[SR-Users] OPENSER MIB

2011-03-14 Thread Stefan Tiedje
Hi, In the Kamailio OPENSER-MIB there is the counter openserTotalNumFailedDialogSetups. This is a Counter32. The description is: The total number of calls that failed with an error. The following codes define a failed call: Question: * I'm looking for the corresponding counter to

Re: [SR-Users] OPENSER MIB

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 3/14/11 9:42 AM, Stefan Tiedje wrote: Hi, In the Kamailio OPENSER-MIB there is the counter openserTotalNumFailedDialogSetups. This is a Counter32. The description is: The total number of calls that failed with an error. The following codes define a failed call: *Question:*

Re: [SR-Users] decimal fraction problem

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, are you using kamailio 3.1.x? If not, you have to upgrade, the $branch(...) variable was updated to be writable starting with this version. I played last week with it in a need of combining serial forking with parallel forking and all is ok with assigning values to $branch(...). Cheers,

Re: [SR-Users] LCR Routes and memory allocations

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, popping in to add some clarifications/hints regarding some statements in this thread... Loading of LCR rules from database is done through private memory, but the records are loaded in chunks. So you should be fine with 4MB of memory. If it is not enough for startup/reload time, just

Re: [SR-Users] Call subscriber online

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, shouldn't the call go to location service before relaying to subscriber B? Is B at a fix address an port and that is local host port 5060? Are you doing all in your computer for testing purposes, because otherwise an application bound to localhost (like could be the softphone B) cannot

Re: [SR-Users] Register a CISCO IP phone

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, Hello, assuming is no NAT ALG as Dani Popa asked previously and there was no answer so far, here are some questions/hints that may help... On 3/11/11 12:15 PM, Dani Popa wrote: CISCO SPA 303 IP phone is under NAT? if yes, what router do you use ? Dani On 03/10/11 21:32, Pang, Gary

Re: [SR-Users] pseudo variables available in on_reply route

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 3/11/11 3:03 AM, Asgaroth wrote: Hi All, I have a requirement to perform some processing based on the source and destination addresses on a message in on_reply route. I can get source ip address using $si pseudo variable, but I cant seem to access the destination ($dd). Is there any

Re: [SR-Users] ACK not sent and rr-enforced

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I will look over it very soon. As a hint for the future, if you catch me traveling, rar files won't work for me, use tgz or zip as they are easy to expand very easy even on web mail clients. If the trace is not big, plain text is faster or eventually use some pastebin sites out there.

Re: [SR-Users] OPENSER MIB

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello Stefan, On 3/14/11 11:03 AM, Stefan Tiedje wrote: Thanks for the answer. Maybe I have some older versions of the OPENSER-MIB and the other related MIB's since I could not find the counter you pointed at. I'm using a MIB browser for reading the MIB's. Is the suggested counter expired

[SR-Users] Paging from asterisk to accounts with Multiple Registrations...

2011-03-14 Thread Derrick Bradbury
Hi all... interesting problem... I am using kamailio as the registration server for a cluster of asterisk servers. I am allowing multiple registrations on the same account to allow for parallel forking on a normal call... The problem is set paging... when I send the page to the account that

[SR-Users] change in list setup - default is now reply to list

2011-03-14 Thread Henning Westerholt
Hello, for your information - i just did a small change in the mailling list configuration for sr-dev and sr-users, now all replies goes per default to the list instead of the sender. This should help to keep the discussion on the list, especially if new people join. :-) In the past a lot of

Re: [SR-Users] OPENSER MIB

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 3/14/11 12:33 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello Stefan, On 3/14/11 11:03 AM, Stefan Tiedje wrote: Thanks for the answer. Maybe I have some older versions of the OPENSER-MIB and the other related MIB's since I could not find the counter you pointed at. I'm using a MIB browser

Re: [SR-Users] decimal fraction problem

2011-03-14 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, cc-ing to the mailing list is very important because even it is an email to show the previous answer was good, that will help other people with similar problem that search on web and read the mailing list archive to know the proposed solution worked and they can use it without asking again

Re: [SR-Users] Paging from asterisk to accounts with Multiple Registrations...

2011-03-14 Thread Ovidiu Sas
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Derrick Bradbury derri...@halex.com wrote: Hi all... interesting problem... I am using kamailio as the registration server for a cluster of asterisk servers. I am allowing multiple registrations on the same account to allow for parallel forking on a normal

[SR-Users] Registrar module creates an extra branch

2011-03-14 Thread Efelin Novak
Hi Folks, I have a problem with registrar module (I suppose). When A calls to B, is some specific situation, B receives two INVITEs. This mostly (not only) happens when one account is registered on two or more UAs. In this situation extra INVITE is sent only to the one that is second in the list

[SR-Users] Kamailio setup

2011-03-14 Thread roman
Hello everyone!!! What location I use for chrooted directory? Thanks in advance Roman ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

Re: [SR-Users] Registrar module creates an extra branch

2011-03-14 Thread Klaus Darilion
Where is the 3rd INVITE sent to? to blink, to linksys or somewhere else? Is something looping? (ngrep -d lo port 5060) klaus Am 14.03.2011 18:38, schrieb Efelin Novak: Hi Folks, I have a problem with registrar module (I suppose). When A calls to B, is some specific situation, B receives two

[SR-Users] getting fragmented packet when adding record-route header

2011-03-14 Thread Asgaroth
Hi All, I have a scenario where I have 2 asterisk media servers that, when calling a registered sip account, will forward off the invite to a location server, who looks up the contact information, then forwards the invite off to the proxy that the user registered against (done via the path

Re: [SR-Users] getting fragmented packet when adding record-route header

2011-03-14 Thread Alex Balashov
It sounds like adding the RR header adds just enough payload to push the size of your packet over the edge of being too close to the MTU boundary. There's no particular solution except to make the message smaller, and/or use a receiving endpoint that supports fragmented SIP messages. On