[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-18 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (18/08/16 11:37), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (09/08/16 19:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-18 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (09/08/16 19:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >>>

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-12 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (09/08/16 19:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>> > On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>> > >ehlo, >>> > > >>> >

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-09 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> > On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> > >ehlo, >> > > >> > >attched patch is an integration test for regression

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-09 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > >ehlo, > > > > > >attched patch is an integration test for regression #3093. > > >I prepared a test and I let someone

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-09 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > >ehlo, > > > > > >attched patch is an integration test for regression #3093. > > >I prepared a test and I let someone

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-09 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >ehlo, > > > >attched patch is an integration test for regression #3093. > >I prepared a test and I let someone else to fix it :-) > > > >I will try to find more bugs in downstream

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-04 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:55:02PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (04/08/16 12:16), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >> On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >> >ehlo, > >> > > >> >attched patch is an integration test for

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-04 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (04/08/16 12:16), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >ehlo, >> > >> >attched patch is an integration test for regression #3093. >> >I prepared a test and I let someone else to fix it :-) >> > >>

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-04 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >ehlo, > > > >attched patch is an integration test for regression #3093. > >I prepared a test and I let someone else to fix it :-) > > > >I will try to find more bugs in downstream

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-03 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (13/07/16 17:48), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >ehlo, > >attched patch is an integration test for regression #3093. >I prepared a test and I let someone else to fix it :-) > >I will try to find more bugs in downstream tests. > >BTW we might move test from test_ts_cache somewhere else. >But it was the