On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 02:12:12PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> These were unintentionally committed binary files. They were used
> by the Samba project during cross-compilation, but they serve no
> purpose for us.
ACK
bye,
Sumit
___
sssd-devel mai
Hi Steven,
Thanks for review!
Comments and questions below.
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 08/14/2009 04:50 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > See the patch comment.
> > The wiki page will be really helpful during review:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/WikiPage/ELAPIInterface
>
>
>
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/2009 08:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Recently there has been a lot of activity in Trac surrounding our
> support for invoking the legacy shadow-utils tools for managing legacy
> files-based domains. This has raised some questions over the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2009 11:09 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Started looking at the ticket #107 related to
> traverse functions. Realized that the return values
> are not consistent. That overlapped with the work
> that I wanted to do for ticket #103 - errno cleanup.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2009 04:50 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> See the patch comment.
> The wiki page will be really helpful during review:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/WikiPage/ELAPIInterface
>
>
>
> --
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Recently there has been a lot of activity in Trac surrounding our
> support for invoking the legacy shadow-utils tools for managing legacy
> files-based domains. This has raised some questions over the utility of
> this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently there has been a lot of activity in Trac surrounding our
support for invoking the legacy shadow-utils tools for managing legacy
files-based domains. This has raised some questions over the utility of
this feature.
First of all, there is an un
These were unintentionally committed binary files. They were used
by the Samba project during cross-compilation, but they serve no
purpose for us.
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From e260008b0480c9ba145e1e370a93835a61a554dc M
This patch resolves https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/97
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From 74fea355d8def195385e79fa6f97fe53e60a5281 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:56:36 -0400
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/2009 11:14 AM, Mathias Gug wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> I'll try to do an upload on a daily basis to make sure master keeps
>>> building on Karmic. And I think that the Debian packagin
In the code review of the DP reconnection patch, I noticed a
build-breaking bug which I fixed in-tree and then failed to push to the
upstream tree.
This one-liner fixes the broken build. (Pushed to master under the
one-liner and urgency rules)
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking t
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> the cached entry in the backgr
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> I'll try to do an upload on a daily basis to make sure master keeps
>> building on Karmic. And I think that the Debian packaging is ready. Next
>> step is to get more testing done on the sssd packages available from the
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/2009 07:34 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:09:24AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
>> Given we use git it doesn't seem a great match.
>> If the Fedora facility do upgrade to the newer Transifex, then maybe
>> that's going to b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/14/2009 04:33 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Addressing ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/99
> See comments in patch.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/2009 09:44 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:37 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:10 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> Fix reconnection mess caused by double reconnection code.
>>> Remove one of the reconnection fa
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:37 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:10 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Fix reconnection mess caused by double reconnection code.
> > Remove one of the reconnection facilities and make code more uniform.
> > Fixes ticket 101
>
> Attached patch that correctl
I am working on removing the 'legacy' option.
The idea is to always save data in our cache using the member/memberof
schema and let backends manage how to process incoming data without
forcing all internal code to conform to differences imposed by backends.
I have pushed 7 patches to my personal t
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:10 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Fix reconnection mess caused by double reconnection code.
> Remove one of the reconnection facilities and make code more uniform.
> Fixes ticket 101
Attached patch that correctly applies on top of current master.
Simo.
0001-Fix-reconnection
Fix reconnection mess caused by double reconnection code.
Remove one of the reconnection facilities and make code more uniform.
Fixes ticket 101
Simo.
0001-Fix-reconnection-code.patch
Description: application/mbox
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel
Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Addressing ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/99
> See comments in patch.
>
Ack.
Martin
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
21 matches
Mail list logo
