Re: [SR-Users] Help find out where to modify request uri

2011-06-20 Thread Simone Felici
based on the above needs. Any help? Thank's a lot! Simon Il 17/06/2011 16:49, Simone Felici ha scritto: Thank you for your answer. You've absolutely right on the linked ser.cfg. I send a cleaned up and indented version. It's attached. Meanwhile I'll try out a little your solution

Re: [SR-Users] Help find out where to modify request uri

2011-06-20 Thread Simone Felici
destination based on the above needs. Any help? Thank's a lot! Simon Il 17/06/2011 16:49, Simone Felici ha scritto: Thank you for your answer. You've absolutely right on the linked ser.cfg. I send a cleaned up and indented version. It's attached. Meanwhile I'll try out a little your solution

[SR-Users] Help find out where to modify request uri

2011-06-17 Thread Simone Felici
Hi to all, I need to edit our ser installation (OLD ser-2.0.0-rc1) implementing a check to rewrite the INVITE URI address in case a flag on a DB is set or not. I'm not proof on this and as always the solution is to find out on the production system without the possibility (for now) to upgrade

Re: [SR-Users] Help find out where to modify request uri

2011-06-17 Thread Simone Felici
Thank you for your answer. You've absolutely right on the linked ser.cfg. I send a cleaned up and indented version. It's attached. Meanwhile I'll try out a little your solution. Thank's Simon Il 17/06/2011 15:40, Edson - Lists ha scritto: Simone, At a first glance, make Your magic on the

Re: [SR-Users] Force RTPProxy

2011-05-09 Thread Simone Felici
No help at all? It would be a good start point a doc to read concern this aspect. Of course, an example based on the conf could me help a lot better. Thank's to all! Simon Il 06/05/2011 10:40, Simone Felici ha scritto: Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0

Re: [SR-Users] Force RTPProxy

2011-05-09 Thread Simone Felici
on the conf could me help a lot better. Thank's to all! Simon Il 06/05/2011 10:40, Simone Felici ha scritto: Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). Due some network restrictions, we need to force every call to pass trought rtpproxy. Could someone point me

Re: [SR-Users] Force RTPProxy

2011-05-09 Thread Simone Felici
Hi Carsten, The upgrade is something I would like to do very! But at the moment there are so many customizations on the structure. Could be maintained, but the work sould be almost long. I search to understand if at least this command is implemented and then look forward. Meanwhile many

[SR-Users] Force RTPProxy

2011-05-07 Thread Simone Felici
Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). Due some network restrictions, we need to force every call to pass trought rtpproxy. Could someone point me to the right place where to force it? Please an example based on our config would be really helpful, but in

[SR-Users] Force RTPProxy

2011-05-05 Thread Simone Felici
Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). Due some network restrictions, we need to force every call to pass trought rtpproxy. Could someone point me to the right place where to force it? Please an example based on our config would be really helpful, but in

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp-udp?

2010-10-04 Thread Simone Felici
Il 30/09/2010 19:47, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul ha scritto: On Sep 30, 2010 at 19:07, Simone Felicis.fel...@mclink.eu wrote: I've just remember one more thing: try using consume_credentials() when proxy_authorize() (or radius_proxy_authorize) is successful. This will remove the auth. info

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp-udp?

2010-10-01 Thread Simone Felici
Thank you a lot for your answer! I'll try these modifications, starting from some tune on actual config of ser-2.0 to bring all working correctly and then ending with a test phase of the ser-3.0 version. I'll let you know if I should have some new issues. Thank you!!! Simon Il 30/09/2010

[SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp-udp?

2010-09-30 Thread Simone Felici
Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). The continuous groving up of our infrastructure and using even more codecs, causes the INVITE (udp) to be over 1500bytes. An external-incoming call to our proxy sip comes in with a size of ~1300 and will be forwarded

[SR-Users] Problem with ser - INVITE size problem tcp-udp?

2010-09-30 Thread Simone Felici
Hello to all! I need a little help with our ser installation (ser-2.0.0-rc1). The continuous groving up of our infrastructure and using even more codecs, causes the INVITE (udp) to be over 1500bytes. An external-incoming call to our proxy sip comes in with a size of ~1300 and will be forwarded