[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-09-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ Ah, somehow seems that I cannot reopen the PR. So, I'm opening a new one. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50#issuecomment-328271998 _

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-09-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ So, I've re-worked those patches a little bit and here is the time difference when running reconfing with the patches: ``` real0m26.047s user0m21.318s sys 0m4.635s

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ It's been almost 2 months this code has been around and there's anyone interested to review. So, I'm closing the PR (as "rejected") as this patchset doesn't seem to be useful

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-10 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ So, here are some stats about the configure time that you complained before: So, I've ran the contrib/ci/run script on our F25 machine on Jenkins. This is what we have **withou

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-10 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ So, here are some stats about the configure time that you complained before: So, I've ran the contrib/ci/run script on our F25 machine on Jenkins. This is what we have **withou

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ @lslebodn: After some proper checking, seems that all "-Wunitialized" reports are false positives, so I've removed the patches from this series. I've added "Reviewed-by: " to t

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ Lukáš, I'm afraid you didn't understand how the usage of the GNULIB's compiler warnings is supposed to be. There are basically 3 essential files: - warnings.m4 - manywarnings.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ Disabling Werror on RHEL6 will be just a matter of passing "--enable-werror=no" to configure. It should be **really** simple as long as we agree on doing that. About the extra

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code lslebodn commented: """ On (09/11/16 07:54), fidencio wrote: >@lslebodn, a way easier solution would be to disable -Werror when running CI >on RHEL6 than fixing those issues only caught there. Is ther

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ @lslebodn, a way easier solution would be to disable -Werror when running CI on RHEL6 than fixing those issues only caught there. Is there a simple way to do that? """ See th

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code lslebodn commented: """ I do not think that initialisation to NULL is the best solution for Wunitialized on RHLE6. My experience is that such bugs occurs when there is some suspicious code in functi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/56/78/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50#issuecomment-259444704

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-11-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ I've updated this series and I'm still waiting for CI to finish. A lot of warnings were just caught when building on RHEL6 machine (which passes gracefully now). I'll post the

[SSSD] [sssd PR#50][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2016-10-18 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/50 Title: #50: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code lslebodn commented: """ It seems that resolv patches broke `resolv-tests` on fedora 22 and fedora 23. The test has been running for 30 hours without any result. I've just cancelled it. BTW CI did no