-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/2010 07:42 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/03/2010 07:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/01/2010 05:56 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Both your points are valid. I'm attaching a patch where the check is
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/01/2010 05:56 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Both your points are valid. I'm attaching a patch where the check is
performed. I still think it is redundant, but it might be more safe in
the future in case the code around it changes.
Nack.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/2010 07:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/01/2010 05:56 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Both your points are valid. I'm attaching a patch where the check is
performed. I still think it is redundant, but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/01/2010 05:56 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Both your points are valid. I'm attaching a patch where the check is
performed. I still think it is redundant, but it might be more safe in the
future in case the code around it changes.
Nack.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 07:56 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/31/2010 07:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
0003-Fixed-printing-of-undefined-value-in-sdap_async_acco.patch
Ticket:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/02/2010 12:18 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/31/2010 07:56 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/31/2010 07:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/31/2010 07:57 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
0005-Deleted-some-needless-assignments.patch
Ticket: #582
I think we should check for potential errors from sdap_id_op_done()
calls instead of removing
I'm attaching some patches fixing various minor issues found by clang:
0001-Initialized-return-value-in-dp_copy_options.patch
Ticket: #577
0002-Fixed-potential-comparison-of-undefined-variable.patch
Ticket: #578
0003-Fixed-printing-of-undefined-value-in-sdap_async_acco.patch
Ticket: #579
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 09:59 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
I'm attaching some patches fixing various minor issues found by clang:
0001-Initialized-return-value-in-dp_copy_options.patch
Ticket: #577
ACK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 05:41 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 08/31/2010 09:59 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
I'm attaching some patches fixing various minor issues found by clang:
0001-Initialized-return-value-in-dp_copy_options.patch
Ticket: #577
ACK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 01:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
0004-Fixed-uninialized-value-in-proxy_id-provider.patch
Ticket: #580
I guess NSS_STATUS_UNAVAIL is as good as any of the others in this case,
so ACK
I don't understand this comment,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
0003-Fixed-printing-of-undefined-value-in-sdap_async_acco.patch
Ticket: #579
Provided that it is safe to pass a NULL pointer to fprintf(), this is
OK. I know that glibc handles this, but I'm not entirely sure if that it
is good behaviour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 07:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
0003-Fixed-printing-of-undefined-value-in-sdap_async_acco.patch
Ticket: #579
Provided that it is safe to pass a NULL pointer to fprintf(), this is
OK. I know
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/31/2010 07:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
0003-Fixed-printing-of-undefined-value-in-sdap_async_acco.patch
Ticket: #579
Provided that it is safe to pass a NULL pointer to fprintf(), this is
OK. I
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
0005-Deleted-some-needless-assignments.patch
Ticket: #582
I think we should check for potential errors from sdap_id_op_done()
calls instead of removing the assignments altogether.
I agree with Jakub. These assignments shouldn't be removed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 07:57 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
0005-Deleted-some-needless-assignments.patch
Ticket: #582
I think we should check for potential errors from sdap_id_op_done()
calls instead of removing the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/14/2009 01:42 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 12/11/2009 10:38 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
0001: I got an error with older python version when just calling exit().
'TypeError: 'str' object is not callable'
Ack. Good catch.
Pushed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2009 10:38 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
0001: I got an error with older python version when just calling exit().
'TypeError: 'str' object is not callable'
Ack. Good catch.
0002: make check failed when using the tar ball, because
Hi,
0001: I got an error with older python version when just calling exit().
'TypeError: 'str' object is not callable'
0002: make check failed when using the tar ball, because elapi_ut.conf
was missing
0003: Older versions of check do not have test loops.
bye,
Sumit
From
19 matches
Mail list logo