Hi,
Your patch didn't work for me. The kamailio didn't start if i use "if (
_rank != PROC_MAIN)"
So i commented out, both if statement, and now "out of sync problem
disappeared"
--- a/modules_k/usrloc/ul_mod.c
+++ b/modules_k/usrloc/ul_mod.c
@@ -355,8 +355,11 @@ static int child_init(int _ran
On Monday 29 August 2011, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote:
> Your patch didn't work for me. The kamailio didn't start if i use "if (
> _rank != PROC_MAIN)"
> So i commented out, both if statement, and now "out of sync problem
> disappeared"
That should do the trick, but it might be possible to create a zombi
Hi Guys,
I'm newbie in SER. I need to implement a hunting group service in SER. After
some digging in the modules I could only find AVPOPS which seems to be able
to use. I'll appreciate every advise on this.
BEST,
-- afshin
___
SIP Express Router (SER)
You have to implement it your self. It is called "serial forking". You
have to understand how forking (multiple branches) and failure route
handling works. Part's of it can be automated using the functions
t_load_contacts() and t_next_contacts(), see:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/mo
Hi,
Thank You Alex for your help!
Others? Daniel? Can You please help me?
Thanks,
Misi
2011-08-29 13:09 keltezéssel, Alex Hermann írta:
On Monday 29 August 2011, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote:
Your patch didn't work for me. The kamailio didn't start if i use "if (
_rank != PROC_MAIN)"
So i commented
On Monday 29 August 2011, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote:
> I am experiencing that in usrloc module, still more then one worker
> process share the same sql connection:
I'm sorry, the first patch was totally bogus. Due to the forking of the
childs, they have the same memory layout and a very high chance
This is my current setup, which works:
SIP client <-> SIP server.
As I've currently moved to another country I would like to be able to do the
following setup:
SIP client <-> Kamailio SIP proxy <-> SIP server.
As the SIP server only accept packets from specific IP's.
Is it possible?
I've manage
Hi, Henrik...
Sip-Router is "just" a SIP Proxy... but a dam good one...
You have to take a step back... You are mixing concepts when affirming
that SR is playing SIP-Server roles... Please take a better look on the
definitions (SIP-Proxy, SIP-Server, Registrar, etc) and find wich system
play
Hi,
I find the following:
grep "con: 17212"
Aug 29 17:05:27 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[24001]: INFO: db_mysql
[km_dbase.c:83]: submit_query: con: 17212 table: location query:
insert into location
(username,contact,expires,q,callid,cseq,flags,cflags,user_agent,received,path,socket,methods,la
Hi, Henrik...
Please, never, ever, forget to copy the list in a thread initiated
there... other may be "curious" on it... ;)
About your configuration, it seems that you just need a 'simple forward'
server. It's very simple to accomplish... Make a simple forward
configuration script (you can
i started to test sr presence and for some reason sr does not send out
any publish request when i issue one via pua_mi.
i have in route [xmlrpc_requests]:
xlog("L_INFO", "Handling XMLRPC $rm from <$si> with body
<$(rb{re.subst,/[\n\r\t]//g})>\n");
set_reply_no_connect();
set_reply_cl
Hi,
path module calls register_rrcb when "use_received" is set to 1 to
extract the "received=" param and set its content as dst-uri if present.
Now I've noticed that when e.g. a message has a pre-loaded route like
"Route: ", then kamailio (at least 3.1.3) spits the
following error message:
/usr/
Hi,
I have a question about the assignment of Role permissions to limit some
Users privileges in Siremis. I defined a user , and then a Role denying some
actions, but I couldn’t deny the action from de SER menu . The Role
permissions only show the modules on Application Menu from Administration
i added some debug to pua_mi/mi_pua_publish() function and
pua/send_publish() function and got to syslog:
Aug 29 20:57:41 sip /usr/sbin/pres-serv[3861]: INFO: pua_mi [mi_func.c:254]:
send publish
Aug 29 20:57:41 sip /usr/sbin/pres-serv[3861]: INFO: pua [send_publish.c:403]:
pres_uri=sip:j...@vm.
Juha Heinanen writes:
> pua/send_publish() function and it spits out 418 in this piece of code:
>
> presentity= search_htable(&pres, hash_code);
> if(publ->etag && presentity== NULL)
> {
> lock_release(&HashT->p_records[hash_code].lock);
> return 418;
Hello,
On 8/29/11 8:49 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes:
pua/send_publish() function and it spits out 418 in this piece of code:
presentity= search_htable(&pres, hash_code);
if(publ->etag&& presentity== NULL)
{
lock_release(&HashT->p_recor
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> looking at the xmlrpc command content, I see the E-Tag value set, for
> the first publish, shouldn't it be empty and the presence server returns
> the value to be used later for updates?
daniel,
my app that sends mi pua publish, takes etag from presentity tab
On 8/29/11 10:06 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
looking at the xmlrpc command content, I see the E-Tag value set, for
the first publish, shouldn't it be empty and the presence server returns
the value to be used later for updates?
daniel,
my app that sends mi pua
Hello,
o Daniel-Constantin Mierla on 08/28/2011 09:31 AM:
Hello,
> ...
is there any site kept updated with documentation or just some folder
in the source tree?
the combined documentation
http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/sems/doc/current/index.html
which is linked from the main SEMS site at
ht
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> The presentity table is built when a PUBLISH is received, did you sent
> another PUBLISH before so that you have a record in this table? Or how
> was it added in this table so that you could get the etag value?
there are several sources that can send publish f
Hello,
On 8/29/11 7:17 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi,
path module calls register_rrcb when "use_received" is set to 1 to
extract the "received=" param and set its content as dst-uri if present.
Now I've noticed that when e.g. a message has a pre-loaded route like
"Route:", then kamailio (at lea
On 8/29/11 10:23 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
The presentity table is built when a PUBLISH is received, did you sent
another PUBLISH before so that you have a record in this table? Or how
was it added in this table so that you could get the etag value?
there are
Hi,
With this debug i can see that all tcp connections are using the same db
connection(18549).
Any suggestion highly appreciated!
Please read collected information on the bottom of my email.
Misi
--- a/modules_k/usrloc/Makefile
+++ b/modules_k/usrloc/Makefile
@@ -8,12 +8,16 @@
include ../..
Hi all,
I am attempting to only reply to NOTIFY when the request is originating
from a user/device that is authenticated on kamailio already. There are
2 ways I've tried (below) but neither will work.
Any idea on what I am doing wrong or suggestions on how to do it right?
TIA,
Skyler
if(is
On 08/29/2011 07:28 PM, Skyler wrote:
Hi all,
I am attempting to only reply to NOTIFY when the request is originating
from a user/device that is authenticated on kamailio already. There are
2 ways I've tried (below) but neither will work.
Any idea on what I am doing wrong or suggestions on
Hi,
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:32 -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> It sounds like there might be a mismatch. For instance, if the
> registered AOR were 'sip:sky...@chopperguy.com' but the request line
> of the NOTIFY message said 'sip:skyler@1.2.3.4:5060', registered()
> wouldn't match.
>
> Cheers
Sorry, that was a stupid question. My question should be, how do I
rewrite $fu so that registered can look it up successfully?
ie: strip sip: from $fu first?
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:53 -0700, Skyler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:32 -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > It sounds like t
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> >> In the xmlrpc command, there was an etag value, have you tried with '.'
> >> as etag?
> > i haven't tried with "." etag yet. i'll try that tomorrow.
mi pua publish from different UAs on same presentity seems to
work ok, when UAs always use "." as tag param.
28 matches
Mail list logo
