Hello everyone,
I'm trying to get the host part from the contact header in the sip invite
packet.
Following is the contact header format:
Contact:
What I want as result is 192.168.1.1
I searched among the pseudovairables and found $ct variable which reference
to the body of conta
Hello ,
Kind reminder on the below.
Regards,
Ali
From: Ali Taher [mailto:ata...@vanrise.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 7:01 PM
To: 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Cc: 'Ali Taher~Vanrise Technical Support'
Subject: Kamailio / issue with registrat
reply(): failed to send 200 OK
Can you please help with resolving this issue , noting that the registration
works good if I remove the routing logic set for sipcapture.
Any hint would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Ali Taher
___
SIP Express Router (SER
, 2016 2:24 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Sip_capture Module
Someone answered your partner Zainab about a question quite similar to yours.
Take a look
Thanks
2016-05-05 11:35 GMT+02:00 Ali Taher mailto:ata...@vanrise.com> >:
entire packet and not
part of it.
We are hopefully asking if you can give us a hand with that , beside the
Homer project, what we actually wanted is to know if there is another module
in kamailio that store the entire packet captured and not only the part of
it.
Regards,
Ali Taher
Hello,
I'm using sipcapture module in Kamailio to capture sip packets and save them
into mysql database.
Everything is working as expected and I got the packets registered in the
database , yet I'm wondering if there is a way to open these packets
directly in Wireshark , or do I need an interm
I need an intermediate step to convert these
packets to pcap format (if possible) in order to be read by Wireshark.
Any help or hint would be appreciated.
Ali Taher
Technical Support Engineer
T&F
M
W
A
+961-5-457437 Ext 215
+961-70-010600
<http://www.v
Hello,
Can you please help me to well understand this statement : Kamailio is a
multi-process application not multi-threading
Does this mean that if we have a machine with one processor of 8 cores ,
kamailio cannot process more than 1 call at the same time ?
Any help would be appreciated.
Hello,
I connected Kamailio to a postgresql database (through sqlops module) and
fetching result from a table containing around 300K records , where time
processing of the single query is taking around 12 ms.
I noticed that on huge load (around 200 - 300 calls per second) Kamailio is
not p
Any help regarding the below would be appreciated.
BR,
Ali
From: Ali Taher [mailto:ata...@vanrise.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:39 PM
To: 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Cc: 'Ali Taher~Vanrise Technical Support'
Subject: Kamailio mod_destroy() ERRO
Hello,
I'm getting below error when starting Kamailio.
ERROR: ctl [ctl.c:379]: mod_destroy(): ERROR: ctl: could not delete unix
socket /tmp/kamailio_ctl: Operation not permitted (1)
Any advice ?
Regards,
Ali
__
Any advise regarding the below would be appreciated.
BR,
Ali
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 8, 2015, at 2:20 AM, Ali Taher wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if kamailio can act as radius server who's responsible of
> authentication,authorization and accoun
Hello,
I'm wondering if kamailio can act as radius server who's responsible of
authentication,authorization and accounting, where kamailio receive accounting
record types (start-stop-interim) and write them in a database.
Thanks
Ali
___
SIP Express
Hello,
Suppose I have $var(a) = 1234#5678 and $var(b)=123455667
I need to get the number before '#' character if exists , meaning that from
$var(a) I must get 1234# and from $var(b) I must get empty string.
I tried $var(pref)= $(var(a){s.select,0,#}); but I'm getting the whole
string if #
,
Ali
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:16 PM
To: Ali Taher
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio invite counter
Ali,
$var variables do not persist outside the scope of the processing of a single
SIP message
: Ali Taher
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio invite counter
Ali,
$var variables do not persist outside the scope of the processing of a single
SIP message. They live in the private memory of every receiver process.
Take a look at the 'htable' or 'statistics'
in a scope per thread, so you will have a different counter in every
thread.
You should use shared memory instead:
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.2.x/pseudovariables#shv_name_-_shar
ed_memory_variables
Cheers,
Dirk
On 19-06-15 15:54, Ali Taher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to
Hello,
I want to define a counter that increase in every invite.
I tried the below :
if (is_method("INVITE"))
{
$var(u)=$var(u)+1;
xlog("L_INFO","Counter : $var(u) " );
}
But the counter is reset to 1 randomly (even before restarting kamailio
service)
How
Hello,
I just need to count the number of a specific character in a string.
For example I want to count the number of "a" in the following string :
"bbbaddaa34"
I searched among transformations but didn't find such tool.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Ali
_
Thanks Alex you saved my life!
will check and try to implement this module
Ali
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:55 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2015 03:53 PM, Ali Taher wrote:
>>
>> Can I configure kamailio to read directly from the database wi
The case mentioned is exactly our case where we deal with class 4, wholesale
carriers with many vendors; just as explained in the provided short duration
dialer video where we are using Kamailio lcr as redirect server. Hence, what
can we do in order to afford such Huge number of rules?
How did
hem in the memory? or you mean trying to compress the rules
Thanks,
Ali
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2015 12:44 PM, Ali Taher wrote:
>>
>> This is the number of rules generated from our system for LCR routi
This is the number of rules generated from our system for LCR routing (we are
dealing with transit traffic)
Ali
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2015 12:00 PM, Ali Taher wrote:
>>
>> So what memory should be allocat
Thanks Alex,
So what memory should be allocated to handle 67m buckets ?
Is there any documentation for hash tables for kamailio?
Ali
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 6:52 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>> On 06/10/2015 11:48 AM, Ali Taher wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
&
ginal Message-
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:35 PM
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR module memory concern
On 06/10/2015 11:33 AM, Ali Taher wrote:
> Can you please
List
Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR module memory concern
Ali Taher writes:
> I'm using LCR module where I have 44 million rules and 13 million rule
> targets (not all rules have destinations).
> When I'm setting lcr_rule_hash_size parameter to 268435456 (2 power
> 2
Hello,
I'm using LCR module where I have 44 million rules and 13 million rule
targets (not all rules have destinations).
Noting that I'm running Ubuntu on virtual machine with 8GB allocated memory.
When I'm setting lcr_rule_hash_size parameter to 268435456 (2 power 28) I
got the following err
Hello,
I'm testing LCR module in Kamailio and everything works as expected so far.
Before going further , I just want to ask about how much rule in LCR_rule
table and target in LCR_rule_target can Kamailio support .
We are dealing with hundreds of millions of rules and targets.
Kindly advise
Hi Daniel,
Below solution works very well.
Thanks :)
Ali
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 12:49 PM
To: Ali Taher; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio second contact header
Hello,
t
riday, June 05, 2015 10:04 AM
To: Ali Taher; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio second contact header
Hello,
the last address from next_gw() becaomes the last r-uri and that is added as
first contact. You will have to shift the URIs. Maybe the si
Hi Daniel,
Here is the log I got :
2015-06-05T10:04:35.864338+03:00 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25115]:
INFO:
xlog("L_INFO", "gateway is : $ru\n");
$var(a)=$var(a)+1;
if($var(a)!=$var(z))append_branch();
}
In this case I'm getting in contact headers the followin
y, June 04, 2015 5:28 PM
To: Ali Taher; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio second contact header
Hello,
next_gw() is also setting the r-uri, so for the last successful next_gw()
you should not call anymore append_branch(). Try to remove the last br
mented those function either).
The active branches of the request are added as contact header to the reply.
So you can practically use append_branch() as many times as you need and
then do sl_send_reply("3xx", ...). You don't need to append headers to
replies explicitely.
Cheers,
Da
Hello,
I'm trying to build new contact header that will be sent from Kamailio as
below :
load_gws(1, $rU, $fu);
append_to_reply("Contact:");
while (next_gw())
{
append_to_reply("$ru");
rsday, June 04, 2015 12:27 PM
To: Ali Taher
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Contact header read-only
Hi Ali,
Sorry, I've never used the lcr module. Whenever we build anything, we just pull
lists of gateways from our own database tables with sqlops, typically using
sql_xquery() to store the
Hi Alex,
Any update regarding the below?
Thanks,
Ali
-Original Message-
From: Ali Taher [mailto:ata...@vanrise.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 2:04 PM
To: 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Cc: 'Ali Taher~Vanrise Technical Support'
Subject: RE: [SR-Users] Kam
}
sl_send_reply("300","Multiple Choices");
any help would be appreciated.
Ali
-Original Message-
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 1:35 PM
To: Ali Taher
Su
: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 12:00 PM
To: Ali Taher
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Contact header read-only
Ali,
With the exception of a few, pseudovariables that expose parts of a SIP message
(such as
Hello,
I'm trying to change contact header in SIP response message by stripping
first characters (for testing only) as below :
$ct = $(ct{s.strip,25});
But I got below error saying that $ct is read-only:
0(15410) : [cfg.y:3419]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file
/usr/local/etc/kam
Hi,
Any help regarding the below ?
Thanks,
Ali
-Original Message-
From: Ali Taher [mailto:ata...@vanrise.com]
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 3:21 PM
To: 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Cc: 'Ali Taher~Vanrise Technical Support'
Subject: RE: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR
Hi,
I'm using LCR module in Kamailio , where matching of the rule (From-URI in
LCR-rule table) is currently based on user part of sip address in From field
(highlighted below in blue).
While we need to change the identification to be on the otg value sent in
the sip address in From field (high
Hi,
Below is the log I got (which is correct ordering)
2015-06-01T14:45:50.932170+03:00 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[58396]:
INFO:
einanen
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 11:32 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices
Ali Taher writes:
> Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1
> then 192.168.26.6.
> So in this way gateways must be ordere
iling List
Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices
Ali Taher writes:
> Everything works fine so far , yet I have a problem that last gateway
> comes first, then gateways are ordered correctly.
hard to say anything based on the information you gave. smaller tuple
priority value means
Hello,
I'm using LCR module to send multiple choices.
Everything works fine so far , yet I have a problem that last gateway comes
first, then gateways are ordered correctly.
Below is correct sorting of gateways:
First gateway : 192.168.26.4
Second gateway: 192.168.26.1
Third gateway :
Alex Balashov
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 6:48 PM
To: Ali Taher
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 300 Multiple choices
I'm not sure it can be done automatically.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States
Tel: +1-80
@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 300 Multiple choices
On 05/29/2015 11:34 AM, Ali Taher wrote:
> In this way , all gateways will be sent by Kamailio by one SIP response ?
If you like!
append_to_reply("Contact: ;q=0.1\r\n");
append_to_reply("Contact: ;q=0.2\r\n&quo
-Users] Kamailio 300 Multiple choices
Ali,
It's up to you where you pull the gateway list from. After that, you can use
append_to_reply() to construct the Contact header and send the redirect
message.
So, yes, it can be done.
-- Alex
On 05/29/2015 10:35 AM, Ali Taher wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
We need to integrate Kamailio with an exchange switch in order to have
routing decision.
Kamailio must send to the switch the list of available gateways in the
contact tag of SIP response as shown in the below example:
SIP/2.0 300 Multiple choices
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.5.112:5060
Hi,
Thanks its working good now.
Yet now when the client or the gateway stops the call , the call is still
opened at the other end.
Attached trace is for your reference.
Regards,
Ali Taher
Technical Support Engineer
T&F
M
W
A
+961-5-457437
PM
To: Ali Taher
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio not receiving BYE request
Can you provide a packet capture of this scenario, from the reference frame of
the Kamailio server?
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United
Hi,
When I'm adding record_route() to kamailio config , Acks and BYE messages
are received by kamailio , yet connection between the client and the gateway
is not properly established meaning that the gateway keeps waiting for
acknowledgement and then network failure message appear.
Below is the s
: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:44 PM
To: Ali Taher
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio not receiving BYE request
Hi Ali,
Why is Kamailio not receiving the BYE? Is it not coming through the network (as
determined by a packet capture off the wire)? Or is it not being correctly
processed, as for example because
Hello,
Kamailio is not receiving the BYE request when the call is ended by any of
call parties.
Noting that when the call is connected, a direct RTP session is established
between the user and the gateway , and kamailio doesn't receive since then
any message related to this call.
Is there
please.
Regards,
Ali Taher
Technical Support Engineer
T&F
M
W
A
+961-5-457437 Ext 215
+961-70-010600
<http://www.vanrise.com/> http://www.vanrise.com
Vanrise Building
<https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msa=0&msid=208243362929850217065.0004cbc8d6
12c5f
"L_INFO", "failure_route; code: $T_reply_code");
PS include "loadmodule 'tmx.so'" for $T_reply_code
2015-05-26 17:46 GMT+03:00 Ali Taher mailto:ata...@vanrise.com> >:
Hi,
Below is failure_route content:
f
gards,
Ali
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:24 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio drouting failure not working
Hello,
On 26/05/15 19:02, Ali Tahe
Hi,
In wireshark, I’m getting Status: 486 Busy Here | , when cancel button is
clicked.
Isnt’ that meaning that the reply code is 486?
Regards,
Ali Taher
Technical Support Engineer
T&F
M
W
A
+961-5-457437 Ext 215
+961-70-010600
&
gt; yes, status code 486 in sip flow has to match 486 transaction status in
> script
>
> 2015-05-26 19:21 GMT+03:00 Ali Taher :
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> In wireshark, I’m getting Status: 486 Busy Here | , when cancel button is
>> clicked.
>>
>> I
g at start of failure_route to determine error code:
xlog("L_INFO", "failure_route; code: $T_reply_code");
PS include "loadmodule 'tmx.so'" for $T_reply_code
2015-05-26 17:46 GMT+03:00 Ali Taher mailto:ata...@vanrise.com> >:
Hi,
hat phone is showing : “Service not available” meaning that all
destinations in avp list were tried.
Regards,
Ali Taher
Technical Support Engineer
T&F
M
W
A
+961-5-457437 Ext 215
+961-70-010600
<http://www.vanrise.com/> http://www.vanrise.
Hi,
Thanks for your fast reply.
I tried below condition in failure_route but still rerouted to next
destination when clicking on ignore.
Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Ali Taher
Technical Support Engineer
T&F
M
W
A
+961-5-457437 Ext 215
function to exit when cancel occur , but didn’t work :(.
Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Ali Taher
Technical Support Engineer
T&F
M
W
A
+961-5-457437 Ext 215
+961-70-010600
<http://www.vanrise.com/> http://www.vanrise.com
<https://ma
Hello,
I added below parameters but still didn't rerouted to second destination :(
modparam("drouting", "ruri_avp", '$avp(dr_ruri)')
modparam("drouting", "attrs_avp", '$avp(dr_attrs)')
regards,
Ali Taher
ble", "dr_rules")
modparam("drouting", "drg_table", "dr_groups")
modparam("drouting", "drl_table", "dr_gw_lists")
modparam("drouting", "sort_order", 0)
regards,
Ali Taher
Technical Support En
ot available");
exit;
}
}
route[1] {
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works
# reliably even for UDP2TCP
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
exit;
}
Appreciating your prompt reply and assistance.
67 matches
Mail list logo
