On (25/03/15 12:09), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>On 03/24/2015 05:47 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>On 03/24/2015 04:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>On (24/03/15 16:25), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/24/2015 04:08 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (23/03/15 17:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Mon, Mar
On (25/03/15 21:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (25/03/15 14:35), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 03/25/2015 02:21 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>On (25/03/15 14:05), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/25/2015 01:51 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>Hello
On (25/03/15 14:35), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>
>On 03/25/2015 02:21 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (25/03/15 14:05), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>
>>>On 03/25/2015 01:51 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>Hello please see attached patch.
>
>The need for th
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 05:20:35PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (25/03/15 15:35), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:03:15PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> clang complains about remoing cant qualifier in casting
> >>
> >> src/sss_client/pam_sss.c:1461:73:
>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:48:42AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 16:33 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (25/03/15 11:15), Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >Hello team!
> > >So ... :)
> > >... yesterday I had to work around a bug in the rawhide build of libkrb5
> > >that rendered krb5-co
On (25/03/15 15:35), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:03:15PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> clang complains about remoing cant qualifier in casting
>>
>> src/sss_client/pam_sss.c:1461:73:
>> error: cast from 'int **' to 'const void **' must have all
>> intermed
On (25/03/15 11:48), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 16:33 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (25/03/15 11:15), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >Hello team!
>> >So ... :)
>> >... yesterday I had to work around a bug in the rawhide build of libkrb5
>> >that rendered krb5-config buggy and broke gsspro
On 03/25/2015 05:09 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (25/03/15 16:29), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/25/2015 03:21 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
Documentation to macro assert_return_code says:
Assert that the return_code is greater than or equal to 0.
The function prints an error message to sta
On (25/03/15 16:29), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>On 03/25/2015 03:21 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>ehlo,
>>
>>Documentation to macro assert_return_code says:
>>Assert that the return_code is greater than or equal to 0.
>>
>>The function prints an error message to standard error and terminates the
>>test by
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 16:33 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (25/03/15 11:15), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >Hello team!
> >So ... :)
> >... yesterday I had to work around a bug in the rawhide build of libkrb5
> >that rendered krb5-config buggy and broke gssproxy 0.4.0 build.
> >At the end I decided to av
On (25/03/15 11:15), Simo Sorce wrote:
>Hello team!
>So ... :)
>... yesterday I had to work around a bug in the rawhide build of libkrb5
>that rendered krb5-config buggy and broke gssproxy 0.4.0 build.
>At the end I decided to avoid the problem completely by switching the
>gssproxy packages to buil
On 03/25/2015 03:21 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
Documentation to macro assert_return_code says:
Assert that the return_code is greater than or equal to 0.
The function prints an error message to standard error and terminates the
test by calling fail() if the return code is smaller than 0.
Hello team!
So ... :)
... yesterday I had to work around a bug in the rawhide build of libkrb5
that rendered krb5-config buggy and broke gssproxy 0.4.0 build.
At the end I decided to avoid the problem completely by switching the
gssproxy packages to build using pkg-config instead of krb5-config.
G
On 03/25/2015 03:20 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Thanks! ci passed: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:03:15PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> clang complains about remoing cant qualifier in casting
>
> src/sss_client/pam_sss.c:1461:73:
> error: cast from 'int **' to 'const void **' must have all
> intermediate pointers const qualified to be safe [-Werr
ehlo,
Documentation to macro assert_return_code says:
Assert that the return_code is greater than or equal to 0.
The function prints an error message to standard error and terminates the
test by calling fail() if the return code is smaller than 0. If the function
you check sets an errno if it fai
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
>From b226c943557de7755cb542aa99f0e9efaa597f0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:14:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] test_ldap_auth: Use right assertion for integer
comparison
The macro assert_int_equal prints value of inte
ehlo,
clang complains about remoing cant qualifier in casting
src/sss_client/pam_sss.c:1461:73:
error: cast from 'int **' to 'const void **' must have all
intermediate pointers const qualified to be safe [-Werror,-Wcast-qual]
pam_get_data(pamh, "pam_sss:password_expired_flag", (const
ehlo,
there is a problem with allignment in tests.
patch is attached.
LS
>From 82e7579d88ac720c3dfcdfbf3b52781a10fc6d40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:29:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] test_resolv_fake: Fix alignment warning
src/tests/cmocka/test_resolv
On 03/25/2015 02:21 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (25/03/15 14:05), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/25/2015 01:51 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello please see attached patch.
The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys when
acc
On (25/03/15 14:05), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>
>On 03/25/2015 01:51 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>Hello please see attached patch.
>>>
>>>The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys when
>>>account naturally expires
>>>This patch
On 03/25/2015 02:04 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (25/03/15 14:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:51:05PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello please see attached patch.
The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ss
On 03/25/2015 01:51 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello please see attached patch.
The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys when
account naturally expires
This patch implements point number 3.
I would prefer if we didn't
On (25/03/15 14:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:51:05PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> >Hello please see attached patch.
>> >
>> >The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys
>> >when
>> >account natural
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:51:05PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >Hello please see attached patch.
> >
> >The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys when
> >account naturally expires
> >This patch implements point number 3.
On (25/03/15 12:01), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>Hello please see attached patch.
>
>The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys when
>account naturally expires
>This patch implements point number 3.
>
>>>I would prefer if we didn't add a new option as well, but since we
>>>re
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:09:14PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 05:47 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 03/24/2015 04:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>On (24/03/15 16:25), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>>On 03/24/2015 04:08 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (23/03/15 17:53), Jak
Hello please see attached patch.
The need for this patch was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys
when account naturally expires
This patch implements point number 3.
I would prefer if we didn't add a new option as well, but since we
released
a version that only supported the lockout
On 03/24/2015 10:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:57:05PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/19/2015 12:53 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I created two wiki pages to help our users troubleshoot their setups and
file better bug reports. I hope the information captured there wou
On 03/24/2015 07:42 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
1st patch fixes a typo in a debug message found by Kaushik.
While grepping the code for the typo I found it at a few more places -
please see 2nd patch.
I we decide to to ack 2nd patch, please feel free to squash it into the
first one.
Thanks
On 03/24/2015 05:47 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/24/2015 04:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/03/15 16:25), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/24/2015 04:08 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/03/15 17:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On
Hello,
attached patch deprecates lockout option in 1-12 branch.
This was discussed in thread: SDAP: Lock out ssh keys when account naturally
expires
This patch implements point number 2.
I would prefer if we didn't add a new option as well, but since we released
a version that only supported
32 matches
Mail list logo
