Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I realized today that the RPM packages for SSSD had the wrong version > for libini_config. The upstream project revision was 0.4.0, but we > were building RPMs that claimed it was 0.5.0. To further confuse > things, in the master branch we actually HAD bumped to 0.5.0 (with a > soname bump as well). > > In order to fix this, I've attached patches to rev the version of > libini_config in SSSD 1.2 to the version of 0.5.1, and we will rename > the soname bumped version in master to 0.6.0. > > The reason for going with 0.5.1 is to guarantee that upgrades occur > cleanly (in case someone had inadvertently installed a 0.5.0 package > from master, which would be incompatible). > > > The attached patches are as follows: > 0001-Drop-release-requirement-from-versions.patch: > There's no reason that we should be requiring a specific release > number for the subpackages, since we always rev the version number > when interfaces are added. > > > 0002-Bump-libini_config-version-to-0.5.1.patch (sssd-1-2 only): > Bump the 1.2 branch version to 0.5.1 > > 0002-Bump-libini_config-version-to-0.6.0.patch: > Bump the master branch version to 0.6.0 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > sssd-devel mailing list > sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel Visual ack.
-- Thank you, Dmitri Pal Engineering Manager IPA project, Red Hat Inc. ------------------------------- Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/ _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
