On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 04:08:16 PM Anthony Messina wrote:
> On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:42:59 PM Alex Balashov wrote:
> > Anthony,
> >
> > The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is:
> > m: "Test User"
> >
> > > yJ DAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUAm6UYzm
On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:42:59 PM Alex Balashov wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is:
>
> m: "Test User"
> DAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUAm6UYzm0gme>;+sip.ice
>
> And the subsequent NOTIFY is correctly targeted to this RURI:
On 23 Mar 2015, at 23:42, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is:
>
> m: "Test User"
> ;+sip.ice
>
> And the subsequent NOTIFY is correctly targeted to this RURI:
>
> NOTIFY
> sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl
Hello Everyone,
In my case I am using Path and I asterisk generate NOTIFY with route based on
path, then I see on kamailio side tries reach on client on public IP side and
open new connection not follow ESTABLISHED/RELATED link then it times out.
Log:
Mar 23 11:00:17 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kam
Anthony,
The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is:
m: "Test User"
;+sip.ice
And the subsequent NOTIFY is correctly targeted to this RURI:
NOTIFY
sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJDAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYl
On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:26:50 PM Alex Balashov wrote:
> Hello Anthony,
>
> On 03/23/2015 06:24 PM, Anthony Messina wrote:
> > In my case I am using the TOPOH module and it appears Asterisk may be
> > truncating the Request-URI on NOTIFYs*after* the 1st one. Where the 1st
> > one is if a user
Hello Anthony,
On 03/23/2015 06:24 PM, Anthony Messina wrote:
In my case I am using the TOPOH module and it appears Asterisk may be
truncating the Request-URI on NOTIFYs*after* the 1st one. Where the 1st one
is if a user gets NOTIFY immediately upon the first SUBSCRIBE, such as when
there is
On Monday, March 23, 2015 11:18:01 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> not sure you mean transaction as used inside kamailio (tm module), but a SIP
> transaction doesn't have anything to do with routing. Kamailio will be able
> to route requests/replies even when not creating transacti
Hello,
not sure you mean transaction as used inside kamailio (tm module), but a
SIP transaction doesn't have anything to do with routing. Kamailio will
be able to route requests/replies even when not creating transactions
(i.e., when it is stateless forwarding).
It looks like you get the sip pack
o: "Slava Bendersky"
Cc: "sr-users"
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 4:21:47 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
as you can see the 408 is for another request, because the cseq is 103. The
first one has cseq 102, but has no Record-Route header, whic
t; To:
> ;tag=a3aea18741
> Call-ID: 5a66b87a618d1042
> CSeq: 103 NOTIFY
> Server: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux))
> Content-Length: 0
>
> <----->
>
>
> Slava.
>
>
> *From: *"Dan
>
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
To: "Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users"
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:28:33 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
that function might be in textopsx module.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 13/03/15 14
pecially Record-Route manipulation.
>
> Slava.
>
>
> *From: *"Slava Bendersky"
> *To: *mico...@gmail.com
> *Cc: *"sr-users"
> *Sent: *Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM
> *Subjec
nt: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE.
http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
To: "Slava Bendersky"
Cc: "sr-users"
Sent: Thu
Hello Daniel,
Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE.
http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
To: "Slava Bendersky"
Cc: "sr-users"
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:09:17 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ?
Slava.
From: "Slava Bendersky"
To: mico...@gmail.com
Cc: "sr-users"
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
I have record route in
ur is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY.
>
>
> Slava.
>
> ------------
> *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
> *To: *"Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users"
>
> *Sent:
r that UDP and TCP transport in mix ?
Slava.
From: "Slava Bendersky"
To: mico...@gmail.com
Cc: "sr-users"
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello Daniel,
I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it
?
>
> Slava.
>
>
>
> *From: *"Slava Bendersky"
> *To: *mico...@gmail.com
> *Cc: *"sr-users"
> *Sent: *Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamail
-
> *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
> *To: *"Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users"
>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
>
> Hello,
>
> you have to do record_route()
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
fpaste link doesn't show anything.
Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote:
BQ_BEGIN
Hello Everyone
"Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
> *To: *"sr-users"
> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
>
> Hello,
>
> fpaste link doesn't show anything.
>
> Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamail
Hello Daniel,
Here fresh paste
http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/
I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it.
Slava.
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"
To: "sr-users"
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kama
Hello,
fpaste link doesn't show anything.
Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly.
>
> asterisk ---> private kamailio public -
Hello Everyone,
Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly.
asterisk ---> private kamailio public > soft client
http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/
I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY
is come is in. Is this something to do wi
25 matches
Mail list logo
