Re: [SSSD] Cached user info?

2012-05-18 Thread Braden McDaniel
[Sorry for the delay following up on this...] On 5/14/12 3:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: You are correct. The object is expired but the problem is that your queries for mock group don't reach SSSD, thus making it unable to refresh the record. Try getent -s sss group mock, that might do the trick. A

Re: [SSSD] Cached user info?

2012-05-11 Thread Braden McDaniel
On 5/11/12 10:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 10:19 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: As I mentioned at the top of the thread, I changed the local group GID on the Fedora 16 installation to 989 (from 990) to match the Fedora 17 installation. Things appear to be working fine

Re: [SSSD] Cached user info?

2012-05-11 Thread Braden McDaniel
run ldbsearch -H > /var/lib/sss/db/cache_.ldb and paste me the object > representing the user? You can also look if there is a group object with GID > 990 just to be sure. I think we're onto something here. The object for my user: dn: name=braden,cn=users,cn=default,cn=

Re: [SSSD] Cached user info?

2012-05-11 Thread Braden McDaniel
nd still the user appears to be > > a member of pulse-access (rather than mock). > > And when you run getent group mock, the GID is correct or still wrong? $ getent group mock mock:x:989: That's correct (that is, it's consistent with that's in LDAP); but it was correct b

Re: [SSSD] Cached user info?

2012-05-10 Thread Braden McDaniel
ory cache to expire > as well (or you can just restart SSSD). Sounds promising... but I tried that (as well as -U and -N), restarted sssd, logged out and logged back in... and still the user appears to be a member of pulse-access (rather than mock). --

[SSSD] Cached user info?

2012-05-10 Thread Braden McDaniel
p with GID 990; and now the group *name* is being got from LDAP, associated with the old GID, and that old GID is being conveyed to tools that (rightfully) associate GID 990 with the local pulse-access group. Can anyone shed some light on what might be happening here? -- Braden McDaniel ___

Re: [SSSD] Kerberos login

2012-04-18 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 13:18 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > On 04/17/2012 01:59 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:35:57PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > >> Is it the case that local authentication, if available, is simply > >> preferred to Kerberos?

Re: [SSSD] Kerberos login

2012-04-16 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 09:19 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > On 04/16/2012 01:29 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 15:37 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > > >> I've had more or less the same experience upon a fresh install of the > >> Fedor

Re: [SSSD] Kerberos login

2012-04-15 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 15:37 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > I've had more or less the same experience upon a fresh install of the > Fedora 17 prerelease on a different machine. This one's working fine, now; I had forgotten to add a host principal for the machine. The Fedora 1

Re: [SSSD] Kerberos login

2012-04-15 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 20:24 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:51:01PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > I have set up Kerberos and OpenLDAP on Fedora 16. For the most part, > > things seem to be working; I can use "kinit" to get a Kerberos ticket.

[SSSD] Kerberos login

2012-04-13 Thread Braden McDaniel
nfig-authentication", the authentication method is set to "Kerberos password". Where should I be looking to see what's missing? -- Braden McDaniel ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel