On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:39:40PM +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> #0001:
> Still Ack
>
> #0002:
> Ack
>
> #0003:
> I'm not sure why you moved the declarations of sysdb_svc_add() and
> sysdb_svc_remove_alias() into this patch, but I guess it's just a cosmetic
> issue, so I have no problem with that.
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 18:39 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> #0001:
> Still Ack
>
> #0002:
> Ack
>
> #0003:
> I'm not sure why you moved the declarations of sysdb_svc_add() and
> sysdb_svc_remove_alias() into this patch, but I guess it's just a cosmetic
> issue, so I have no problem with that.
>
In
#0001:
Still Ack
#0002:
Ack
#0003:
I'm not sure why you moved the declarations of sysdb_svc_add() and
sysdb_svc_remove_alias() into this patch, but I guess it's just a cosmetic
issue, so I have no problem with that.
Ack
#0004:
I've got another segfault for you ;-) You fixed the original but y
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 18:31 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:48 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 11:19 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:03 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:12:15PM -0500, S
> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:48 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 11:19 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:03 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:12:15PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:54
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:48 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 11:19 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:03 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:12:15PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:54 -0500, St
On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 11:19 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:03 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:12:15PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:54 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > These patches add support for getserv
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:12:15PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:54 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > These patches add support for getservbyname() and getservbyport() to
> > the NSS responder. They do not yet support enumeration of services
> > through setservent(),
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 02:20 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:54 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Patch 0001: Make the sized_string structure available elsewhere in the
> > source.
>
> ACK.
>
> > Patch 0002: Add support for strtouint16 (needed for managing the port
> > number
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 16:54 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> These patches add support for getservbyname() and getservbyport() to
> the NSS responder. They do not yet support enumeration of services
> through setservent(), getservent() and endservent(). These patches also
> include a reference im
10 matches
Mail list logo