Hello,
If you want to get an answer from your roster, not from stranger/public, maybe
the question or answer would be a little private. We can list many which should
not be public, or meaningless for public. For example:
"Anybody can lend me 1000$? I will refund in one week"
"What is Kevin's new
I found e serious issue with FC 3921bis Managing Presence Subscriptions.
Reading through section 3. Managing Presence Subscriptions,
we find a requirement, that server MUST stamp every outbound
(un)subscribe(d) presence stanza with bare JID of the user in the 'from'
attribute of presence stanza.
Fulvio Satta wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I've read the XEP-0107 and I'm shocked for the numbero of the possible mood
> values, now :D
You are only shocked? Why not shocked, surprised, disappointed, and angry?
> But I think that is a good idea if an user can select mor than a mood at the
> time. For
Hi guys.
I've read the XEP-0107 and I'm shocked for the numbero of the possible mood
values, now :D
But I think that is a good idea if an user can select mor than a mood at the
time. For example, a man can be angry and thristy in the same time, or
impressed and interested, and so on.
I don't kn
Hi,
I'm looking for some suggestions (or perhaps I'm looking to write my own
XEP) for a standard way to allow XMPP to act like a message queue.
Allow me to explain my current hack, and then perhaps some 'better ideas'
will follow.
There are 2 types of users on my Closed jabber network. Let's ca
Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:08 am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
>>> On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:20 AM, Lauri Kaila wrote:
2008/1/31, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:53:21PM -0800, Rober
On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:08 am, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:20 AM, Lauri Kaila wrote:
> >> 2008/1/31, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Hello
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:53:21PM -0800, Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
> >>>
Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> We can specify that a session ID must be a UUID. I think that's a good
>> idea.
>
> While I think using UUID's in general is a great idea, just keep in mind
> that traditional UUID calculation implementations
On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:20 AM, Lauri Kaila wrote:
2008/1/31, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:53:21PM -0800, Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
But the truth is that all of that complexity isn't even necessary,
as long
as the XMPP client daemon can know where
On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
We can specify that a session ID must be a UUID. I think that's a
good idea.
While I think using UUID's in general is a great idea, just keep in
mind that traditional UUID calculation implementations have security
concerns because the
On Jan 31, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
How stanzas are handled by an internal plugin architecture is not part
of the specifications for the wire protocol, nor should it be.
Oh of course not, but practically you will run into problems if you
have more than one reply to an in
On Jan 31, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Why is it not possible for a plugin to register for Jingle-related
events based on the application type? Once a plugin receives such an
event, it can then reg
Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:20 AM, Lauri Kaila wrote:
>
>> 2008/1/31, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:53:21PM -0800, Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
But the truth is that all of that complexity isn't even necessary,
>>
Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Why is it not possible for a plugin to register for Jingle-related
>> events based on the application type? Once a plugin receives such an
>> event, it can then register for Jingle-related events based on the
>>
On Jan 31, 2008, at 1:10 AM, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
Why couldn't it know now? If you are unable to filter/register by
other
criteries than just the namespace of toplevel child, then you will
find
problems elsewhere, too.
If the app-level stanza router was stateful (ie: keeping track
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Why is it not possible for a plugin to register for Jingle-related
events based on the application type? Once a plugin receives such an
event, it can then register for Jingle-related events based on the
session ID. So for example if a session
I've done some experiments in Psi with the guidance of Remko, but had to put
that aside to get my dissertation done. Currently Massimiliano Mirra from
SamePlace (http://sameplace.cc/) is experimenting with it (
http://dev.hyperstruct.net/xmpp4moz/ticket/100). I guess the most indicated
people about
On Jan 31, 2008 4:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly. Whether that works better in practice remains to be seen. But I
> think it has some interesting possibilities.
This does all seem quite interesting to me.
Do you have this demo-able Nick? :)
/K
Nick Vidal wrote:
>> In what way is this system different from a mailing list system over
>> XMPP? There you have people asking and people answering. Isn't it
>> quite the same in the end?
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>
> The biggest difference is trust and personalization. You are connected with
> friends onl
> In what way is this system different from a mailing list system over
> XMPP? There you have people asking and people answering. Isn't it
> quite the same in the end?
>
> Tobias
>
The biggest difference is trust and personalization. You are connected with
friends only. Information may come from f
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Kevin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 3:48 PM, Tobias Markmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In what way is this system different from a mailing list system over
> > XMPP? There you have people asking and people answering. Isn't it
> > quite t
On Jan 31, 2008 3:48 PM, Tobias Markmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In what way is this system different from a mailing list system over
> XMPP? There you have people asking and people answering. Isn't it
> quite the same in the end?
I think the tag filtering is the main difference, as I underst
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Vidal wrote:
> > Hi Peter and Kevin,
> >
> > In the spirit of illustrating a generic solution that would suit this
> > specific question-and-answer pattern, I offer a simple example:
> >
> > - Peter creates
Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Thu Jan 31 05:33:11 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I realize that the IETF defers Internet-Drafts after 6 months, but they
>> have many more specifications under consideration than we do and thus
>> need to keep the active list from becoming unduly large. Given the
>> s
Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 11:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> - Kevin publishes an answer to whatever node better identifies the subject
>>> (free tagging) AND the following metadata to the "commented" node:
>
> I think Kevin might want to post both to his own nod
>
> > > - Kevin publishes an answer to whatever node better identifies the
> subject
> > > (free tagging) AND the following metadata to the "commented" node:
>
> I think Kevin might want to post both to his own node, and a reference
> to Peter's node, but yes, that seems like an approach.
>
Yes, K
On Thu Jan 31 05:33:11 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
I realize that the IETF defers Internet-Drafts after 6 months, but
they
have many more specifications under consideration than we do and
thus
need to keep the active list from becoming unduly large. Given the
smaller number of protocols we
On Jan 30, 2008 11:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Kevin publishes an answer to whatever node better identifies the subject
> > (free tagging) AND the following metadata to the "commented" node:
I think Kevin might want to post both to his own node, and a reference
to Pet
2008/1/31, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:53:21PM -0800, Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
> > But the truth is that all of that complexity isn't even necessary, as long
> > as the XMPP client daemon can know where to route any individual stanza. If
> > th
Hello
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:53:21PM -0800, Robert Quattlebaum wrote:
> But the truth is that all of that complexity isn't even necessary, as long
> as the XMPP client daemon can know where to route any individual stanza. If
> there was some sort if information in all of the jingle stanzas w
30 matches
Mail list logo
