[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework fidencio commented: """ @mrniranjan, on SSSD we, at least, try enforce 80. You can see by the https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379. So, in case we have that PR merged, we'd be officially enforcin

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread mrniranjan
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework mrniranjan commented: """ I am unable to access the link given """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139#issuecomment-344157048 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#449][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449 Title: #449: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ ok to test """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449#issuecomment-344157080 ___ sssd-devel mailing lis

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread mrniranjan
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework mrniranjan commented: """ I have fixed most of the errors suggested, i would like if you we don't enforce 80chars limit, the readeability really hampers, Can we have 90 or 100 character limit . "

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread mrniranjan
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework mrniranjan commented: """ I am unable to access http://vm-031.$%7babc%7d/logs/job/81/13/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139#issuecomment-344157048 _

[SSSD] [sssd PR#448][comment] common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448 Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format fidencio commented: """ Ack! I'll fire an internal CI run just for the sake of the process and add the "Accepted" label when I get the result. Thanks for the contribution, @amitkumar5

[SSSD] [sssd PR#448][comment] common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448 Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format fidencio commented: """ ok to test """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448#issuecomment-344156272 ___ sssd-devel

[SSSD] [sssd PR#449][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-11-13 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449 Title: #449: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449#issuecomment-344152517 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#449][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-11-13 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449 Title: #449: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449#issuecomment-344152516 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#449][opened] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-11-13 Thread amitkumar50
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #449: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req Action: opened PR body: """ The cache_req code doesn't check the min_id/max_id boundaries for requests by ID. Extending the .lookup_fn function in each plugin that searches b

[SSSD] [sssd PR#448][comment] common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format

2017-11-13 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448 Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448#issuecomment-344130857

[SSSD] [sssd PR#448][opened] common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format

2017-11-13 Thread amitkumar50
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format Action: opened PR body: """ The cache-req debug string representation uses a wrong format specifier for by-ID requests. %d should be replaced with %"SPRIgid". Re

[SSSD] [sssd PR#448][comment] common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format

2017-11-13 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448 Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448#issuecomment-344130858

[SSSD] [sssd PR#405][+Changes requested] WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405 Title: #405: WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift Label: +Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#405][comment] WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405 Title: #405: WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift fidencio commented: """ Actually, I've just realised that the comment about unnecessarily adding string.h was not fixed yet, thus adding the "Changes Requested" label. """ See the

[SSSD] [sssd PR#405][-Accepted] WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405 Title: #405: WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift Label: -Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#405][+Accepted] WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405 Title: #405: WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#405][comment] WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405 Title: #405: WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift fidencio commented: """ Patch looks okay to me. I'm adding the "Accepted" label. @vtapia, thanks for the contribution and sorry for the long delay to review it and get it merged.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][synchronized] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Author: fidencio Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/444/head:pr444 gi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 fidencio commented: """ Changes done, thanks for the review. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444#issuecomment-343996647

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][synchronized] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Author: fidencio Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/444/head:pr444 gi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 lslebodn commented: """ Patch will be the same as in sssd-1-14 branch therefore closing. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445#iss

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][+Rejected] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 Label: +Rejected ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to ss

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][closed] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Author: fidencio Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/445/head:pr445 git chec

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][-Accepted] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 Label: -Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to ss

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][-Accepted] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 Label: -Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to ss

[SSSD] Re: SSSD Virtual Test Suite

2017-11-13 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: > Hello, > > It took me a lot longer than I expected but here it is at last. This is my > set of scripts that use vagrant and Ansible to automatically provision > virtual environment that I use to develop and test SSSD. > > To create this envi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#443][+Pushed] NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443 Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout() Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@l

[SSSD] [sssd PR#443][closed] NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443 Author: fidencio Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout() Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/443/head:pr443 git checkout pr443 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#443][comment] NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443 Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout() jhrozek commented: """ * master: f6a1cef87abdd983d6b5349cd341c9a249826577 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443#issuecomment-343971982 _

[SSSD] [sssd PR#432][closed] CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432 Author: mzidek-rh Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/432/head:pr432 git checkout pr432

[SSSD] [sssd PR#432][+Pushed] CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432 Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#432][comment] CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432 Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts jhrozek commented: """ * master: 39d6a3be119b050b0690152b6b443117c8617b1c """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432#issuecomment-343970599 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][+Pushed] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][comment] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning jhrozek commented: """ * master: b739b3e767c053bb3a7e6651514896b30502d838 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447#issuecomment-343969806 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][closed] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Author: fidencio Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/447/head:pr447 git checkout pr447

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework fidencio commented: """ whitespace tests failed, please, take a look at: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/81/13/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139#issueco

[SSSD] [sssd PR#432][+Accepted] CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432 Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahoste

[SSSD] [sssd PR#432][comment] CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432 Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts fidencio commented: """ @justin-stephenson, nice, thanks! I'm adding the "Accepted" label to this PR based on the discussion we had during the team meeting and in the feedback provided by @j

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework fidencio commented: """ So, just by running pep8 in the python files I've seen: ``` [ffidenci@pessoa sssd]$ pep8 src/tests/multihost/basic/conftest.py src/tests/multihost/basic/test_basic.py src/te

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework fidencio commented: """ retest this, please """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139#issuecomment-343961592 ___ sssd-devel mail

[SSSD] [sssd PR#432][comment] CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts

2017-11-13 Thread justin-stephenson
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432 Title: #432: CACHE_REQ: Better debugging for email conflicts justin-stephenson commented: """ @fidencio man page verbiage looks good to me. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/432#issuecomment-343960502 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#433][+Pushed] PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/433 Title: #433: PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#433][closed] PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/433 Author: sumit-bose Title: #433: PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/433/head:pr433 git checkout pr433 _

[SSSD] [sssd PR#433][comment] PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/433 Title: #433: PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard lslebodn commented: """ master: * 57cefea8305a57c1c0491afb739813b7f17d5a25 * 177ab84f0e336b75289a3ac0b2df25bd5ab5198b * 08d1f8c0d6eece6a48201d7f8824b282eac3458d * fd6f4047b58686bd4057c9859c3c804a77b

[SSSD] Re: Question about memory mapped cache

2017-11-13 Thread Sumit Bose
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote: > On 11/08/2017 11:28 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while trying to prepare some diagrams to illustrate how the memory mapped > > cache works I realized that we might not use the payload factor as > > expected. > > > > In sss_m

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework fidencio commented: """ @mrniranjan, no updates on this at all. Although it's on top of my TODO list, downstream work has been prioritized (sorry about that). """ See the full comment at https:/

[SSSD] [sssd PR#139][comment] Initial revision of sssd pytest framework

2017-11-13 Thread mrniranjan
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139 Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework mrniranjan commented: """ @lslebodn @fidencio any update on this. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139#issuecomment-343939581 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#443][+Accepted] NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443 Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout() Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 fidencio commented: """ Adding "Accepted" label per @pbrezina's review. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444#issuecomment-3439076

[SSSD] [sssd PR#443][comment] NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443 Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout() fidencio commented: """ Adding "Accepted" label per @pbrezina's review. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443#issuecomment-343907653 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][+Accepted] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to ss

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][+Accepted] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.o

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 fidencio commented: """ Adding "Accepted" label per @pbrezina's review. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445#issuecomment-3439075

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][+Accepted] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to ss

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][comment] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning fidencio commented: """ Adding "Accepted" label per @pbrezina's review. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447#issuecomment-343907442

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 fidencio commented: """ @pbrezina, thanks for the review. I've changed the commit message. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444#i

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 fidencio commented: """ @pbrezina, thanks for the review. I've changed the commit message. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445#i

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][synchronized] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Author: fidencio Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/445/head:pr445 gi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][comment] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning pbrezina commented: """ Ack. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447#issuecomment-343895443 ___ sssd-devel mailing list --

[SSSD] [sssd PR#445][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13

2017-11-13 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/445 Title: #445: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.13 pbrezina commented: """ Ack. Just the commit message still talkes about `enum_ctx` which is not present on 1.13. """ See the full comment at https://github.c

[SSSD] [sssd PR#444][comment] NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14

2017-11-13 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444 Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch for SSSD-1.14 pbrezina commented: """ Ack. Just the commit message still talkes about `enum_ctx` which is not present on 1.14. """ See the full comment at https://github.c

[SSSD] [sssd PR#443][comment] NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()

2017-11-13 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443 Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout() pbrezina commented: """ If `enum_ctx` is freed than the timeout is canceled. Ack. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443#issuecomment-343893828 _

[SSSD] [sssd PR#412][comment] Gpo contributed patches

2017-11-13 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/412 Title: #412: Gpo contributed patches mzidek-rh commented: """ @fidencio Dan did run the tests and I had results, but the tests were all failing due to SSSD not been able to start. IIRC it was due to wrong selinux policy installed in the testing VM. So

[SSSD] SSSD Virtual Test Suite

2017-11-13 Thread Pavel Březina
Hello, It took me a lot longer than I expected but here it is at last. This is my set of scripts that use vagrant and Ansible to automatically provision virtual environment that I use to develop and test SSSD. To create this environment you only need to run one command: $ ./setup.sh and afte

[SSSD] [sssd PR#433][comment] PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard

2017-11-13 Thread sumit-bose
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/433 Title: #433: PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard sumit-bose commented: """ The latest version fixes @lslebodn's comment and modifies a filter in the whitespace test so that the added NSS database files are skipped as well. """ See the full comme

[SSSD] [sssd PR#433][comment] PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/433 Title: #433: PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard lslebodn commented: """ BTW fix for whitespace on my laptop ``` echo "" >> src/tests/cmocka/p11_nssdb_2certs/key4.db echo "" >> src/tests/cmocka/p11_nssdb_2certs/cert9.db ``` it was simpler than ad

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][opened] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Author: fidencio Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning Action: opened PR body: """ There's no reason to check for both ret != EOK and sanitized == NULL, as the second should never ever happen. This check is causing a clang warning

[SSSD] [sssd PR#447][edited] SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/447 Author: fidencio Title: #447: SYSDB: Remove code causing a covscan warning Action: edited Changed field: body Original value: """ There's no reason to check for both ret != EOK and sanitized == NULL, as the second should never ever happen. This chec

[SSSD] [sssd PR#433][comment] PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard

2017-11-13 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/433 Title: #433: PAM: Multiple certificates on a Smartcard lslebodn commented: """ FYI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512212 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/433#issuecomment-343842285 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#405][comment] WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405 Title: #405: WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift fidencio commented: """ @lslebodn, please, could you take a look in the second version of this patch or let me know if you cannot? This PR has been stuck for 18 days without **any

[SSSD] [sssd PR#412][comment] Gpo contributed patches

2017-11-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/412 Title: #412: Gpo contributed patches fidencio commented: """ @mzidek-rh, I know you're busy with a few other stuff, but would be possible to at least give an update on this ticket? It's already been 24 days without **any** update. So, Have you talked