Hello,
(cross-posting as this decision may be done properly with feedback from
both developers and users community).
Now that we have some band new modules but also several that were not
packaged by Kamailio, just by ser (due to single modules directory), I
was thinking we may want to recons
@Alex: thanks for reply
In this IPv4 world, most devices are in NAT, and it only matters if they
are symmetric NAT or not.
So if 1 client is behind symmetric NAT, I want to use rtpproxy, otherwise,
I do not.
According to what I read from kamailio cfg, Kamailio only knows if client
is NATed or not
On 03/04/2013 02:44 AM, Khoa Pham wrote:
@Daniel, how can the SIP proxy determine whether to use rtpproxy or
not ?
You have to set your own criteria for that. If you only want to use
rtpproxy in NAT scenarios, you can attempt to detect NAT on the far end
using some combination of flags pass
@Daniel, how can the SIP proxy determine whether to use rtpproxy or not ?
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> stun works pretty well for non-symmetric nat. If there is symmetric nat,
> then you need a rtp relay (e.g., rtpproxy) or turn server.
>
> Chee
@Daniel
Thanks for reply. But do you know what affects Kamailio in deciding whether
to rewrite c= or not ?
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for nat trversal, I suggest you use the default kamailio.cfg from later
> versions 3.3.x or upcoming 4.0. Re
Hi Muhammad,
We are following below document for Kamailio and Asterisk integration
http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb
We are plan use one Kamailio with Multiple asterisk (Queue,IVR
and Conference purpose)
Now calls are landing to asterisk with load ba
Actually I've come far to this problem
I have installed Kamailio as sip server/registrar and using default config. I
have this situation: mobile cleint using IMSdroid (extension 100) windows
client using Linphone (extension 300)
Register satus: both clients register successfuly
Both clients get
The best way to understand all NAT variations ->
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation In there they explain:
Symmetric NATEach request from the same internal IP address and port to a
specific destination IP address and port is mapped to a unique external source
IP address an
Hello,
Alright, I will try that. I temporarily fixed it by editting the .c file and enclosing the parameter with brackets. It works, but not a good approach.
Thanks!
Regards,
Grant
Van: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] namens Daniel-Constanti
Hi,
I have this memory issue again.
The status now is that I compiled kamailio as followed here and use
mem_join=1.
I reload my data from DB every minute! I know i reload a lot, will take
care of that (will update you all on April :-)).
When kamailio starts the shmem is about 17% of 4Gb and aft
Hello,
can you look at execution traces printed by debugger module just ot be
sure no subst/replcae function is executed there?
I will have to look at sources to see if there is a side effect in uac
replace from that affect the two header. Also, can you use the latest
3.3.x (3.3.4 or git bra
Hello,
seems that in 4.0 that column is named 'auth'. Anyhow, you can try via
modparam, setting 'authorization_column' to "[authorization]". If not,
rename that column and set this modparam to the new column name.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 2/28/13 3:02 PM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
I meant the colu
Hello,
stun works pretty well for non-symmetric nat. If there is symmetric nat,
then you need a rtp relay (e.g., rtpproxy) or turn server.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 2/28/13 5:48 PM, Khoa Pham wrote:
Hi David, I already read all of these. But the problem seems
contradict with what I read
On Thu, F
Hello,
there are several callbacks related to replies (e.g., received, to be
sent, forwarded). iirc, the one for dialog is when the reply is to be
sent out, which should be after the onreply_route.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 2/28/13 4:20 PM, David wrote:
Hello,
Can someone tell me which is executed
Hello,
for nat trversal, I suggest you use the default kamailio.cfg from later
versions 3.3.x or upcoming 4.0. Read the comments at the top of the file
-- practically the routing logic for nat traversal is surrounded by
WITH_NAT define.
o= line is not used for rtp relaying, but some clients
Quite strange, can you get all the output of:
make Q=0
Cheers,
Daniel
On 3/1/13 6:52 PM, Julián wrote:
Daniel
I am trying to compile 3.3.4 release
I checked the dependencies and it seems that is OK
Regards
Julián
*De:*sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.
Hello,
a crash should not happen no matter what script errors are. Also, the
log message is a warning. Besides that, the log message is printed by
process 791 and the process crashed is 796, so the reason can be related
but not necessary that one.
You got a core file, according to the log me
Is that symmetric NAT ?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:46 PM, mohavere36 wrote:
> hi, I'm struggling for 2 days to make a config file for kamailio in a
> situation where clients arein the same nat but kamailio has public IP, one
> way audio problem, does any one have a solution for it?
>
>
> _
Hi folks,
we have a serious issue with tm module. In Fail route we would like to
send a reply 404 when a cr_route function fails(no destination found).
We use t_reply("404", "No route to destination"). However after the
call is disconnected with a 404 reply the tm module writes a following
warning
I am not sure what you are trying to do. Your description is too brief to
understand. Can you send me complete call flow?
Thank you.
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Prakash N wrote:
>
>Hi Muhammad,
>
> Thanks for your mail
>
>Actually we are trying to do load balance with one Kamai
Why are you forwarding instead of relaying the message to selected
destination? Forward is stateless and therefore likely to have NAT issues,
specially if destination server is behind NAT or client is behind NAT and
destination server is unable to handle NAT etc. etc.
Also typically dispatcher is
21 matches
Mail list logo
