[patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-07 Thread Mike Galbraith
Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than 3.14 unless someone does the leg work of making them applicable. Ergo, this series contains.. 397335f0 rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real 82084984 rtmutex: Detect changes in the pi lock chain 3d5c9340 rtmutex: Handle dead

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-09 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > 3.14 unless someone does the leg work of making them applicable. > > Ergo, this series contains.. > > 397335f0 rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real > 82084984 rt

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > > 3.14 unless someone does the leg work of making them applicable. > > > > Ergo, this series cont

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:16:00 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > > > 3.14 unless someone does

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:16 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > > > 3.14 unless someone does t

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:40:21 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:16 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Seems the below stable tagged rtmute

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:40:21 +0200 > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:16 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:12:18AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 16:55 +0200, Mike Galbra

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-14 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:55:45PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > 3.14 unless someone does the leg work of making them applicable. > > Ergo, this series contains.. > > 397335f0 rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real > 82084

Re: [patch 0/4] 3.12-stable rtmutex @stable backports

2014-07-22 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 07/07/2014 04:55 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Seems the below stable tagged rtmutex fixes won't go further back than > 3.14 unless someone does the leg work of making them applicable. > > Ergo, this series contains.. > > 397335f0 rtmutex: Fix deadlock detector for real > 82084984 rtmutex: Detec