Ok,
here are the two patches needed for the correct backport of the third
patch.
The 1st one is needed so that the 3rd one applies
cleanly and the 2nd one fixes a !SMP build (see:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134398493228757). Also, it is the
backported copy which went into 3.2 collapsing t
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:55:53PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Ok,
>
> here are the two patches needed for the correct backport of the third
> patch.
>
> The 1st one is needed so that the 3rd one applies
> cleanly and the 2nd one fixes a !SMP build (see:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=1
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:49:16PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:55:53PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Ok,
> >
> > here are the two patches needed for the correct backport of the third
> > patch.
> >
> > The 1st one is needed so that the 3rd one applies
> > cleanly and th
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:48:34PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So I think what happened is that you said at the time they don't apply
> cleanly, I did the backports but you must've applied them in the
> meantime because we needed 1/3 and 2/3 so that the actual backported fix
> can apply cleanly
