> On May 31, 2024, at 8:35 AM, Alex Balashov via sr-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 31, 2024, at 8:09 AM, Benoît Panizzon via sr-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> This would also solve another problem. We have some CPE with limited
>> memory which struggle with a long record-route list.
>
> Indeed, and t
> On May 31, 2024, at 8:09 AM, Benoît Panizzon via sr-users
> wrote:
>
> This would also solve another problem. We have some CPE with limited
> memory which struggle with a long record-route list.
Indeed, and this is why I recommended it. It would solve a larger class of
problems, above and b
Hi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>data="[sip_h_X-PGPX=${uuid}]sofia/internal/$1@${sendto}"/> application="hangup"/>
>
> I was not aware it was that simple. Thank you for the education!
Indeed. I was considering asterisk as I tend to use what I know.
But with Asterisk I would have to add quit
Fred,
This is beautiful:
I was not aware it was that simple. Thank you for the education!
-- Alex
> On May 30, 2024, at 6:24 PM, Fred Posner via sr-users
> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 30, 2024, at 5:49 PM, Alex Balashov via sr-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Benoit,
>>
>>> Snip
Benoit,
> On May 30, 2024, at 4:05 PM, Benoît Panizzon wrote:
>
> *sigh* yes I guess you may ask. Somehow I think we do 'normal' VSP
> business, but it looks like we seem to have a complicated set-up.
I think the first part of that sentence, about normal VSP business, is a
powerful intuition,
Hi Alex
> Curious: why is this necessary? Is there a possibility there is an
> unnecessary complicating assumption at the root of your setup?
>
> Maybe not, but I have to wonder.
*sigh* yes I guess you may ask. Somehow I think we do 'normal' VSP
business, but it looks like we seem to have a comp
> On May 30, 2024, at 3:23 PM, Benoît Panizzon wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately, life sometimes is not that simple, like when you have to
> find a way to process spiralling calls with rtpengine.
Curious: why is this necessary? Is there a possibility there is an unnecessary
complicating assumption a
Hi Alex
> You can use $T_inv(...) to access attributes of the original INVITE
> transaction, to which the CANCEL pertains:
>
> https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/5.8.x/pseudovariables/#t_invpv
Thank you, I'll check that out.
> However, you may instead consider the attractive simplicity
Hello Benoit,
You can use $T_inv(...) to access attributes of the original INVITE
transaction, to which the CANCEL pertains:
https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/5.8.x/pseudovariables/#t_invpv
However, you may instead consider the attractive simplicity of just calling
rtpengine_delete()
