https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2001
There is a bug in underlying resolv_sort_srv_reply(). It sometimes
returns less servers than there is on the input. This seems to be
related to configuration when two servers has the same priority and
weight (0). I haven't found the root cause yet, I'l
Hi,
Attached are three patches,
[PATCH 1/3] Make subdomain refresh period configurable
* Adds the ad_subdomain_refresh_period and ipa_subdomain_refresh_period
configuration options. This isn't needed to be pushed, but I think it
can be beneficial. Also, I needed to write this anyway to work wi
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:14:56PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> This patch (hopefully) fixes an interop issues with AD servers where
> they fail to realize the connection is indeed integrity protected.
>
> It's a bit of a hack as we need to work around openldap initialization
> of cyrus sasl librari
Hi,
During testing, I noticed, that all responders are logged propperly when
being shut down:
[sssd[be[DOM]]] [be_client_destructor] (0x0400): Removed PAM client
[sssd[be[DOM]]] [be_client_destructor] (0x0400): Removed NSS client
But not PAC:
[sssd[be[DOM]]] [be_client_destructor] (0x0020):
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:31:37PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 02:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (31/07/13 10:57), Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 07/30/2013 02:42 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>ehlo,
> >>>
> >>>Ensure that cmd_ctx->name will not be NULL.
> >>>
> >>>If cmd_ctx->na
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:50:51PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Pushed to master.
Also pushed to sssd-1-10
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:46:04PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 01:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2031
> >
> >> From fecd2799c21dc78fcb098e786b1c7e879e943c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:55:39PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:46:04PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > On 07/26/2013 01:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2031
> > >
>
This is just an idea, but if people like it and agree with the format it
would be nice to have it in tree.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>From c4d6cf9eb2efa1bf0330639310ee4017bc672fa0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simo Sorce
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:59:33 -0400
Subject: [PATCH]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/2013 02:11 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> This is just an idea, but if people like it and agree with the
> format it would be nice to have it in tree.
>
I like it. Ack from me.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comme
This is very ugly hotfix for ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2018
So far we were not able to find out why the slot or name_ptr
values were corrupted, but this should at least prevent segfaults.
Comments are highly appreciated.
Thanks
Michal
>From 6c376710b0dd09fc75d65eba68f22facb31
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 21:13 +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> This is very ugly hotfix for ticket:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2018
>
> So far we were not able to find out why the slot or name_ptr
> values were corrupted, but this should at least prevent segfaults.
NACK, (but close)
Please
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:17:28PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/05/2013 02:11 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > This is just an idea, but if people like it and agree with the
> > format it would be nice to have it in tree.
> >
>
> I like it.
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:30:43PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Optional (may be should be a separate ticket)
> We currently reinit by closing the file and creating a new one. We
> should not do that, we should rather reset the header and then just zero
> all the data and reinitialize all the various
14 matches
Mail list logo