RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Bu, Yitian
Hi Viresh: I have verified this patch, all the issues I reported disappeared. Thanks for the quick fix. Best Regards > -Original Message- > From: Viresh Kumar [mailto:viresh.ku...@linaro.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 1:19 PM > To: r...@rjwysocki.net > Cc: linaro-ker...@lists.linar

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10 July 2014 12:38, Bu, Yitian wrote: > Hi Viresh: > > I have verified this patch, all the issues I reported disappeared. > Thanks for the quick fix. Please don't top post. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Rafael would be adding your: Tested-by: Bu Yitian Let us know if you don't

RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Bu, Yitian
> -Original Message- > From: Viresh Kumar [mailto:viresh.ku...@linaro.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:10 PM > To: Bu, Yitian > Cc: r...@rjwysocki.net; linaro-ker...@lists.linaro.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org; arvind.chau...@arm.com; sriva...@mit.edu; > skan...@codeaurora.org;

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/09/2014 08:47 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> > So it would again help to see stacks of other tasks, to see who holds > >> > the i_mutex and where it's stuck... > > The stacks print got garbled due to having large amount of tasks and too > > low of a > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio: rng: ensure reads happen after successful probe

2014-07-10 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:18:36PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 11:04:53AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > The hwrng core asks for random data in the hwrng_register() call itself > > from commit d9e7972619. This doesn't play well with virtio -- the > > DRIVER_OK bit is only set

[net] igb: Workaround for i210 Errata 25: Slow System Clock

2014-07-10 Thread Jeff Kirsher
From: Todd Fujinaka On some devices, the internal PLL circuit occasionally provides the wrong clock frequency after power up. The probability of failure is less than one failure per 1000 power cycles. When the failure occurs, the internal clock frequency is around 1/20 of the correct frequency.

Re: [net] igb: Workaround for i210 Errata 25: Slow System Clock

2014-07-10 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 01:47:15 -0700 > From: Todd Fujinaka > > On some devices, the internal PLL circuit occasionally provides the > wrong clock frequency after power up. The probability of failure is less > than one failure per 1000 power cycles. When the failure occurs, th

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio: rng: ensure reads happen after successful probe

2014-07-10 Thread Amit Shah
On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [12:18:36], Jason Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 11:04:53AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > The hwrng core asks for random data in the hwrng_register() call itself > > from commit d9e7972619. This doesn't play well with virtio -- the > > DRIVER_OK bit is only set by virti

Re: [PATCH v3] crypto: caam - fix memleak in caam_jr module

2014-07-10 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:52:41AM +0300, Cristian Stoica wrote: > This patch fixes a memory leak that appears when caam_jr module is unloaded. > > Cc: # 3.13+ > Signed-off-by: Cristian Stoica Patch applied. -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio: rng: ensure reads happen after successful probe

2014-07-10 Thread Amit Shah
On (Thu) 10 Jul 2014 [16:45:14], Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:18:36PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 11:04:53AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > > The hwrng core asks for random data in the hwrng_register() call itself > > > from commit d9e7972619. This doesn't

Re: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter WRITE_SAME_16

2014-07-10 Thread h...@infradead.org
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:36:26PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote: > Ok; I am concerned about older kernels that do not have no_write_same flag. > I suppose I can work directly with these Distros and give them a choice: > either implement > the no_write_same flag or filter the command in our driver. I

[PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: rng: ensure reads happen after successful probe

2014-07-10 Thread Amit Shah
The hwrng core asks for random data in the hwrng_register() call itself from commit d9e7972619. This doesn't play well with virtio -- the DRIVER_OK bit is only set by virtio core on a successful probe, and we're not yet out of our probe routine when this call is made. This causes the host to not

[PATCH v3 1/2] hwrng: fetch randomness only after device init

2014-07-10 Thread Amit Shah
Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read from them. This commit makes the call to rng_get_data() depend on no init fn pointer bein

Re: [PATCH 7/8] drivers: scsi: storvsc: Set srb_flags in all cases

2014-07-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:40:09PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:46:51PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > Correctly set SRB flags for all valid I/O directions. Some IHV drivers > > > on the Windows host require this. > > > > What are IHV drivers? > > If the target

Re: [PATCH 7/8] drivers: scsi: storvsc: Set srb_flags in all cases

2014-07-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> default: > vm_srb->data_in = UNKNOWN_TYPE; > - vm_srb->win8_extension.srb_flags = 0; > + vm_srb->win8_extension.srb_flags |= (SRB_FLAGS_DATA_IN | > + SRB_FLAGS_DATA_OUT); This would usually be a command

Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Set cmd_per_lun to reflect value supported by the Host

2014-07-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> - .cmd_per_lun = 1, > + .cmd_per_lun = 255, > .can_queue =STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS*STORVSC_MAX_TARGETS, slave_configure immediately adjusts this down to STORVSC_MAX_IO_REQUESTS (250), any reson to start out with the magic 255 here? -- To unsubscribe fr

[net] igb: do a reset on SR-IOV re-init if device is down

2014-07-10 Thread Jeff Kirsher
From: Stefan Assmann To properly re-initialize SR-IOV it is necessary to reset the device even if it is already down. Not doing this may result in Tx unit hangs. Cc: stable Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann Tested-by: Aaron Brown Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/ig

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] hwrng: fetch randomness only after device init

2014-07-10 Thread Jason Cooper
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:42:34PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" > added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. > However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read > from them. > > This co

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10 July 2014 16:45, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Looks good to me. But I think it would be better to move the invocation of > kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() itself, so that update_policy_cpu() > will do all the work involved in updating the policy->cpu, as its name > suggests. Its called

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 07/10/2014 10:49 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where > clusters > have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster share it. > > Consider a dual cluster platform with 2 cores per cluster. During suspend we > start offlining CP

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 07/10/2014 04:50 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 10 July 2014 16:45, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> Looks good to me. But I think it would be better to move the invocation of >> kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() itself, so that update_policy_cpu() >> will do all the work involved in updating the p

Re: [PATCH] Kernel OOPS in xen_netbk_rx_action / xenvif_gop_skb

2014-07-10 Thread Wei Liu
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote: > Hello Wei Liu, > > On 27.06.2014 20:24, Philipp Hahn wrote: > > On 27.06.2014 19:48, Philipp Hahn wrote:> I guess we found the problem > > ourselves: For thus removed skb's the > >> reference counter on the associated vif was not decr

[PATCH V2] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where clusters have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster share it. Consider a dual cluster platform with 2 cores per cluster. During suspend we start offlining CPUs from 1 to 3. When CPU2 is remove, policy->kobj would b

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10 July 2014 16:52, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > I know.. That's why it makes even more sense to consolidate all the > work into one function. We can restructure cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() > such that the kobject_move() can be moved to update_policy_cpu(). Done. -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Sasha Levin
On 07/10/2014 03:37 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > I do think that the most useful thing you could do at the moment, > is to switch away from running trinity on -next temporarily, and > run it instead on Linus's current git or on 3.16-rc4, but with > f00cdc6df7d7 reverted and my "take 2" inserted in its

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] compiler/gcc4: Make quirk for asm_volatile_goto( ) unconditional

2014-07-10 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 02/13/2014 12:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:37:08AM -0800, tip-bot for Steven Noonan wrote: >> Commit-ID: a9f180345f5378ac87d80ed0bea55ba421d83859 >> Gitweb: >> http://git.kernel.org/tip/a9f180345f5378ac87d80ed0bea55ba421d83859 >> Author: Steven Noonan >> Au

Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Bu, Yitian
> 在 2014年7月10日,20:41,"Viresh Kumar" 写道: > > This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where > clusters > have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster share it. > > Consider a dual cluster platform with 2 cores per cluster. During suspend we > start offlining

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > > 3.14 unless someone does the leg work of making them applicable. > > > > Ergo, this series cont

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:16:00 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > > > 3.14 unless someone does

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Sasha Levin
On 07/10/2014 08:46 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/10/2014 03:37 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote: >> > I do think that the most useful thing you could do at the moment, >> > is to switch away from running trinity on -next temporarily, and >> > run it instead on Linus's current git or on 3.16-rc4, but with >

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:16 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > > > 3.14 unless someone does t

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/10/2014 08:46 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > > On 07/10/2014 03:37 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >> > I do think that the most useful thing you could do at the moment, > >> > is to switch away from running trinity on -next temporarily, and > >> > run it instead

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:40:21 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:16 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmute

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/10/2014 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >> And finally, (not) holding the i_mmap_mutex: > > I don't understand what prompts you to show this particular task. > > I imagine the dump shows lots of other tasks which are waiting to get an > > i_mmap_mutex

[PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: dynamically added OF nodes need to call of_node_init

2014-07-10 Thread Tyrel Datwyler
Commit 75b57ecf9 refactored device tree nodes to use kobjects such that they can be exposed via /sysfs. A secondary commit 0829f6d1f furthered this rework by moving the kobect initialization logic out of of_node_add into its own of_node_init function. The inital commit removed the existing kref_ini

[PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: dynamically added OF nodes need to call of_node_init

2014-07-10 Thread Tyrel Datwyler
Commit 75b57ecf9 refactored device tree nodes to use kobjects such that they can be exposed via /sysfs. A secondary commit 0829f6d1f furthered this rework by moving the kobect initialization logic out of of_node_add into its own of_node_init function. The inital commit removed the existing kref_ini

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:40:21 +0200 > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:16 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbra

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Sasha Levin
On 07/10/2014 02:52 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > On 07/10/2014 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >> And finally, (not) holding the i_mmap_mutex: >>> > > I don't understand what prompts you to show this particular task. >>> > > I imagine the dump shows lo

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/10/2014 02:52 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> > On 07/10/2014 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > >> And finally, (not) holding the i_mmap_mutex: > >>> > > I don't understand what prompts you to show this pa

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Sasha Levin
On 07/10/2014 03:06 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > On 07/10/2014 02:52 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: >>> > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > > >> > On 07/10/2014 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > >> And finally, (not) holding the i_mmap

Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Saravana Kannan
On 07/10/2014 08:12 AM, Bu, Yitian wrote: > > >> 在 2014年7月10日,20:41,"Viresh Kumar" 写道: >> >> This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where >> clusters >> have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster share it. >> >> Consider a dual cluster platform with 2 core

Re: [net] igb: do a reset on SR-IOV re-init if device is down

2014-07-10 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 03:29:39 -0700 > From: Stefan Assmann > > To properly re-initialize SR-IOV it is necessary to reset the device > even if it is already down. Not doing this may result in Tx unit hangs. > > Cc: stable > Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann > Tested-by: Aaron

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/10/2014 03:06 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> > On 07/10/2014 02:52 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >>> > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > >> > On 07/10/2014 01:55 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > >>>

Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: dynamically added OF nodes need to call of_node_init

2014-07-10 Thread Nathan Fontenot
On 07/10/2014 01:50 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote: > Commit 75b57ecf9 refactored device tree nodes to use kobjects such that they > can be exposed via /sysfs. A secondary commit 0829f6d1f furthered this rework > by moving the kobect initialization logic out of of_node_add into its own > of_node_init fun

Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Don't set the 8to6 dither flag when not scaling"

2014-07-10 Thread Hans de Bruin
On 07/09/2014 10:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: This reverts commit 773875bfb6737982903c42d1ee88cf60af80089c. It is very much needed and the lack of dithering has been reported by a large list of people with various gen2/3 hardware. Also, the original patch was complete non-sense since the WARNING

Re: + shmem-fix-faulting-into-a-hole-while-its-punched-take-2.patch added to -mm tree

2014-07-10 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > I'll pore over the new log. It does help to know that its base kernel > is more stable: thanks so much. But whether I can work out any more... Actually, today's log is not much use to me: for a tenth of a second it just shows "NNN printk messages dro

RE: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter WRITE_SAME_16

2014-07-10 Thread KY Srinivasan
> -Original Message- > From: James Bottomley [mailto:jbottom...@parallels.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 3:27 PM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; m...@mkp.net; h...@infradead.org; > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; a...@canonical.com; stable@vger.kernel.org; > li

RE: [PATCH V2 2/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Set cmd_per_lun to reflect value supported by the Host

2014-07-10 Thread KY Srinivasan
> -Original Message- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:25 AM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; > oher...@suse.com; jbottom...@parallels.com; h...@infradead.org; > jasow...@redhat.com;

Re: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter WRITE_SAME_16

2014-07-10 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 21:02 +, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: James Bottomley [mailto:jbottom...@parallels.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 3:27 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; m...@mkp.net; h...@infradead.org; > > de...@lin

RE: [PATCH 7/8] drivers: scsi: storvsc: Set srb_flags in all cases

2014-07-10 Thread KY Srinivasan
> -Original Message- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 3:17 AM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; oher...@suse.com; > jbottom...@parallels.com; jasow...@redhat.com;

patch "serial: core: Preserve termios c_cflag for console resume" added to tty tree

2014-07-10 Thread gregkh
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled serial: core: Preserve termios c_cflag for console resume to my tty git tree which can be found at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git in the tty-next branch. The patch will show up in the next

patch "serial: Test for no tx data on tx restart" added to tty tree

2014-07-10 Thread gregkh
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled serial: Test for no tx data on tx restart to my tty git tree which can be found at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git in the tty-linus branch. The patch will show up in the next release of the

Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Bu, Yitian
> 在 2014年7月11日,3:26,"Saravana Kannan" 写道: > >> On 07/10/2014 08:12 AM, Bu, Yitian wrote: >> >> >>> 在 2014年7月10日,20:41,"Viresh Kumar" 写道: >>> >>> This is only relevant to implementations with multiple clusters, where >>> clusters >>> have separate clock lines but all CPUs within a cluster s

[PATCH 3.12.y] aio: revert the duplicate commit

2014-07-10 Thread Gu Zheng
Commit 0e2e24e5dc(aio: fix kernel memory disclosure in io_getevents() introduced in v3.10) is the same as bee3f7b818(aio: fix kernel memory disclosure in io_getevents() introduced in v3.10), it seems a mistake here, so revert the duplicate one. Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng --- fs/aio.c |3 --- 1

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: move policy kobj to policy->cpu at resume

2014-07-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10 July 2014 16:45, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Looks good to me. But I think it would be better to move the invocation of > kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() itself, so that update_policy_cpu() > will do all the work involved in updating the policy->cpu, as its name > suggests. > > With tha

Re: [PATCH 4/8] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Filter WRITE_SAME_16

2014-07-10 Thread h...@infradead.org
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:27:24PM +, James Bottomley wrote: > If we fix it at source, why would there be any need to filter? That's > the reason the no_write_same flag was introduced. If we can find and > fix the bug, it can go back into the stable trees as a bug fix, hence > nothing should