Hello again,
Indeed it must have been the version mismatch. I have upgraded all
instances to 5.5.3 and shm now reports reasonable numbers. Thanks!
BR,
George
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 14:10, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
> On 07.01.22 13:04, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
>
> Hello
Hello,
On 07.01.22 13:04, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> I see, thanks for the response. I guess I'll try upgrading all
> instances to 5.5.x for now, and hopefully that will fix it. If not,
> I'll revert to 5.4.x and post here again. If the issue does manifest
> with all
Hello Daniel,
I see, thanks for the response. I guess I'll try upgrading all instances to
5.5.x for now, and hopefully that will fix it. If not, I'll revert to 5.4.x
and post here again. If the issue does manifest with all instances on 5.5.x
however, what information should I collect to
Hello,
if you do dmq replication between kamailio systems running different
major versions, then it is likely to get memory leaks due to replication
of data and most probably cannot be fixed. This is because internal
structures of modules (also dmq commands) can change, practically what
an
Hello all and happy new year,
I have some new information to share regarding this issue. I believe the
previous metrics I sent to the list might not be indicative of the way the
problem manifests. Here's what I believe so far:
- Issue is exacerbated (or manifests) during moderate-to-high cps,
Hello,
for the sake of completion: the autoexpire should clean the items if
they are not used during the expiration interval. If you want to get
them deleted after first expiration interval always, see the
updateexpire attribute for htable modparam.
Also, note that replication should be done
Hello Daniel,
Thanks for the feedback. I think I might have been too quick to blame
htable for this behaviour. In fact, version 5.4 seems to consume more
memory than 5.5 (175129776 bytes vs 20581096), which makes sense since it
has been running for longer (I missed the extra digit previously).
Hello,
do you replicate items in the htable via dmq? Does the htable have
autoexpire value set?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 30.06.21 13:54, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
> Forwarding my reply to the list, using gmail's reply button set
> Henning as the sole recipient :-\
>
> -- Forwarded message
Forwarding my reply to the list, using gmail's reply button set Henning as
the sole recipient :-\
-- Forwarded message -
From: George Diamantopoulos
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 at 02:25
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Possible memory leak on 5.5.x (new)?
To: Henning Westerholt
Hello
