В Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:54:33 +0200
Sumit Bose пишет:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:20:24PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:10:52 +0200
> > Sumit Bose wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:35:19PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:25:22
On 06/25/2010 01:54 PM, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> Would it ever make sense to send a SIGHUP
> to a specific backend to have it re-read the config without the entire
> sssd suite of daemons following suit?
>
Yes, we've discussed this before (and even tried setting it up once or
twice), but it's a c
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/24/2010 03:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Nack. As I think about this, I think that we should have the child
>> processes ignore SIGINT entirely. The monitor should be the exceptio
On 06/25/2010 02:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/24/2010 03:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Nack. As I think about this, I think that we should have the child
>> processes ignore SIGINT entirely. The monitor should be the exception:
>> it sh
On 06/25/2010 02:40 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The attached two patches provide basic NM integration. We may also add
> support for VPNs later, but that would require keeping track of active
> connections.
>
> [PATCH 1/2] DBus system bus integratio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The attached two patches provide basic NM integration. We may also add
support for VPNs later, but that would require keeping track of active
connections.
[PATCH 1/2] DBus system bus integration
Provides a mean to connect to the system bus and sets up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2010 03:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Nack. As I think about this, I think that we should have the child
> processes ignore SIGINT entirely. The monitor should be the exception:
> it should catch the SIGINT and just put it through the SI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2010 03:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Nack.
>
> You need to check the dereference of domptr+1, not the pointer address.
Ouch, thanks for catching that. New patch attached.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 03:20:24PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:10:52 +0200
> Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:35:19PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:25:22 +0200
> > > Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 201
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I realized today that the RPM packages for SSSD had the wrong version
> for libini_config. The upstream project revision was 0.4.0, but we
> were building RPMs that claimed it was 0.5.0. To further confuse
> things, in the master branch we actually HAD bumped to 0.5.0 (wi
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:10:52 +0200
Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:35:19PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:25:22 +0200
> > Sumit Bose wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55:02PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I didn't te
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:35:19PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:25:22 +0200
> Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55:02PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry, I didn't tell you that this log was from another machine, with
> > > it's own ke
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:25:22 +0200
Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55:02PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't tell you that this log was from another machine, with
> > it's own key, and therefore I changed ldap_sasl_authid appropriately.
> > On desktopvm every
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55:02PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>
> Sorry, I didn't tell you that this log was from another machine, with
> it's own key, and therefore I changed ldap_sasl_authid appropriately.
> On desktopvm everything is the same i.e. auth fails in the same way.
>
> Seems I'l
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:33:36 +0200
Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:52:32PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > В Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:48:16 +0200
> > Sumit Bose пишет:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:43:49AM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > > В Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:57:10
Hi,
Thank you, I agree with this patch, but I would like to see if Simo has
some comments about it, e.g. if he knows about other attributes we want
to include. He is away from keyboard most of this week, so I don't
expect any comments from him before beginning of next week.
bye,
Sumit
On Thu, Ju
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:52:32PM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> В Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:48:16 +0200
> Sumit Bose пишет:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:43:49AM +0400, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > В Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:57:10 +0400
> > > Alexander Gordeev пишет:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 23 Jun
17 matches
Mail list logo