-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2009 09:51 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Hi,
Please find a series of patches related to $subj.
0001 - Trace improvements. See patch comments. (independent patch)
Ack
0003 - Collection enhancements needed for ELAPI
Ack.
0006 - Cleaning
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:51 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
0002 - Dhash improvement. See patch comments. (independent patch)
I am leaning on nacking this one.
It is redundant and basically just duplicates code.
The only difference between hash_lookup+hash_delete and hash_remove is
one less lookup, if
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:51 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
0002 - Dhash improvement. See patch comments. (independent patch)
I am leaning on nacking this one.
It is redundant and basically just duplicates code.
The only difference between hash_lookup+hash_delete and
On 12/08/2009 12:35 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:51 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
0002 - Dhash improvement. See patch comments. (independent patch)
I am leaning on nacking this one.
It is redundant and basically just duplicates code.
The only difference
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:43 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
I think Simo's suggestion of using the delete callback in these cases
is
the best idea. If you allow returning values from the delete
operation
you have the potential for inconsistencies. How do you know if value
returned is still
Hi,
Please find a series of patches related to $subj.
0001 - Trace improvements. See patch comments. (independent patch)
0002 - Dhash improvement. See patch comments. (independent patch)
0003 - Collection enhancements needed for ELAPI
0006 - Cleaning FIXME comments in collection (ticket #157)
