thing on the kamailio script.

Re: [SR-Users] SRVCC Support

2020-09-23 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
RTPEngine have nothing to do with RFC3891, if you whant to support Replace headers, you should do it on the kamailio routing script. Kamailio => SIP RTPEngine => RTP Don't mix their working domains. De: "Hamid Hashmi" Para: "Kamailio" Enviados: Miércoles, 23 de Septiembre 2020 8:33:05

Re: [SR-Users] Call in Progress Recovery in Redundancy

2020-08-12 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
You should first train youself about SIP, Kamailio It's a SIP-Proxy/Router, It doesn't "answer" calls ... It's just sitting in the SIP signaling path of the call. About DTMF, the same ... if you use SIP-INFO for DTMF, you will see them routed throught Kamailio, but anything more. You have a

Re: [SR-Users] Example config for webRTC-SIP kamailio.cfg for sip.js

2020-08-12 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
If by "failed on kamailiio restart", you mean than the WebRTC conection get closes, that's normal ... It's a TCP conection, that when you restart Kamailio, will be closed. From: "Johnny Ritzer" To: "Kamailio" Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 6:57:44 AM Subject: [SR-Users] Example config fo

Re: [SR-Users] How to reduce re-INVITE time in Kamailio

2019-12-18 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
You are facing the problem the wrong way. For working with softphones, that must be "wake up", your logic must be like this: ... if request goes to a push_client: hold_request() send_push_notification() endif ... if request(REGISTER) and client is marked as push_client: if holded_reque

Re: [SR-Users] Simultaneous calls in kamailio

2017-08-29 Thread Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
SIPP scenearios > De: "Logeshwaran G" > Para: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" > Enviados: Miércoles, 30 de Agosto 2017 7:01:25 > Asunto: [SR-Users] Simultaneous calls in kamailio > Hi, > Is there any way(tools) to place Simultaneous Calls in kamailio: > For Example: 1000 calls simultan