On May 5, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Joel White joelewh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on enabling presence and bla in a Kamailio + FreeSWITCH
environment
All handsets are Polycom with a handful of Grandstream ATA's
...
NOTICE: presence [subscribe.c:1030]: handle_subscribe(): Unsupported
challenge. How OpenVPN is
contributing to that I can't say. Are the clients actually seeing the responses
from Kamailio?
andrew
On Jan 15, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Andrew Mortensen admor...@isc.upenn.edu wrote:
On Jan 15, 2014, at 5:35 AM, meres mere...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Thank
Hi Bob. Looks like a problem originating in the sca_appearance_unregister
logic. I'll take a look. Can you open an issue in the bug tracker in the
meantime? Thanks.
andrew
On Nov 11, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Robert Boisvert rdboisv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Looking for some help as to why the
On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:18 AM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com wrote:
Isn't there a MAX_BRANCHES macro you can change in the source?
Yes, but as he mentions, branches are tracked in a 32-bit bitmask variable, so
he can't fork 50 branches with the existing code. I've got a preliminary
On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Johan Wilfer li...@jttech.se wrote:
Hi!
I've the following setup: Teleco - Kamailio - Asterisk(s)
The proxy has one public IP (say 1.2.3.4) and one private (10.0.0.1).
The asterisk-pbx:es has private adresses (10.0.0.2 in this example)
I noticed that if I
On Jun 13, 2013, at 7:23 AM, phil lemelin phil.leme...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning,
I'm trying to use the app_python module with Kamailio but i'm unable to even
reach a point where it loads my python module.
It's actually failing even before that. It's unable to load the db_mysql
On May 7, 2013, at 3:36 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 5/6/13 6:26 PM, Andrzej wrote:
Is it possible to run on phones Cisco 79xx series BLFs? So to show the
status of the shared lines. Phones registered with Kamailio.
look at pua_dialoginfo and
On Dec 3, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com wrote:
Hello all,
By inspecting the source code, the only difference that I could see
between kamailio and ser flavours is that kamailio has support for the
tm:local-request.
Are there any constrains in having the
I've added a basic working kamailio.cfg with Shared Call Appearances to the SCA
docs. It should help clarify where and when it's necessary to have the sca
module inspect traffic. Those of you simply wanting to test SCA can just copy
and paste the configuration, updating the listen address as
On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Robert Boisvert rdboisv...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew,
Congratulations on your new position as a Kamailio developer! When I saw
your module (SCA) I began testing immediately since it may be a stepping
stone to help me get the Polycom barge-in feature working with
I recently added an SCA module to the project. If you're willing to try the
master branch, I'd appreciate hearing how things work for you.
Here are instructions for building from the git repository:
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/devel/git
Add sca to the include_modules value in
On Nov 27, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Mark Boyce m...@darkorigins.com wrote:
Hi Andrew
Thanks for that, I'll give it a go.
Would the module work with stable branch or do I need to compile up master?
It should work with the stable branch.
andrew
On 27 Nov 2012, at 19:44, Andrew Mortensen
On Nov 26, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I want to announce that a new developer got GIT write access to repository:
Andrew Mortensen from University of Pennsylvania, USA - he has contributed a
new module: sca (Shared Call Appearances
On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
thank for contribution!
On 11/20/12 12:16 AM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:53 PM, David | StyleFlare da...@styleflare.com wrote:
Also quick read at the readme, it looks like it does
I've been working on a Shared Call Appearances module for the past several
months. It implements the Broadsoft SCA feature as laid out in Broadworks SIP
Access Side Extensions Interface Specifications document. (Another
implementation of the same feature was added to Freeswitch a few years ago,
On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:56 PM, David J da...@styleflare.com wrote:
This looks really awesome. Thanks for sharing
Thanks, and you're welcome. I've added very simple installation instructions to
the repo.
andrew
On Nov 19, 2012 4:50 PM, Andrew Mortensen admor...@isc.upenn.edu wrote:
I've
It should work with 3.1 or newer. The bulk of our testing was done with 3.2 and
3.3.
andrew
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:46 PM, David | StyleFlare da...@styleflare.com wrote:
By the way what versions does this support?
On 11/19/12 5:19 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:56 PM
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:53 PM, David | StyleFlare da...@styleflare.com wrote:
Also quick read at the readme, it looks like it does not support multi-domain
setups?
Not yet, no. I don't think it would take much work, though.
andrew
On 11/19/12 5:49 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote
Can I safely strip 100rel support from INVITEs sent by callers registered to my
proxy?
We're using proxy-generated 302 redirects for call forwarding in our
deployment. In general this works better for us than appending branches, as we
rapidly ran into branch limits when dealing with large
Hi all. I'm working on a custom module and would like to be able to send
UPDATEs to the call legs after the script forwards the e2e ACK from the caller.
I had hoped to export a function to call in my ACK handling route after the
script forwards the ACK.
However, the script stops processing
20 matches
Mail list logo
