Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-05 Thread EMartin187
Jim It's no misprint. My railway descends from 2.6 feet in 33 feet from my steamup bay, down along the fence to the ground level. My brother and I regularily begin and end our live steam runs from that steamup bay. With the Fowler, I descend the grade, centering the valve gear as a steam

(was SRRL #24 problems) now 8% grade

2002-06-05 Thread SALTYCRABB
In a message dated 06/05/02 9:50:12 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's no misprint. *** [[All I can say is that I am amazed -- as you know the standard dictum is 2% or less. Can I assume that you are using R/C?]] Prototype Narrow Gauge railroads climbed 7% grades ...

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-05 Thread Sam Evans
Such grades/curves were not unknown but they presented severe operating difficulties. These kind of grades/curves generally only ocurred where unavoidable. They limited the weight that could be hauled over the line fairly severely. The Uintah used Shays and the only NG mallets in US to resolve

Re: (was SRRL #24 problems) now 8% grade

2002-06-05 Thread Dave Cole
At 4:37 PM -0400 6/5/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prototype Narrow Gauge railroads climbed 7% grades ... *** [[My comment about rod engines was in our gauge]] The Roaring Camp Railroad in Felton, Calif., says that its 8.5 percent grade is the steepest in the land. The Shays, the Climax and the

Re: (was SRRL #24 problems) now 8% grade

2002-06-05 Thread Landon Solomon
Yes, and after hours the crews talk about how hard it is on the locos and how it's more than they should be handling. :] Trot, the level-headed, fox... At 04:48 PM 6/5/02, you wrote: At 4:37 PM -0400 6/5/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prototype Narrow Gauge railroads climbed 7% grades ... ***

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-05 Thread Jeffrey Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim It's no misprint. My railway descends from 2.6 feet in 33 feet from my steamup bay, down along the fence to the ground level. My brother and I regularily begin and end our live steam runs from that steamup bay. With the Fowler, I descend the grade,

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-04 Thread Jim Curry
If you've got a full plume of steam out of the stack, but the locomotive's just sitting there, then there's a very good chance the steam is blowing right past the cylinders. This same symptom is indicative of a steam valve that's not seated. Jim

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-04 Thread NJMT
- Original Message - From: Vince Gortner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Multiple recipients of sslivesteam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:19 AM Subject: SRRL #24 problems Thanks for all the responses. I appreciate the help. The 20 PSI reading I described earlier was an error on my part

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-04 Thread SALTYCRABB
Vince Another thought before tearing into cylinders is to open the throttle wide open (beyond normal operating range) -- you may have to remove part of the cab to do this. I fixed an engine using this method last weekend. After running in this manner on blocks for a few minutes the engine

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-04 Thread EMartin187
Vince This may not be part of your problem, but I found that the Power-to-Weight Ratio on the #24 is significantly less than my Roundhouse Fowler. I bought one but returned it because it wouldn't pull up an 8% grade by it's self (with no train) when my Fowler will routinely pull 3 or 4 heavy

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-04 Thread SALTYCRABB
In a message dated 06/04/02 10:07:17 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 8% grade by it's self (with no train) when my Fowler will routinely pull 3 or 4 heavy cars up that 8% grade. I am astounded Earl. Is this a possible misprint -- or miscalculation? I can't imagine any

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-04 Thread Phil. Paskos
Interesting; I had no idea the Fowler has such tractive force. But, an 8% grade is asking a lot of any engine. My RH24 is still my favorite. Phil Vince This may not be part of your problem, but I found that the Power-to-Weight Ratio on the #24 is significantly less than my Roundhouse Fowler.

SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-03 Thread Vince Gortner
Thanks for all the responses. I appreciate the help. The 20 PSI reading I described earlier was an error on my part. I was sending the e-mail from work and was not looking DIRECTLY AT the engine while I typed, which led to the error. My safety does lift at 40 PSI (those numbers are

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-03 Thread Tag Gorton
On 4/6/02 5:19 am, Vince Gortner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for all the responses. I appreciate the help. The 20 PSI reading I described earlier was an error on my part. I was sending the e-mail from work and was not looking DIRECTLY AT the engine while I typed, which led to the

Re: SRRL #24 problems

2002-06-03 Thread Kevin Strong
If you've got a boiler full of steam, and no power, then there are a few areas you may want to look. First will be the wheels themselves. Make sure they're clean and free of caked on oil. Second, make sure the exhaust lines are clean. Even if everything's in good order, if there's a clog in the