URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405
Title: #405: WATCHDOG: Restart providers with SIGUSR2 after time drift
lslebodn commented:
"""
@fidencio have you had a time to run regression tests?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/405#issuecomment-344841816
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448
Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format
fidencio commented:
"""
@amitkumar50, you made the changes addressing only half of @lslebodn's comments.
@lslebodn said:
"This one is for UID. So it should be SPRIuid ..."
Okay, it's
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448
Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format
Label: +Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@l
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448
Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format
Label: -Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@l
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449
Author: amitkumar50
Title: #449: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/449/head:pr449
git checkout pr449
From 630b9fc87b5
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448
Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format
amitkumar50 commented:
"""
Are some changes required? Label is 'Changed Requested'
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448#issuecomment-344817280
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
mrniranjan commented:
"""
Till we have some idea on the review process, the directory structure of where
tests should be pushed and how to run those tests , i am okay with not having
PUSH access.
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
jhrozek commented:
"""
Sure, thanks for the clarification.
About the push privileges, I would just prefer to drop a mail to sssd-devel
before granting push privileges to someone who was not previo
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
fidencio commented:
"""
So, based that the tests would be reviewed by people currently working on the
test development, at least in the beginning, I'd like that @mrniranjan could
have push access
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
jhrozek commented:
"""
Sure, but I'm not sure what exactly I'm supposed to do :-)
What exact permissions does @mrniranjan need? Does this include push privileges
in order to push patches? (IIRC wh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443
Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()
fidencio commented:
"""
I didn't. As I said in the first comment, I was **not** able to reproduce the
issue at all, even with the steps you mentioned in the bugzilla.
"""
S
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/443
Title: #443: NSS: Use enum_ctx as memory_context in _setnetgrent_set_timeout()
lslebodn commented:
"""
@fidencio Have you find a reason why we reached timeout?
I would expect that backend should return something to nss responder.
"""
See the full com
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444
Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch
for SSSD-1.14
lslebodn commented:
"""
sssd-1-14:
* e2ee9ff3bcd321c5ab9746a83ce81aaaf71f5355
sssd-1-13:
* 6c39572b99fc43979931d2f12f15343cdbfcf6a0
"""
See the full comment a
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444
Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch
for SSSD-1.14
Label: +Pushed
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444
Author: fidencio
Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch
for SSSD-1.14
Action: closed
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/444/head:pr444
git chec
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
fidencio commented:
"""
With this code being pushed I'd like to ask for:
- Add @mrniranjan as SSSD mantainer
- Create a pagure session for issues related to this code
@jhrozek, could you do both?
"
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
fidencio commented:
"""
Ack!
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139#issuecomment-344591542
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sss
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444
Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch
for SSSD-1.14
pbrezina commented:
"""
Ah, sorry, you haven't pushed it, just closed it. My bad. Having it on `netgr`
context is safer and more correct in my opinion. But fee
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444
Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch
for SSSD-1.14
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (15/11/17 11:54), Pavel Březina wrote:
>You have already pushed version with `netgr` into 1.13 (#445). I don't think
>we need to hav
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444
Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch
for SSSD-1.14
pbrezina commented:
"""
You have already pushed version with `netgr` into 1.13 (#445). I don't think we
need to have three different patches in three different
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/449
Title: #449: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req
jhrozek commented:
"""
@pbrezina I'm still running some tests with my patches, but in general they are
ready and published in my gc_uid branch.
btw see the downtream report - we were already ask
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
Label: -Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedoraho
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/448
Author: amitkumar50
Title: #448: common: Correction of cache_req debug string ID format
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/448/head:pr448
git checkout pr448
From
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
mrniranjan commented:
"""
Thanks will apply the changes suggested and resend the patch
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139#issuecomment-344558254
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
fidencio commented:
"""
I've been able to test the patches with some documentation sent by @mrniranjan.
As this documentation is related to provisioning downstream infra, it's not
worth (nor allow
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444
Title: #444: NSS: Use netgr as memory context in set_netgr_lifetime() - Patch
for SSSD-1.14
lslebodn commented:
"""
@pbrezina can it be pushed?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/444#issuecomment-344556887
_
27 matches
Mail list logo
