On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:08:17PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 07:47 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:53:48PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> >> 2013/10/11 Sumit Bose
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:41:54PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> Thanks for yo
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 06:21:26AM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> Hi Dmitri,
>
>
> 2013/10/11 Dmitri Pal
>
> > On 10/11/2013 07:47 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:53:48PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> > >> 2013/10/11 Sumit Bose
> > >>
> > >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at
On 10/12/2013 04:43 PM, JR Aquino wrote:
This feels like a valid bug/typo.
I think it may be worth a ticket
Hi,
Benjamin is correct that it is a query to SSSD cache (sysdb). LDAP
attributes are mapped to sysdb attributes on the fly. Sysdb schema
doesn't necessarily have to correspond with LD
Oh, sorry, I shared an old branch between my devel machine and the testing
virtual machine, where i did some other changes, which i merged later on,
which caused this. Sorry..
I've merge the changes again.. And gone through the notes in this thread,
to ensure they are all included now.
2013/10/14
ehlo,
This patch fixes warning reported by clang static analyzer.
Simple patch is attached.
LS
>From 3c910455b63348e52026d9d61870ed44380e44e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:08:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] krb5: Use right function to free data.
In function
ehlo,
yet another warning from clang static analyser.
sss_krb5_princ_realm set output parameter realm to NULL and len to 0
in case of failure. Clang static analysers repoted warning
"Null pointer passed as an argument to a 'nonnull' parameter"
in function match_principal. It was possible, that re
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:16:41AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> This patch fixes warning reported by clang static analyzer.
> Simple patch is attached.
>
> LS
> From 3c910455b63348e52026d9d61870ed44380e44e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lukas Slebodnik
> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 1
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:00:44AM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I shared an old branch between my devel machine and the testing
> virtual machine, where i did some other changes, which i merged later on,
> which caused this. Sorry..
> I've merge the changes again.. And gone through t
Hi,
as promised I created the spec file changes to include the cifs-utils
plugin into the sssd-client package on Fedora and RHEL platforms where
recent cifs-utils are available.
bye,
Sumit
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
ht
and now with the patch included :-)
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:08:39PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as promised I created the spec file changes to include the cifs-utils
> plugin into the sssd-client package on Fedora and RHEL platforms where
> recent cifs-utils are available.
>
> bye,
> S
Hi Sumit,
Should the spec file also include an /etc/alternatives integration, like
cifs-utils has?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cifs-utils.git/tree/cifs-utils.spec#n90
2013/10/14 Sumit Bose
> and now with the patch included :-)
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:08:39PM +0200, Sumit Bose wro
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:15:02PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> Hi Sumit,
>
> Should the spec file also include an /etc/alternatives integration, like
> cifs-utils has?
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cifs-utils.git/tree/cifs-utils.spec#n90
yes, my plan was to include this into the spec
On (14/10/13 12:32), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:16:41AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> This patch fixes warning reported by clang static analyzer.
>> Simple patch is attached.
>>
>> LS
>
>> From 3c910455b63348e52026d9d61870ed44380e44e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>
ehlo,
In some cases, local boolean variable "do_update" could be used
without proper initialisation.
Clang static analyser warning: "Assigned value is garbage or undefined"
It was not a big problem, because non-zero value for boolean variable mean
true.
Simple patch is attached.
LS
>From 0325b79
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:37:01PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:15:02PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> > Hi Sumit,
> >
> > Should the spec file also include an /etc/alternatives integration, like
> > cifs-utils has?
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cifs-utils.git/t
On (14/10/13 16:48), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:37:01PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:15:02PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
>> > Hi Sumit,
>> >
>> > Should the spec file also include an /etc/alternatives integration, like
>> > cifs-utils has?
>> > http:
On (14/10/13 16:48), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:37:01PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:15:02PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
>> > Hi Sumit,
>> >
>> > Should the spec file also include an /etc/alternatives integration, like
>> > cifs-utils has?
>> > http:
17 matches
Mail list logo