Re: Boiler commentary

2005-03-14 Thread Bert Edmunda
Hi Harry I could not agree more. Even elastic will only stretch to a certain point to return to its original length one over stretched it is always to slack. I remember the classic Cockenzie boiler test in Scotland a number of years ago I think the plate was 8 inch thick if my memory serves me

RE: Boiler commentary

2005-03-14 Thread Mike Eorgoff
I think that there are possibly three reasons that the units are tested to such pressures that don't necessarily have any metallurgical bearing: 1) Users may have a tendency to raise the pressure setting on their pressure relief valves above what the factory intends. Since the majority of prv's

RE: Boiler commentary

2005-03-14 Thread Harry Wade
At 12:09 PM 3/14/05 -0600, you wrote: 1) Users may have a tendency to raise the pressure setting on their pressure relief valves above what the factory intends. A bad habit to get into, but even so this cannot justify a test standard of 300% of WP. 2) Pressure gauges are not normally

RE: Boiler commentary

2005-03-14 Thread George Crawford
Excellent commentary Harry. Much needed. If you would post (perhaps you already have) the the MLS and STIG sites, this would really get your words out. Whether or not they are heeded is another matter, but you got the word out and that is what is improtant. Noel Original Message Follows