URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/109
Title: #109: SSSCTL: fix netgroup-show parsing
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/109#issuecomment-266932506
___
s
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/109
Title: #109: SSSCTL: fix netgroup-show parsing
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/109#issuecomment-266932502
___
s
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/109
Author: justin-stephenson
Title: #109: SSSCTL: fix netgroup-show parsing
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
the ldb Name attribute is not fully-qualified for netgroups like it
is for user and group objects, sssctl should skip sss_output_name()
for netgroup e
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89
Title: #89: nss: rewrite nss responder so it uses cache_req
lslebodn commented:
"""
I almost forgot to write the most important message. AD related tests passed.
LDAP related tests passed; there are some intermittent failures; but maybe not
related to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89
Title: #89: nss: rewrite nss responder so it uses cache_req
lslebodn commented:
"""
I had a few inline comments; mostly nitpicks
CI passed (rawhide failure is unrelated
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/58/78/summary.html
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89
Title: #89: nss: rewrite nss responder so it uses cache_req
lslebodn commented:
"""
Just for the record; the last update fixed netgroup memory leak for long living
clients
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89#issuecomment-2
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
jhrozek commented:
"""
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:16:33AM -0800, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 08:02 -0800, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:06:58AM
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
simo5 commented:
"""
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 08:02 -0800, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:06:58AM -0800, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 05:59 -0800, J
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
jhrozek commented:
"""
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:06:58AM -0800, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 05:59 -0800, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:44:44AM
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
simo5 commented:
"""
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 05:59 -0800, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:44:44AM -0800, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 02:25 -0800, f
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
jhrozek commented:
"""
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 02:44:44AM -0800, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 02:25 -0800, fidencio wrote:
> > Pavel,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 a
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/106
Title: #106: Add a new "files" provider
pbrezina commented:
"""
I though it will be a small change, but if it is going to affect the code more
widely, I'll wait.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/106#issuecomment-266711979
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89
Title: #89: nss: rewrite nss responder so it uses cache_req
pbrezina commented:
"""
Fixed.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89#issuecomment-266708967
___
sssd-devel mailing list -
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
simo5 commented:
"""
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 02:25 -0800, fidencio wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Pavel Březina
> wrote:
>
> > There are two scenarios:
>
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
fidencio commented:
"""
Pavel,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Pavel Březina
wrote:
> There are two scenarios:
>
>1. timeshift during system boot -- it is very common to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
pbrezina commented:
"""
There are two scenarios:
1) timeshift during system boot -- it is very common to be several hours
2) timeshift due to an ntp update when booted up -- usua
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Author: fidencio
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/107/head:pr107
git checkout pr107
F
17 matches
Mail list logo
